Colonists Reactions To The Stamp Act Of 1765

The mistake of not making simple reforms, like allowing one representative in parliament per colony would lead to revolts, and even groups coming together. Some revolts were peaceful while others, which affected the tax collectors and stamp sellers, were violent resulting in the tarring and feathering of the British officials. The Sons of Liberty, led by Samuel Adams, James Otis, and Patrick Henry, were a very radical and overdramatic group, Patrick Henry would make the fateful statement of “Give me liberty or give me death.” On October 7th, 1765 the Stamp act congress would meet there were representatives from 9 of the 13 colonies. The representatives made a decision to boycott British goods. By March of 1776, the Stamp Acts will have been appealed, but the government in England is not happy.

The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 and was met with much resentment by the American colonists. The tax forced the colonists to buy a stamp for every official document they obtained. The tax was meant to fund the British army in America. Violent protests soon became widespread around the colonies. In 1766 Parliament repealed the Stamp Act.

In 1765, the English king was terribly in debt after the French and Indian War. His solution? The infamous Stamp Act that riled up citizens throughout the American colonies. But why were they so upset? They already payed less taxes than mainland englishmen, what was there to be angry about? These colonists were upset because this law was a violation of the very rights that they inherit as English citizens by the Bill of Rights.

American colonists were most upset by the misrepresentation of the colonies in parliament when the Stamp Act was imposed. In a public letter to Secretary Conway, it is mentioned that the colonists are mostly discontent by the manner in which the tax was imposed and that they feel that they have been violated of their birth right as Briton, the right to be taxed only in a parliament in which they are represented (Doc B). The Stamp Act only taxed printed goods like newspapers, but newspapers were expensive and not a necessity of life, so it only affected the rich. However, the rich were not the only ones angry about the tax therefore meaning it was not the tax itself that angered the colonists, but more how the tax was imposed without their representation.

Although there was a great deal of “grumbling” among the settlers, the initiation of the Stamp Act provoked protests and riots. Rioting, which was primarily led by a group called the Sons of Liberty, was the most successful form of protest. This group led the protests and mobs, bullying people associated with the British, “tarring and feathering” them, as well as punishing those who didn’t cooperate with the boycott of British goods. The first official protest was in October 1765, when representatives from nine colonies assembled to “discuss resistance to the Stamp Act” (Schultz 85). This Stamp Act Congress was not aggressive, but instead appealed to the crown in an effort of negotiation. In addition to this, written protests, known as “resolves” also played a part in the conflict against Britain. These resolves, as Kevin Schultz says, are significant because “they articulated the ideas of liberty that positioned the colonists against Britain all the way to the Revolution” (87). In March 1766, Parliament responded to these protests by repealing the Stamp Act to avoid damaging revenue, and replacing it with the Declaratory Act, which permitted Parliament to pass laws over the colonies “in all cases

Colonist came to know about the British have to authority to tax they also have the authority to break down the materials and their properties They felt that if a person's assets changed into now not protected, then character's liberty become also at stake. The colonists who did no longer follow the stamp act have been attempted right away without juries in admiralty courts. They all have to pay similar taxes but there is no reason for the colonist had pay the similar taxes. They felt that if a person's assets changed into now not protected, then character's liberty become also at stake. George Grenville aimed toward helping the British financially from the struggle.Grenville also think and fixed roughly lots additional into the emotions and attentions of the colonists; the aspiration to distinct from England. And the Whilst George Grenville taxed the colonies all he changed into think about what would advantage the England and how to get out of the hollow they had been in after the warfare. George Grenville aimed toward helping the British financially from the struggle. His purpose to done for that using push in the Stamp Act and the Sugar Act intimate the

In 1765 parliament passed the stamp act. Even though Governor Thomas Hutchinson disagreed with the act, he would still support his king. It is the governors job to represent and change the minds of everyone else in parliament, but the colonists were outraged by the fact that yet another act was passed. After the act was passed a man by the name of Ebenezer Mackintosh led a mob to Hutchinson’s house were they rioted and looted. From Hutchinson’s prospected the Colonists had lost their mind’s over a simple act, that would in the end help their country. The colonist had now attacked the governor personally, most likely leaving the governor with the sense of confusion and responsibility to control what was occurring. As time went on the colonist

Whenever Parliament decides to pass the Stamp Act they didn’t think about how this would affect their relationship with the colonies, they just wanted to pay off all their debt. This was a big mistake for England leading up to the Revolutionary War because when Parliament taxed the colonies they lost major trust in England. When you’re in a situation like the colonies and England were, why would you put the relationship in jeopardy? This was a careless act by England because they were already making money off them and if the colonies start to rebel and not trade with England, then England loses a major source of money. This was one significant piece of the puzzle of how the colonists lost trust in England which eventually led to America’s

Once the news hits America it causes a outrage, the colonial elite could not stand that they would be undermined. To not even be consulted about the change of policy that would directly affect them is conceivable. The Stamp Act not only meant that they were going to be governed and taxed by the Parliament but also, those who lived in America who considered themselves proud Englishman were conceived as no less than servants,people who owned no property, women, and children. This would lead to no good, soon America would take a stand. In Massachusetts, on August 14 a model of the Stamp man appears hanging from the Liberty Tree, which was harassed by mobs as a result, Andrew Oliver, the actual Stamp man, to resign.

One of the British policies imposed on the colonies was the Stamp Act of 1765. The stamp act put a direct tax on all printed matter such as newspapers and legal documents. This caused many people, especially lawyers, to be frustrated and cause immediate colonial resistance. In the same year, colonists resisted by

The colonists were protesting that since they were not represented at Parliament when the law was passed, Britain had no right to make them pay the tax. This got the colonists upset because Parliament was not following the Bill of Rights of Britain. The taxes was were little, and common people could pay them easily, but it was the way that Parliament started to tax them that they were upset.

The British developed the Stamp Act, it was designed to increase income for a British army. The Stamp Act refers to no taxation without representation. “It acknowledged that the colonies were subordinate to Parliament in matters of administration, but it maintained that the colonists rights as Englishmen were infringed upon when Parliament levied taxes without providing the colonists with representation in Parliament.” (Schultz, p. 86, 2009) Daughters of Liberty and Sons of Liberty played a big role with the boycott. Therefore, colonists decided to boycott of British products, and some colonists made attacks on custom-houses and tax collectors homes until there was a change with the Stamp Act. Due to the boycott, British trade decreased and

When they passed they stamp act, the colonist were furious and refused to buy any printed Items until they repealed the act. The reason for this was the fact that the british government did not allow them to send a representative into the house of representatives, and still taxed them. The colonists did not like this judgement and

The Stamp Act was a tax on British goods and government papers. The Stamp a Act wasn't really a big deal due to the amount of tax being paid but the actual act of imposing a new law without the consent of the people. The people thought that it was an injustice and extremely unjustified of the Parliament to impose a law without any type of warning. The British Parliament was taking into their our hands the future of the colonies without knowing it. In reaction to the stamp act, citizens rebelled causing the Parliament to focus on calming the rebellion. The British Parliament should have consented with the colonies before implanting the stamp act. British colonists were upset that they were not consented before the passing of the Stamp

The first group to publically object the Stamp Act was the House of Burgesses, who said it was denied the colonists the right of only being taxed when there was consent (Nash et al., 2008). Resolves to the act were suggested and published in newspapers, however the government did not accept them which is what caused the Stamp Act Riots. The first action that took place in the riots was a hanging of a figurine that resembled a stamp distributor and the acts of anger continued into destruction of homes. An assembly of townspeople that called themselves the Sons of Liberty ended up being an influential group in the riots. They lead violent protests in colonies throughout America and often ended up getting their way.