Select Search
World Factbook
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
The Age of Johnson
>
Johnson and Boswell
> Influence of personal feeling
Equipoise of biography and criticism
Johnsons last years and death
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume X. The Age of Johnson.
VIII.
Johnson and Boswell
.
§ 27. Influence of personal feeling.
The common result of this method in criticism is that the critic is at his best when he is in sympathy with the writer. Johnson meant to be scrupulously judicial; but he showed personal feelings. He disliked the acrimonious politics of Milton, the querulous sensitiveness of Swift and the timid foppery of Gray. This personal antipathy underlies his criticisms, though it is qualified, at times, even generously. Had Gray written often as in the
Elegy,
he says it had been vain to blame and useless to praise him; and
Paradise Lost
is not the greatest of heroic poems only because it is not the first. Of Dryden and Pope he wrote in friendship, and there exists no finer criticism of them. But no critic has been severer on Drydens negligences, or spoken more ruthlessly of the
Essay on Man.
43
The passage on
Lycidas
is generally regarded as an error of judgment which marks Johnsons limitations as a critic. With his usual courage, he stated a deliberate opinion. He gave his reasonsthe artificiality of the pastoral convention, the confusion of the allegory with actual fact and sacred truth, and the absence of the feeling of real sorrow. But there is the further explanation that he was opposed to some recent tendencies in English poetry. That he had more than
Lycidas
in his mind is shown by the emphasis of his statement. The same ideas reappear in his criticism of Collins and Gray. He objected to the habit of inverting the common order of words, and, on one occasion, cited Thomas Wartons evening gray; he might also have cited mantle blue. It was Warton who occasioned his extempore verses beginning
Wheresoer I turn my view,
All is strange, yet nothing new;
and Warton imitated, as well as edited, the early poems of Milton. Warton was one of many in whom he found faults which he traced to Milton as their original. In criticising
Lycidas,
he had in mind his own contemporaries. When the new tendencies had prevailed, he was said to have judged by a rigorous code of criticism. This code would have been difficult to reconcile with the preface to his edition of Shakespeare; with the praise given by him to Homers heroes, that they are not described but develop themselves;
31
with his statement that real criticism shows the beauty of thought as formed on the workings of the human heart;
32
and with his condemnation of the cant of those who judge by principles rather than perception.
33
44
His views on the matter of poetry are shown in his criticism of Grays
Bard:
To select a singular event, and swell it to a giants bulk by fabulous appendages of spectres and predictions, has little difficulty, for he that forsakes the probable may always find the marvellous. The common growth of mother earth sufficed for him as for Wordsworth. The distinction which he draws between the
Elegy
and
The Bard
was that which ultimately divided Wordsworth and Coleridge. There was enough for him in life as he knew it. And there was a personal reason why, more than the other writers of his century, he should tend to limit nature to human experience. The tumult in his mind was allowed no direct expression in his writings; but it made him look upon the world as the battle ground of thought, and passion, and will.
45
Note 31
.
Boswell,
ed. Hill, G. B., vol.
V,
p. 79.
[
back
]
Note 32
.
Ibid.,
vol.
II,
p. 88.
[
back
]
Note 33
.
Life of Pope.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Equipoise of biography and criticism
Johnsons last years and death
Loading
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Shakespeare
·
Bible
·
Saints
·
Anatomy
·
Harvard Classics
·
Lit. History
·
Quotations
·
Poetry
©
19932013
Bartleby.com
· [
Top 150
]