Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama …show more content…
Not most... but all of these athletes have needs and when interviewed by Denver Post Colorado linebacker Derrick Webb stated “I fight the urge to call my mother for money at the end of each month”, and “And when you’re waiting for your next meal you gotta do something”. (Henderson 1) On the other end Morgan Burke , president and spokesman of the Division IA Athletics Directors Association(a group of 351 programs) was quoted as saying “ A full scholarship and direct support services at Purdue has excess value of $250,000.” But even though that number looks glamorous it isn’t. (Henderson 1) That money isn’t going to the player, that money is going to resources that a player may never use. See what needs to be understood is the ‘full-ride scholarship’ line is often very over-exaggerated, and realistically even though it has value it in actuality is not helping the player put food on the table. Yes it is paying for things they need such as a room, and board. But it’s also looking at things like counselling something a player will likely never use. There are expenses like groceries, clothes, and costs to go back and see family that are not covered and money received from sponsors, or a photo-shoot could easily help out. Extra money received in college could also be used as a tool to teach athletes to be financially responsible, if they get extra money and blow it on nothing well when they can’t get a meal
College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every
Actions towards paying athletes are being taken and according to the TCU Daily Skiff, “There’s a legislation being passed around in the Big 12 states to provide athletes with an extra stipend in addition to their all-expenses paid education. The idea is that these students are producing truckloads of revenue for the university and should see some of the fruits of their labor.” (Jennings, par. 2) Because athletes aren’t paid for producing such money, supporters feel some of the money made should go towards helping with extra expenses. An average student athlete has to pay for phone bills, transportation, entertainment, laundry, toiletries and other things. While the typical college student has the opportunity to work, athletes don’t. Some students in college receive academic full ride scholarships, which are the same as athletic full rides, but they have time to earn extra money on the side. If these students are receiving a full ride scholarship and have the opportunity to work then an athlete should be paid a compensation for his or her efforts on the playing field.
Many believe that college athletes should not be paid. The main debate against compensating college athletes is that they are at the university for educational purposes and playing sports is a benefit. The NCAA states, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (McCauley 10). Universities get all the financial benefits of the money earned from sports played from things such as team jerseys, sports passes and tickets, etc. Many argue that it is only fair to give a portion of the profit to the players that earned the money. It is very important when arguing for or against paying college athletes to not take into fairness, but to hold
Whether or not student-athletes should be paid has been a hotly debated topic since the 1900s. College athletes spend just as much time, if not more time, practicing and devoting time and energy to sports as they do academics. For this, many athletes are rewarded with scholarship money. However, many people believe it is not enough. Should we pay student-athletes a slice of the wealth or is a full-ride scholarship enough? (Business Insider). What if the athlete gets injured? Where does the money come out of to support each athlete’s salary? The huge amount of money being generated from college sports has led some people to think that the athletes are entitled to some of that revenue. While, some think that student-athletes should be paid, others disagree for various reasons.
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for
Imagine college athletes getting paid to play a sport, but technically they are not considered a “professional” athlete. It would be a terrible idea to pay college athletes to do what they are going to school for. Most college athletes get some or all of their college paid for, but they want to get paid in money too? It’s not right. They could spend the money unwisely and they could lose focus on what college is meant for and that is to learn to be able to obtain a job. I understand that college athletes have a risk of getting injured and they should get compensated for that risk. Nobody wants a student to get hurt on the field or court and lose their ability to compete and lose their scholarship, but they shouldn’t get paid to play for
Most people don’t know that college athletes are already getting paid in different ways than just direct money. "A student athlete at a major conference school on a full scholarship is likely receiving a package of education, room, board, and coaching/training worth between $50,000 and $125,000 per year depending on their sport and whether they attend public or private university"(Dorfman). These athletes get training and coaching for free that professionals pay $2,000-$3,000 per week for. They also receive free schooling if they received scholarships from the school. They can also have free room which means the athletes don’t have to pay for their houses. The average college student pays $20,000 in tuition that these athletes get
One of the main reasons that people believe college athletes should be paid, is because of how much money they bring in for the school.
Player’s compensation will not only, help competitors with their college necessities, but for outside food, college events, and activities. Keep in mind, some of these College athletes weren’t born with a silver spoon in their mouths; they are coming from less fortunate families. The point is a scholarship doesn’t equal the same amount of cash. Even with any type of scholarship given, college athletes are essentially broke. But on the other hand, take a second, to ponder about how much funds NCAA executives are producing off of these amateur athletes. Mark Emmert, the CEO of the NCAA has a compensation of forty-five percent is and an increase pay raise with higher insurance cost, nearly making a billion dollar per year. While the CBS Network,
Many people believe that players in the NCAA should not be paid for the sports they play, yet others believe that since they’re risking their future and injury that they should be paid. NCAA players should be paid for the sports they play but only the elite players should be paid. For example players such as Johnny Manziel from Texas A&M, Jameis Winston from Florida State and Tre Mason from Auburn should be paid for their success in college Football, these three players produced numbers this season that people haven’t seen in years, and many analyst believe that they need to be rewarded with money for their success as great football players. The debate of college athletes being paid or not began basically as soon as the NCAA was formed.
Athletes simply can’t fit a part time job around their hectic schedule of attending their sports training and practices while also keeping up with their classes and school work. This inability to hold a job leaves many college athletes in a murky situation. They don’t have time to hold a job and generate spending money for themselves, schools aren’t allowed to provide them much beyond the essentials of a scholarship--such as books, food, and room/board, and they aren’t allowed to sign endorsement deals or profit off of their own likeness in any manner. The NCAA is holding college athletes in a state of financial purgatory. To exemplify this point, Bill Plaschke, a writer for the Los Angeles Times, writes
College athletes should be being paid for the work they do. First, being an athlete takes up all of that person’s day, combining it with being a full-time student as well as all of the athlete's days are taken up either going to class or going to practice. When an athlete has this sort of schedule it is hard to find them a job to work at to pay for college. College athletes do have scholarships, but “A full Division 1 scholarship is $25,000 per year.” (Huffingtonpost) is not enough when you add in all students needs like housing, food, clothing, entertainment, books, and the fees for just being in a class. The scholarship money suddenly disappears. When athletes are under this timeline they can not work so they need to earn money somehow, mom and dad are not always there to help you out.
Student athletes commonly go to school for one reason: their love for the sport they participate in. These student athletes get scholarships from large Division 1 schools, which means things such as schooling, board, and food will be paid for by the school so the student athletes do not have to pay for these benefits themselves (Patterson). If college athletes are to be paid, it will cause unfair compensation between players who are valued or played more than others. When student athletes are rewarded with a scholarship, they have nothing school related that they would need to pay for. This can lead them to blow all of their income on unnecessary or dangerous things such as drugs and alcohol which could get them removed from the team they
Recently colleges have been allowed to pay athletes yearly stipends of up to $5,000. These stipends don’t cover much when you think about how this money is meant to cover all of the athlete’s expenses including any extra food other than the meals provided to them by the college’s meal plan. Another plus of being a college athlete is the scholarship that the athletes get, these scholarships free them from the stress of large student loan payments. The average scholarship for a male D1 athlete is $14,270 and $15,162 for women (Scholarchipstats.com) while average tuition for a private D1 school is
Opponents against paying student-athletes say that they should not be paid because through scholarships, they're already being paid. Yes, a scholarship is a form of payment. A scholarship is nice, but it is not enough. A scholarship will not pay the bills. Moreover, unlike ordinary students without athletics, student-athletes must also many times care for families and spouses. Actually, approximately 24% of student athletes are married, and of that 24%, about 62% have children. Of the students without their own spouses or children, many must care for parents and siblings.