Concept explainers
Review the kinds of evidence for evolution analyzed in Sections 2.1–2.5. List the sources of evidence that were available to Darwin and those that appeared later. For example, of the evidence for microevolution discussed in Section 2.1, Darwin knew, and wrote, about divergent strains of domestic plants and animals and about vestigial structures. However, in Darwin’s day no one had ever directly observed change across generations in natural populations. For each section, indicate which evidence you consider strongest and which you consider weakest. Explain why.
To review: The kinds of evidence for evolution analyzed.
Introduction: Science is the method of “acquiring knowledge” based on facts learned through experiments and observations. The applications and research studies on science help to improve the standard of lives.
Explanation of Solution
The kinds of evidence for evolution that are analyzed are grouped into 5 categories and are given as follows:
- Evidence of speciation
- Evidence of microevolution
- Evidence from common ancestors
- Evidence from macroevolution
- The age of the Earth.
To list: The sources of evidence that were available to Darwin and those that appeared later.
Explanation of Solution
Evidence of microevolution: It is the study on the way in which the populations change over generations. Selective breeding is one of the situation in which microevolution can take place. Selective breeding is otherwise referred to as artificial selection and occurs when the humans selectively breed useful traits in organisms such as crops and livestock. Darwin knew about different strains of domestic plants and animals and included this in his work.
Evidence of speciation: It is a process of creating a new species from an older one. Both experiments in the laboratory and natural populations are examples of speciation. Evidence from natural populations, such as Darwin’s finches, is available for evidence.
Evidence from common ancestors: Similarity or homology between two organisms also gives the evidence for evolution. Anatomical homologies were known to Darwin but molecular homologies were not.
Evidence from macroevolution: It is the study of macroevolution changes in the fossil record. Fossils are any traces of organisms that lived in the past. The first type of fossil evidence is extinction and succession. Georges Cuvier found species that were only found in the fossil record. Others believed that they were the members of the current species.
The age of the Earth: Hutton suggests that the processes that are responsible for the formation of Earth are still happening today. Based on this, they started to make a geological time scale based on this type.
To explain: The evidence that is considered as the strongest and weakest and the reason corresponding to the decision.
Explanation of Solution
Microevolution is strong evidence for evolution; for example, vestigial structures in the hind limbs of wolves and whales. Wolves and whales are considered to share a common ancestor as whales have hind legs similar to wolves and other walking mammals.
In natural populations, speciation is strong evidence for evolution. Darwin’s finches are strong evidence for speciation that supports evolution.
Common ancestors provide strong evidence for evolution. Both chimps and bonobos shared repeats with humans, but less relative primates such as orangutans and gorillas do not.
Macroevolution provides strong evidence for evolution. Few transitional fossils were identified by Darwin, but a large number of fossils have been discovered today, which provide strong evidence for evolution.
The evidence of age of the Earth is considered as the weakest. The extreme age of the Earth is very important as the process of evolution is comparatively very slow. Without an old Earth, Darwin’s model of evolution would not be possible. Darwin did not know the age of Earth for his theory of evolution and was concerned about a possible young Sun, making the Earth even younger.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Evolutionary Analysis (5th Edition)
- The theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardThe theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardIn lecture we discussed eight (8) lines of evidence that Darwin used to lay out his argument for the fact of evolution in his book On the Origin of Species (1859). Using your materials from lecture and the last chapter of the "Origin" that we read for section, 1) rank order these lines of evidence based on what you find the most to the least compelling. 2) Be sure to describe each of these lines of evidence and 3) discuss how they are, or not, relevant in the early 21st century. (From old pset1) Evidence Variation in domesticated species and breeding (artificial selection) Hierarchical classification (groups nested within groups) "Unity of type" - modification of the same basic structure (homology) Evident "fit" of organisms to environments (but imperfections) (adaptation) Structures without apparent function (vestigial structures) Similarity of organisms in early phases of development (embryology) Order in diversity through time in the fossil record (paleontology) Order in…arrow_forward
- Darwin was the first person to note that evolutionary outcomes are probabilistic, meaning that they depend on the likelihood of outcomes rather than on certainties. Explain what this means in the context of Darwin’s theory of how evolution occurs? That is, how is Darwin’s theory is dependent upon the chances of a certain outcome and not on the absolute certainty of any particular outcome?arrow_forward1) What is the source of modifications that contribute to the variety of offspring produced by descent with modification (HINT: Think of concepts discussed in the genetics and reproduction units) 2) During Charles Darwin’s voyages, he observed species of plants and animals unique to specific islands, but with similar looking species on nearby islands. How did Darwin explain these similarities and differences? 3) Unique species of animals found on isolated islands are not randomly different from their mainland “cousins,” they are especially and uniquely adapted for island life. Provide examples of this phenomenon. How can this occurrence be explained?arrow_forwardUsing the concepts of variability, environmental pressure and natural selection, how does the synthetic theory of evolution explain Darwinian natural selection?arrow_forward
- Describe the two principles of evolution that Charles Darwin proposed: 1) Common Descent with Modification and 2) Natural Selection. Give examples of eacharrow_forwardUsing the concepts of variability, environmental pressure and natural selection how does the synthetic theory explain the darwinian natural selection?arrow_forwardBriefly discuss the differences in how a selectionist (one that believes that Natural Selection is a strong evolutionary force) and a neutralist (one that believes that genetic drift is a strong evolutionary force) views the following: molecular clock, evolution of coding sequences, evolution of "pseudogenes".arrow_forward
- Lamarck was an early naturalist who published his own ideas about species changing over time. He, however was mistaken about one critical aspect of evolution. If you could travel back in time what advice would you give Lamarck to correct his misunderstanding? Tell him that species actually do change and evolve over time Tell him that traits acquired during an organisms life are not passed on to offspring Tell him that artificial selection does not lead to new varieties of plants and animals Tell him that characteristics are heritable: Parents do pass on their characteristics to their offspringarrow_forwardThe study featured in "This is a Truly Lousy Experiment" relied on well-established conclusions from the classic research of Charles Darwin. From the article, Darwin's research on evolution by natural selection was based on the rationale: If artificial selection by breeders could generate diversity in only a few generations of pigeons, then it would not be surprising that nature would be capable of generating the vast diversity of organisms found on earth. O If natural selection by breeders could generate diversity in only a few generations of pigeons, then it would not be surprising that artificial selection over a very long time, would be capable of generating the vast diversity found on earth. If artificial selection by nature could generate diversity in only a few generations of pigeons, then it would not be surprising that breeders, over a very long time, would be capable of generating the vast diversity found on earth. Charles Darwin did not study diversity and evolution. If…arrow_forwardexplain the following mechanism of evolution: 1. mutations 2. gene flow 3. genetic drift 4. sexual selection 5. natural selectionarrow_forward
- Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)BiologyISBN:9780134580999Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. HoehnPublisher:PEARSONBiology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStaxAnatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781259398629Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa StouterPublisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
- Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)BiologyISBN:9780815344322Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter WalterPublisher:W. W. Norton & CompanyLaboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781260159363Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, CynthiaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)BiologyISBN:9781260231700Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael WindelspechtPublisher:McGraw Hill Education