Athens Citizenship Dbq

The first reason why Rome’s citizenship system was better than Athens’ is because they accepted more people as citizens. In document A it shows who could be allowed to become a citizen in both Athens and Rome. Rome allowed all people except slaves to become citizens while Athens only allowed free native born adult males to become citizens. Rome was a lot more lenient when giving citizenship which is probably one reason they boasted a population of 45,000,000.

Athens had a better government in my opinion. I think Athens had a better government because they created a democracy. According to the Athens and Sparta Document Set, a democracy means “rule by the people”. The Athens also got to abolish politicians they did not like. Athens also had ten generals, meanwhile, Sparta has two kings. In my opinion, I think that having ten generals is better than two kings because they understand you more. Sadly not all Ancient Athens were citizens, but if a free male would be a citizen if his father was a citizen of Athens. Later on, they changed that law, it was then bothering the father and mother had to be a citizen for the child to be considered a citizen. Sadly the women didn’t get that many rights but they soon they got more status. The Athens also made it to where not only the wealthy can engage in the jury service. In the Athens, you have to be an 18-year-old man to complete military training. On the other hand, in Sparta, you have to be a 30-year-old to complete military training. Basically, I’m trying to say that the Athens had a better

Athenian democracy focuses on economic advancement, while Sparta oligarchy focuses on military force. Democracy is a system of government where the citizens have the right to vote, whereas the oligarchy is when a group of people is in control of the government and it’s only their opinion and decision that are taken to consideration. Implicating the thesis that people are better served by Athenian democracy than the Spartan oligarchy, which is supported by three evidence points. Firstly, the Athenian citizen's participation in government, by voting and taking part in the government position.Secondly, the Athenian men are provided with better education by being taught how to read and write, not only focused on military training. Lastly, the Athens advancement in military protection for the safety of its citizens.

The city-state of Athens had a better system of citizenship because they cared more about who became a civilian, everybody who was a citizen had equal rights and the citizens had a democracy. With the population of around 300,000 people, including slaves only 13% were considered citizens. Athenians emphasized citizen responsibility more than citizen rights. In Athens, participating in government and making the city-state work was considered the honorable act to accomplish.

Athens has a better government system then the Roman Republic. some might say the Romans were better. But Athens is more about the people; they are also more secure. They are also carful with who can be a citizen rather then "stingy". They are just more carful.

Rome had a Senate of about three hundred men who served for life and paid close attention. The Athenian’s had an Assembly that was more casual and not as serious which can lead to a bad decision. The number of people attending was at least 6,000 but all 40,000 citizens could attend (Doc E and F). The Roman Senate and the Athenian Assembly did the same important things like making treaties and declaring war so Rome’s organization is another reason their citizenship was better because it could help keep them from making a bad

Rome had a superior system of citizenship to Athens. In general, the significance of being a citizen is that it allows someone to vote on laws, become an active part of their government, and manage their own land. A citizen would be free to speak their mind and express their opinions. If one was a citizen of Athens, they would be expected to participate in the government, go to assemblies, vote on laws, have an education, and have been in military training for two years. One would be expected to help make Athens a better place for its people. However, a citizen of Rome would be expected to bear healthy children for the Roman army and become the best citizen they could. In Rome, someone was not expected to participate in the government but

For my first source I found a chart and on (3 to the right and 1-5) down it states which citizens could vote, the only one with a yes next to it was free males. Not metics, women, children, slaves. This evidence supports my answer because it shows how much of the population could actually vote. For my (second piece of evidence is on the picture) it states. “Only free male citizens of athens were members of the assembly with the right to vote. Women, slaves, foreigners could not participate.” This evidence supports my answer because it shows that one tenth of the population could vote. That makes it just like Ancient Rome because It was based on aristocracy not democracy. I say this because in the book in section 2 government on page 332 it states “ The Roman Senate Was A Council Of Wealthy And Powerful Romans That Advised The City’s Rulers.” This evidence supports the connection because it shows that is was a very oligarchy relating to greece and it’s so called

Ancient Athens allowed all of its people to vote and participate in the community.(Doc A) If there is a man of low class or low wealth wanting to vote or be a part of the community, they would not say no to that person. (Doc A) For example, if there was a man in Ancient Athens who was of low class I society and wealth, he would be able to still vote on laws or be part of his community and his financial problems would not

“Virtue can only flourish among equals.” - Mary Wollstonecraft. In Athens, all citizens were equal, therefore a strong community thrived. Starting in 500 BCE a new idea of citizenship was starting to form. This idea was used by Athens and Rome, and included giving citizens a balance between rights and responsibilities. This paved the way for modern day citizenship in our countries and many others. Athens had a better system of citizenship because they chose government offices by lottery, to keep a strong democracy they made sure no one had too much power, and citizens in all social classes could participate in government.

Athens and Sparta were two powerful city-states, different from each other where Athenian democracy focused on economic advancement, while Sparta oligarchy focused on military force. Democracy is a system of government where citizens have the right to vote, whereas oligarchy is a system of government where only a group of people is in control and only their opinion or decision that were taken into consideration. Leading to the thesis statement that people are better served by Athenian democracy than the Spartan oligarchy, supported in three evidence points. Firstly, Athenian democracy allowed citizens participation in government that gave them freedom to vote and take part in legislation. Secondly, the Athenian government provided Athenian men better education, by being taught how to read and write to reach their academic advancement. Lastly, the Athenian democracy’s contribution to Athens military advancement that protected its citizens.

The main idea of this document is for the city of Athens to know that they had came together in times of war becoming an ideal way of a “democratic” city-state. This document can be trusted

The last Olympic swimmer just touched the wall and the race has ended. Cameras are replaying every single movement from the race and a winner has been clearly decided. Just as these Olympic swimmers will gain a medal for placing, ancient Athens had numerous accomplishments of its own. Athens “prosperity … was due in large part to its stable and effective government” (SOURCE 1). When analyzing the history of ancient Athens, is easy to see how the accomplishments of a democracy, Greek philosophy, and Greek literature all shape Athens.

Athens was very strict on granting citizenship which could prove to be a good thing. It helped them reduce the amount of power a man could have which helped keep down dictatorship and get rid of people who could ruin the Athenian

The city-state of Athens is known to have been one of the most advanced and scholarly civilizations during Ancient Greece, contributing tremendously to modern civilization. But it wasn’t until around 508 BC that they developed one of history’s most famous governing systems, a democracy. Athens was originally ruled by a select few from various aristocratic clans in the 7th century BC. These members, who were elected annually, were for the most part, the only ones who were allowed to participate in the Athenian council and enforce new laws. But like many uprisings in Greece during this time, Athens began to suffer from the same class conflict that had begun to spread like wildfire over other cities. These social conflicts arose from many political reformists such as Draco the lawgiver and Solon, who together, brought about changes in the Athenian political system that eventually paved the path for Athenian