Consider two players, designated by i = 1,2, involved in a dynamic bargaining over a perfectly divisible surplus of size 1. At the beginning of the interaction (at timet 1), player 1 chooses x1 in [0, 1]. Player 2 observes this offer and decides whether or not to accept it. If player 2 accepts this offer, the game ends and the utilities of player 1 and 2 equal x1 and 1- x1, respectively. If player 2 does not accept this offer, the game goes into the second round with a probability of \pi = 2|1/2-x11, while with probability 1 -\ pi the game ends and both players get a payoff of 0. If the game reaches the second round, t = 2, player 2 makes a counter-offer x2 in [0, 1] observing the whole past. Player 1 sees this offer and decides whether or not to accept it. If player 1 accepts x2, then the game ends and player 1 gets a payoff of x2 and player 2 a utility of 1 - x2. Both players get a payoff of zero when player 1 rejects player 2's offer x2 and the game ends. We assume that the game is common knowledge among the players. So, we have perfect information. Moreover, we concentrate on pure actions. Further, both players are risk - neutral von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximizers when evaluating risky prospects. (0.) Formulate this strategic interaction via an extensive - form game in pure actions under perfect information. (a.) Identify the dynamic best responses, the set of subgame perfect equilibrium outcome paths and the set of subgame perfect equilibrium strategies.

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter8: Game Theory
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8.7P
Question
Consider two players, designated by i
= 1,2, involved in a dynamic bargaining
over a perfectly divisible surplus of size
1. At the beginning of the interaction (at
timet 1), player 1 chooses x1 in [0, 1].
Player 2 observes this offer and decides
whether or not to accept it. If player 2
accepts this offer, the game ends and the
utilities of player 1 and 2 equal x1 and 1-
x1, respectively. If player 2 does not
accept this offer, the game goes into the
second round with a probability of \pi
= 2|1/2-x11, while with probability 1 -\
pi the game ends and both players get a
payoff of 0. If the game reaches the
second round, t = 2, player 2 makes a
counter-offer x2 in [0, 1] observing the
whole past. Player 1 sees this offer and
decides whether or not to accept it. If
player 1 accepts x2, then the game ends
and player 1 gets a payoff of x2 and
player 2 a utility of 1 - x2. Both players
get a payoff of zero when player 1 rejects
player 2's offer x2 and the game ends.
We assume that the game is common
knowledge among the players. So, we
have perfect information. Moreover, we
concentrate on pure actions. Further,
both players are risk - neutral von
Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility
maximizers when evaluating risky
prospects. (0.) Formulate this strategic
interaction via an extensive - form game
in pure actions under perfect
information. (a.) Identify the dynamic
best responses, the set of subgame
perfect equilibrium outcome paths and
the set of subgame perfect equilibrium
strategies.
Transcribed Image Text:Consider two players, designated by i = 1,2, involved in a dynamic bargaining over a perfectly divisible surplus of size 1. At the beginning of the interaction (at timet 1), player 1 chooses x1 in [0, 1]. Player 2 observes this offer and decides whether or not to accept it. If player 2 accepts this offer, the game ends and the utilities of player 1 and 2 equal x1 and 1- x1, respectively. If player 2 does not accept this offer, the game goes into the second round with a probability of \pi = 2|1/2-x11, while with probability 1 -\ pi the game ends and both players get a payoff of 0. If the game reaches the second round, t = 2, player 2 makes a counter-offer x2 in [0, 1] observing the whole past. Player 1 sees this offer and decides whether or not to accept it. If player 1 accepts x2, then the game ends and player 1 gets a payoff of x2 and player 2 a utility of 1 - x2. Both players get a payoff of zero when player 1 rejects player 2's offer x2 and the game ends. We assume that the game is common knowledge among the players. So, we have perfect information. Moreover, we concentrate on pure actions. Further, both players are risk - neutral von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximizers when evaluating risky prospects. (0.) Formulate this strategic interaction via an extensive - form game in pure actions under perfect information. (a.) Identify the dynamic best responses, the set of subgame perfect equilibrium outcome paths and the set of subgame perfect equilibrium strategies.
AI-Generated Solution
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
steps

Unlock instant AI solutions

Tap the button
to generate a solution

Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage