Accountability, Per the Marine Corps Essay

What also happens is people just lose things and have no idea until later when they need it. Marines lose things because of a few reasons. Probably the most common is when they are being hurried, which is pretty much 100% of the time. The other common reason is because a lot of junior Marines are young, irresponsible, and inexperienced. I’m pretty confident that most of the senior Marines here didn’t start at the level of responsibility or leadership that they are currently at, but have been through what the younger marines are going through and learned from their mistakes, and now trying to teach us so we don’t make them as much as we

Society as a whole could learn from using trust. Without trust the Marine Corps. Would not be as efficient. The socialization techniques of the Marine’s are so effective, because during basic training the men are stripped of everything from their civilian lives. The Marine’s are kept enclosed from modern society during training. They are basically brainwashed. Drill instructors apply physical and mental pressure to the men to start the process of destruction. The process of destruction is to erase the Marine’s former beliefs and confidence. Training to be a Marine is intense, constant abuse and insults. One of the main socialization techniques is motivation.

Accountability is not an abstract concept. It is actually extremely simple. Accountability means saying what you mean, meaning what you say, and doing what you say you 're

Squad leaders should call the platoon together, once they believe that the rest of the marines have had enough time to discuss the subject matter.

The ethics of the Marine Corps, has of recently have degraded due to the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. This has been reflected in the many abuses of those wars, the numerous sexual harassment filings, and the unprecedented suicide rates that seem to climb every year. Many of the higher ups/Generals, were very disturbed by the horrific figures and they have since ordered a Marine Corps wide stand

Accountability is not something I have devoted much thought to or pondered about in detail. While reading Crucial Accountability, I started to recollect experiences in my past where accountability needed to be addressed. I realized that at times, I unconsciously held accountability conversations that were successful; and at other times, thoughtfully pursued accountability conversations that resulted in disaster. I was not aware until I started reading the text that a method exists for achieving success with accountability conversations. Also, I was unaware that my viewpoint and preconceptions could be the reason why some of my accountability conversations have gone wrong. I did not hold myself accountable to preparation before I held others accountable to their infractions!

We as Marines need to know when it is appropriate to ask questions. A sign of leadership is the ability to fill in the gray areas with intuition and without someone holding our hands at every turn. Another take away from this lesson is recognizing when we have Marines who we can delegate a mission or task to and they will be able to finish it quickly and correctly. As stated in the story these people are hard to come by and they are irreplaceable recourses. Leaders need to seek out these people and keep them close at hand. Most would say it isn’t what you are given but how you use what has been given to you. This would be a prime example that that isn’t always the case. Remember there are always exceptions to nearly every rule. We must never let our judgment get clouded we need to keep our ears and eyes open to developments taking places especially in our subordinates and leaders above us. Situational awareness caries onto our professional relationships as

Accountability can be broken down into many categories, or facets, when it pertains to how it impacts the Army and its personnel. Whether it is accountability of the individual, accountability of their gear, or accountability of their actions. It is a skill that takes time to master and plays a direct role in the growth of an individual from the lowest of ranks to the highest. A soldier who is unaccountable in any one of these categories can have drastic consequences in their professional growth and can affect their standing amongst their peers. Soldiers are always in competition with those around them and this skill, when used effectively, can be the difference between first and second place.

Recognizing Marines who in the face of difficult decisions exhibit the courage to face the situation and exert a positive outcome has positive effects on the unit. The situation surrounding Sergeant Mitchell illustrates how rewarding an individual can have a positive effect on a unit. Lance Corporal Bowers could have continued past Sergeant Mitchell’s door; however, Lance Corporal Bowers acquired enough courage to face a sergeant, outside of his section, to prevent the possible loss of a Marine. Lance Corporal Bowers’ leadership chose to recognize him for his actions in front of the entire unit and afterwards had a genuine discussion about suicide and suicide attempts. Over the next few months, Marines from private to chief warrant officer chose to talk to their leadership about suicidal thoughts they were dealing with. When asked why they came forward, the consensus among these Marines was the leadership genuinely cared and would not jeopardize their career over how they were

blueprint that drives the Marine Corps and its mission. The development of these traits can

Marines in the past have lost their lives from just as simple as not being accounted for. Marines never take this serious because a lot of people in today’s day of age are always just assuming their numbers are up. That factor is where leadership and responsibility fall into play. “On the night of 30 August 1988, Lcpl Rother was posted alone as a road guard/guide along a desolate trail. In order to guide the Battalions midnight training movements, he was posted on the last of a 3day live fire training exercise the concluded the Battalions training package.” (Almazan) This Marine was still posted 40 hours after he should have gotten relieved. The Marines in in the unit just assumed that Lcpl Rother got picked up and the platoon sergeants had an all hands formation and they all reported “All present”. “At approximately 1730 on 1 September, a weapons inventory highlighted the fact that Lcpl Rother had not been seen in 2 days. From where his remains were found, Lcpl Rother could have seen US Highway 66 (National trails highway) 2 miles away.” (Almazan). This article clearly shows the importance of being accounted for and shows how the sergeants of those platoons were not responsible. They let that Marine suffer when Lcpl

I can ensure my Marines know where they fit and how they affect the unit and mission. Sometimes explaining how they contribute to the mission can inspire the Marines and reignite a fire that may be burning

Staff Non-Commissioned Officers are tasked with knowing their Marines. It is one of the Marine Corps leadership principles. Small unit leaders are in the best position to identify the specific areas that need to be developed in their Marines. While this is true of preparation for any conflict, small unit leadership is especially relevant in Irregular Warfare, so it becomes considerably more important. A good platoon sergeant should be able to tell their senior leadership were each of

The willingness to accept responsibility and to explain my actions, inactions or omission, intentions and decision. Accountability cannot be shared because it rests only on individual.

A proper definition of "personal responsibility" can be that provided by Rob Haskins that points out "Personal responsibility is the willingness to both accept the importance of standards that society establishes for individual behavior and to make strenuous personal efforts to live by those standards. But personal responsibility also means that when individuals fail to meet expected standards, they do not look around for some factor outside themselves to blame". (2009) However, given the fact that the term implies a great degree of subjectivity, for me the issue of personal responsibility is multi faceted and implies knowing oneself to such an extend as to both accept certain conditions imposed by the environment such as social rules and at the same time to accept and face failure as their own and not as a means of sharing the failure with outside factors.