Marketably_sukiyaki_dubious

Is it possible for a parent process to wait for the termination of his child process and then to continue working on his own task? How can it be done using threads where a thread could be bound to wait for the termination of another thread and then continue working on his task. Write a piece of code to demonstrate both these cases in a single program

Is it possible for a parent process to wait for the termination of his child process and then to continue working on his own task? How can it be done using threads where a thread could be bound to wait for the termination of another thread and then continue working on his task. Write a piece of code to demonstrate both these cases in a single program. This is the Question from System Programming

Is it possible for a parent process to wait for the termination of his child process and then to continue working on his own task? How can it be done using threads where a thread could be bound to wait for the termination of another thread and then continue working on his task. Write a piece of code to demonstrate both these cases in a single program. Please Note: This question is from system Programming subject.

When a thread is active on a Java virtual machine (JVM), the JVM only permits that thread to execute a single method at a time. Do you have any proof to back up your suspicions or do they remain just that?

What are the key differences between a thread that operates at the user level and one that operates at the kernel level? Is there a species that has a distinct edge over another?

What is the difference between a thread running in user mode and a thread running in the kernel? Do any advantages exist that one species may have over another?

A thread is a minute, individual part of something bigger. Each thread is a component of the larger process, which is another way of stating that a process may be broken down into several threads. Multithreading in a computer language is sometimes referred to as "thread-based multitasking." An explanation of multithreading's purpose is necessary.

In execution of a program a new thread (A) is created and begins in the New state. As it requires an input from the user, the schedular is called and changes it into the runnab state. Finally it gets a time slice from the processor but suddenly a new urgent thread (B) appears which needs to be handled by the CPU. Thus, the thread (A) is blocked and moved back to the run queue.

When a thread is executing at the user or kernel level, what's the difference? Does one species have an advantage over the other?

What's the difference between a thread running in user mode and one running in kernel mode? Is there a species that is better than the others?

We previously said that there may be no more than one active method inside of each thread that is currently running in the JVM at any one time. What gives you reason to think that this is true?

Create two Thread subclasses, one with a run() that starts up, captures the reference of the second Thread object and then calls wait(). The other class run() should call notifyAll() for the first thread after some number ofn seconds have passed, so the first thread can print a message

As we discussed, only one function may be executed within a given JVM thread at any one moment. What gives you that idea?

We said that only one method may be active inside each thread executing in the JVM at any given moment. What makes you believe this is the case?

What is the difference between a thread running in the user mode and one running in the kernel mode? Is there a favored species among the alternatives?

perform several operations at the same time. * Each Thread that you run works separately from the rest of the commands in the program, and therefore in the event of any error occurring in the Thread, it will not affect the rest of the commands in the program, as it does not affect any other Thread running in the program. In light of your study of multiple channels, • Write a program in the Java language that demonstrates this concept - you can choose the nature of the program that you want to achieve

Threads are regarded as "lightweight" processes for several reasons. What are the prerequisites for creating a new thread? They are used differently from the ones employed to build a procedure.

In this particular situation, a solution that just makes use of a single thread is preferable than one that makes use of several threads.

Why is it preferable in a cooperative multithreading system for two threads to communicate with each other via the event queue rather than directly? What are some of the drawbacks of direct communication?

As we discussed, each JVM thread can only execute a single method at a time. What evidence do you have to support this claim?

A thread can only execute one method at a time while it is executing on a Java virtual machine (JVM). Do you have any proof that would corroborate your suspicions?

What system resources are used when a new thread is started? That they are not involved in the process of creating a method is what sets them apart. ..

We previously said that each JVM thread can only have one method active. Why do you think this?