preview

Andrew Leigh Jones

Decent Essays

Introduction R v Andrew Leigh Jones pleaded guilty in the magistrate court to trafficking a controlled drug and well as 12 other offences that was brought up from the magistrate court to be sentenced in accordance to section 18 A. Some of the 12 other offences included 5 counts of failing to comply with bail agreements, 2 counts of driving while disqualified, 1 count of driving a motor vehicle without being authorised, one count of driving an unregistered vehicle, 1 count of driving an uninsured vehicle, 1 count of possessing a prohibited weapon and 1 count of unlawful possession. For trafficking a controlled drug a maximum penalty of 50,000 or imprisonment for 10 years while the other 12 offences accumulative not including drug trafficking …show more content…

His report found that almost all his offending was based on his methamphetamine usage. Mr Jones also pleaded guilty to all the crimes committed and therefore was able to receive a 30 % reduction according to the sentencing act. This allowed Mr Jones to save the court money for legal proceedings and therefore is rewarded by pleading guilty with a 30 % reduction. Judge Beazley also sentenced Mr Jones in pursuant to 18A in the sentencing act which consolidates all the crimes to make one sentence for all the crimes combined. Under the controlled substance act 52 E the drugs that the police seized are …show more content…

He believed it was not in anyone's interest that he be institutionalised but did he go too far in giving him such a lenient sentence. There was little to no consideration public safety as no one in his crimes were hurt but did the judge considered that there is potential for the problem to develop tradjectly. It is evident that Mr Jones has many drug and driving convictions what happens when those two are one day combined drug use in anyway makes driving a danger to the communities safety. Offending on this volume shows one thing that Mr Jones has a very little regard to authority and for the rules. Considering all this I believe Mr Jones was right in considering his rehabilitation he is a 28 year old man who had the worse upbringing but I believe no good can come from him being realised in 6 months as he has already served 6 months of his 12 month non parole period. I believe for the community to be safe Mr Jones must be completely weaned off drugs so I believe the non parole period should be extended to 2 years which with the time already served would be 1 year and 6 months in a low level security prison. Extending his sentence will enable Mr Jones to be completely off of drugs and allow him to continue his auto mechanical course he had previously started which will offer him a better chance of rehabilitation as it will allow him to generate a

Get Access