Session 3 Bibliography

.docx

School

Colorado Christian University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

205A

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by ProfZebra4223 on coursehero.com

1 Session 3 Bibliography Matthew W. Timmons Colorado Christian University PHL-205A-35014-FA23 – World Views Professor Quintana December 9, 2023
2 A Marxist view of medical care https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/354452/ The news story is about Marxism, and they perceive the medical field. Marxist medical care studies emphasize political power and economic dominance in a capitalist society. Marxists feel the health system mirrors society’s class structure through control of health institutions, stratification of health workers, and limited occupational mobility into health professions. Monopoly capital is evident in the growth of medical centers. Marxists share how, under capitalist rule, medical ideology helps maintain class structure and patterns of domination. The article is neutral in its discussion of Marxism. I will do my best to respond to this article. I think that Marxists feel like this is how the medical field should be run. Amazingly, this article happens to mention the growth of medical centers and financial insertion by large corporations, and according to Myers and Noebel (2015), “the American federal government has made aggressive moves in the health care, energy, and banking sectors of the economy” (p.109). When you think about everything, it comes down to money and power, no matter what field. This story does not dive into Marxism or explain anything about Marxism. Communism and Marxism https://unacademy.com/content/upsc/difference-between/communism-and-marxism/ The story summarizes the differences between Marxism and Communism and how they can be used interchangeably. This article starts by teaching the reader what Marxism and Communism are and their importance. The differences between the two are the following. They list the differences between the two on a different basis, for example, the basis of definition, how they are achieved, goals, dictatorship, etc. After going through several bases, the article wraps up with a conclusion. Ultimately, it encourages students to learn about these theories to understand world events and make informed political choices. This story is written positively, informing readers of the differences between the two.
3 I found the story very insightful and informative. I did get to understand the differences between the two. However, I did think that communism was Marxism. I liked how the story broke down the differences in a column-type way without using a column diagram. According to Myers and Noebel (2015), “Many see Marxism and communism as non-threatening. Some even think it’s a little cool” (p.107). The story does have some interesting points. I see Marxism that I can understand, but I wouldn't say I like the methods of certain things. A Brief Introduction to Marxism https://youtu.be/W0GFSUu5UzA?feature=shared The video starts with the definition of the theory of Marxism. You learn who created Marxism when he was born and when he died. The instructor states that Marxism is a conflict theory because it says that a society is in conflict with each other, and Marxism claims that this conflict is between the rich and the poor. Karl Marx wanted to get the best out of people, not just those with money and power. To understand Marxism, you learn about its opposite, capitalism. As a reader, you will get background information and historical facts. Two terms you get to know are bourgeoisie and proletariat. The instructor did not lean the discussion negatively or positively. The presentation on the basic idea of Marxism was interesting. I expected this story to be something other than a video from an instructor. I like how the instructor broke down who invented Marxism and gave background information. In his view, Marx saw communism as liberation and a leveler way of creating a fairer society. Myers and Noebel (2015) say, “And though he claimed to understand the working man, Marx never stepped foot in an actual factory that we know of or made a living with physical labor” (p.105). Yes, who wouldn’t want a society where everyone was treated equally and paid
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help