Decide molecule proposed Lewis structure Xeo, SF 3 er the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. H₂ BO3 : 0- ட .. : :0: | Xe - 0: ... 1 :0: | :F: H-O B - 0 | :0: : 1 H H Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are:

Decide molecule proposed Lewis structure Xeo, SF 3 er the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. H₂ BO3 : 0- ட .. : :0: | Xe - 0: ... 1 :0: | :F: H-O B - 0 | :0: : 1 H H Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are:

Principles of Modern Chemistry

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305079113

Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. Butler

Publisher:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. Butler

Chapter3: Atomic Shells And Classical Models Of Chemical Bonding

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 99AP: A stable triatomic molecule can be formed that contains one atom each of nitrogen, sulfur, and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The percent ionic character of a bond can be approximated by the formula 16+3.52 , where is the magnitude of the difference in the electronegativities of the atoms (see Fig. 3.18). Calculate the percent ionic character of HF, HCl, HBr, HI, and CsF, and compare the results with those in Table 3.7.
Write Lewis structures for the following: (a) ClF3 (b) PCl5 (c) BF3 (d) PF6
A stable triatomic molecule can be formed that contains one atom each of nitrogen, sulfur, and fluorine. Three bonding structures are possible, depending on which is the central atom: NSF, SNF, and SFN. (a) Write a Lewis diagram for each of these molecules, indicating the formal charge on each atom. (b) Often, the structure with the least separation of formal charge is the most stable. Is this statement consistent with the observed structure for this molecule—namely, NSF, which has a central sulfur atom? (c) Does consideration of the electronegativities of N, S, and F from Figure 3.18 help rationalize this observed structure? Explain.
Decide whether the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. molecule proposed Lewis structure 9 CIF 3 BH3 :0 0-0: :F- FIN: :F: :ö: || : F: -F: H B H 1 H Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? OYes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: OO Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: OYes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as…
Decide wnether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure : 0: H = Br : 0: :0-C- O: HIC C-H Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "O,0". X
Decide whether the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. molecule proposed Lewis structure CH SF3 XeO4 H 1 H-C-H : F S :F: .. F: + :0: I :0-Xe. <- 0: :0: Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many…
Decide whether the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. molecule proposed Lewis structure CIF H BO3 :: :: : F : 0: \/ :F: I =0: :: :: I : F H-O-B-O-H | :0: 1 H Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol…
Decide whether the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. molecule proposed Lewis structure BF CIO BeH2 .. : : : 0: :F: I = 9 - Cl :0: : 0: HBe H Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 O Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as…
Decide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure H : 0: - C. | : 0: : 0: H H O H-CEN: H Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "O,O". X 5
Decide whether the Lewis structure proposed for each molecule is reasonable or not. molecule proposed Lewis structure BF3 SF 3 CO₂ :F: | -B-F: :F- .. | SIF: S-F: || .. :F: 01010 Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? OYes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes, it's a reasonable structure. O No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: O No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: 0 Yes, it's a reasonable structure. No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: * If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many…
ed Lewis struc :: :Z: : Z: |d=8: the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:*
Decide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure :Z: : H H-Ö N — -0. : 0: :Z: ] — :Z: N=N C1: : Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "0,0".