Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two greatest leaders in the fighting of the Civil Rights Movement. Contrary to most American belief, King and Malcolm X were not perfect opposite to each other. However, they do have distinct method to achieve social and economic equality. Malcolm X and King were both civil rights leader during 60s. They had the same goal, which was to achieve social equality for African Americans and Black people. Malcolm X was born in a extremely poor family, which led Malcolm X end up in jail because he sold drug and armed robbed others. In the jail, Malcolm X encountered the teaching of Elijah Muhammad.From then on he was a changed man. Unfortunately, Malcolm was assassinated when he was thirty nine years old.

Two different men with similar intentions. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both activists who wanted to see the advancement of African American people. Both men are significant pieces of history when it comes to the civil rights movement. Their past actions have opened up many doors which are still happening today. Even though they are gone their legacies will always live on because they were the stepping stone for the current activists that we see today. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were profoundly dedicated to the advancement and social equality for African Americans. However, they picked different paths to fulfill their objectives to enfranchise the African American race.

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character” (Frey para. 2) Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two activists who sought to bring about a change for African Americans. During a time of extreme racial inequality and discrimination, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X both had different backgrounds that affected their theories and philosophies about how to achieve social equality; however, Martin Luther King influenced the African American Civil Rights Movement in a more powerful way.

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were both important activists in the fight for civil rights. They had the same desire for equal rights; however, they adopted very different views on how to achieve those rights. As Goldman says in Malcolm X: Witness for the Prosecution, “Malcolm and King were not so much Manichaean opposites as halves in a yin-yang duality deep in the black soul” (pg. 226). King is known as a peaceful man who used a nonviolent approach. He used what he called “weapons of love” to fight for freedom. King was fighting to show people that they could accept blacks and look at them as equals. It was vital for him to find peace among all races and overcome the hatred felt for one another. Malcolm

Segregation was allowed to become an institution in the south with the failure of Reconstruction after the Civil War. When the federal government abandoned Reconstruction in 1877, the south were allowed to started segregation by passing Jim Crow laws. Freedmen were unable to gain land and became slaves to the sharecropping system. Sharecropping tied African-Americans to land they didn’t own and never allowed them to become economically independent. Segregation as an institution affected all aspects of everyday life for African-Americans and existed on many levels. Southern states passed segregation laws on nearly everything like schools, restaurants, hospitals, and public transportation. Racism

One of King’s most famous quotes in one about injustice “Injustice anywhere is a threat to Justice Everywhere.” What this quote means is that King wanted to eliminate injustice no matter where it was in his goal even though his methods were integration and nonviolence he believed that though these methods justice will come to black people in America. Malcolm X in one of his quotes when talking about his demands that he wanted to take from the white man he said “ We want Justice by any means necessary.” Although this quote highlights his methods of not using nonviolence when black people are confronted with violence this quote also shows that his goal and the goals of his movement was justice for black people in America. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King both believed that the true goal of their own movement was the justice of black people in America and that is one thing that both King and Malcolm X share in

From Thurman, King developed his mentality regarding the power religion and peace could have in the fight against segregation. Thurman’s actions, words, and book Jesus and the Disinherited all had a weighty influence on King. Thurman helped blend Christianity, social justice, and Gandhi’s nonviolent protest in a manner that helped shape King’s tactics against segregation and social injustice. Unlike King, Malcolm X did not start out with a religious base. He did not come upon the Nation of Islam until he entered prison in the late 1940s. Despite encountering religion a bit later in life, the Nation of Islam had a substantial influence on his beliefs until he left it in 1964. From the Nation of Islam he gained the mentality that black people were the original race of the world and that blacks were superior to whites. This mentality began the Black Power Movement throughout the sixties and the seventies. Some blacks began to believe that their separation from society was fine as long as they were treated equally. Others held the belief that there was no place for them as a minority in the white-run American society and that the only place left to go was back to Africa. Malcolm X also believed that the nonviolent, peaceful protests of the civil rights movement were not very effective; he believed that African Americans should have sufficient means of defending themselves. As opposed to merely issues dealing with civil rights, Malcolm X believed that black identity,

America in 1960’s is segregated everywhere and two different ideas by two leaders appeared in the black community. These two leaders helped push for Civil Rights across America. The two leaders are Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. The purpose of this essay is to inform the reader about which leader had the best philosophy during the 1960’s on topics like society, violence, and actions the two leaders have done.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcolm X are a reflection of the generational responsibilities to progress. Each generation should know the struggles and sacrifice these men went through to achieve appreciation. Each success made is a bridge that people can cross to contribute to the bettering of the United States and the rest of the world.

Many people inspired us during the civil right movement. People like Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X inspired society to make changes to their unjust system. Malcolm X’s philosophy “by any means necessary” is the best model to effect change in society. The main character in No Crystal Stair, Lewis breaks rules similar to Malcolm X and gains success. Even Lewis himself tries to take a non-violence approach in No Crystal Stair and he lost his business to government officials.How do we know that taking a nonviolent approach Like in Martin Luther KingJr’s Philosophy will help us get our point across to society. Malcolm X’s depiction of “by any means necessary” was less violent similar to Lewis’s depiction.

Malcolm X, for the most part, believed that nonviolence and integration was a trick by the whites to keep blacks in their places. He was furious at white racism and encouraged his followers through his speeches to rise up and protest against their white enemies (cite2 ).

The African-American community could improve their economics in multiples ways that could come with success but with different outcome. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have good points and ideas that could contribute to the situation but while they contrast one another they also have some things in common. Out of all the ways to boost the black economy building up ones own business is the best and is the most reasonable yet peaceful solution.

During the African- American civil rights movement of the 1950’s and 60’s, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were two well-known activists. Both men fought for civil rights, but both had two opposing opinions on how it should be achieved. Malcolm X took the more forceful, violent route while King thought civil rights should be attained in a peaceful way. Even though King is more widely remembered, both Malcolm X and King’s impact during their time has shown up in today’s world. Born on May 19th, 1925 in Omaha, Nebraska, Malcolm X had been subjected to racism early on in his life.

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were both Civil Right Leaders fighting for the same people and same right. They both wanted to achieve their same goal but in a different way of supporting it and dealing with it. One thing they did have indifference was that they had different beliefs, Martin didn’t believe in violence while Malcolm did. They were both assassinated for fighting for their rights. Both men did have completely different past lifestyles but had the same dream.

and Malcolm X, both employ similar rhetorical devices, the tone of their work and messages they are conveying is quite different for what should be done. King targets on hopeful ideals in his speech by using diction such as “now,” “dream,” and “freedom.” His purpose was to give as much positivity and pride to the cause, as to not leave a foul residue at the end of American history. He believes that a non-violent cause would allow the people to ascend, rather than be associated to the very same notion they wished to nullify. Malcolm X in the same fashion, had a contrasting purpose and speech. He focused on racial oppression to fuel his followers desire to be freed from such things. By doing so, he uses words such as “the time is running out,” “treachery,” and “the ballot or the bullet.” He wanted to embolden hatred towards their oppressors for the quickest change possible. In his own ways, he believed that they didn’t see anything wrong in their actions, therefore he wanted to fight the same way they were fighting. King wanted to approach the problem as humane as possible without anyone getting hurt, yet getting something done. While X used any means to get what he wants, forcing the change no matter who gets