preview

Animal Rights: The Industrialization Of Animal Welfare

Decent Essays

Most people agree that no animal deserves to be harmed or mistreated. However, the debates are a lot deeper than that. Animals are used all around the world helping in entertainment, companionship, food, and much more. This leaves many people wondering what exactly is mistreating an animal, how to properly care for an animal, and what rights animals should have. Industrialized animals are often accused of being abused. Animal rights are different from animal welfare; while animal rights concentrates on the legal rights of animals, meaning animals cannot be used at all by humans, even pets can be considered abused. Animal welfare, however, is making sure humans follow a certain standard of care and allows all uses of animals if it is humane. …show more content…

People have used animals for many of their basic needs, like food, clothing, and sometimes even shelter. Before the industrialization of animals there was a quid pro que relationship, meaning, the animals and farmers gave to each other with expecting things in return. Rollin, a philosophy professor, states this relationship was called husbandry: farmers once put animals into the environment that the animals were biologically suited for, and then augmented their natural ability to survive and thrive by providing protection from predators, food during famine, water during drought, help in birthing, protection from weather extremes, etc (Bernard E. Rollin). Any harm or suffering inflicted on the animal resulted in harm to the producer (Bernard E. Rollin). Traditional farming compared to factory farming is drastic, from the animals living conditions to their food. There must be a way to ensure animals have their basic needs, like walking or seeing the sun, but also not legally make them almost equal to humans. If there were laws in place to make isolation, abuse, unfit living conditions, medical treatment, a legal obligation of humans that want to practice farming, while there currently are not any, would bring this to the attention of the farmers or employees. This could absolutely be effective in terms of animal suffering and not endanger the world’s food supply. Rollin explains the practice of confinement agriculture—in which domestic animals such as pigs are kept in tiny crates too small for them to move or lie down comfortably—harms animals in the service of large-scale, efficient production processes. He argues that a return to the ethical methods of animal farming would lessen the suffering of domestic animals without endangering the world's food supply. Basically, there is a very easy way to be respectful and lower suffering for many lives by taking the new mentality of business out and

Get Access