Criminal Trial Process

The prosecution opens their case by making a speech to the jury. He introduces himself and states that he is appearing on behalf of the prosecution and introduces the attorney appearing on behalf of the defence. The prosecution will outline each offence and the evidence the jury will hear in proving this. The prosecutions’ speech sets out the burden of proof and the standard of proof which they have to prove in order to secure a conviction in the case. This is specific to the offence and will be based on the elements of the offence necessary to show the defendant’s guilt. The prosecution’s opening statement is a summary of the case at hand and the evidence in which they intend to adduce to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the defendant indeed committed the crime. Where the prosecution propose to adduce a certain item

The criminal trial process aims to provide justice for all those involved, while it succeeds in the majority of cases, it effectiveness is influenced and reduced by certain factors. These include the legal representation involved in a case and the availability of legal aid, the capacity of the jury assessing the trial, the credibility of scientific evidence and the impact of social media on the trial process. Due to such flaws the criminal trial process is not always an effective means of achieving justice.

Justice is the concept of moral rightness that is based on equality, access and fairness. This means that the law is applied equally, understood by all people and does not have a particularly harsh effect on an individual. In Australia, the adversary system is used as a means to achieve justice by proving the accused, beyond reasonable doubt, committed the crime. The criminal trial process has many features which aim to fulfill the requirements of achieving justice. These elements, though considers equality, fairness and access, are flawed in practice. Flaws such as the handling of evidence, jurors not understanding instructions, inadequate funds for legal

The first phase of a criminal jury trial is focused on selecting specific jurors, which is accomplished through a process referred to as 'voir dire' which is a screening of potential jurors. In the criminal trial involving an offense categorized as a felony "12 jurors and up to six alternate jurors may be chosen." (3rd Judicial District, ) Voir dire of the jury involves the prosecuting and defense attorneys questioning the potential jurors and

As Mr. Crook's lawyer, explain the advice you will give him both pre-arrest and post-arrest.

The Netherlands involve four parties in the sentencing process. The first party is a judge. The judge is responsible for the hearing, information collection, and the determination of

Opening Statement: Introductory remarks made by an attorney at the beginning of a trial, in which he/she outlines the evidence that is expected to be proven. (About a paragraph)

Police officers and detectives play vital roles in the detection, investigation, and solving of crimes. In order to effectively solve a crime, it is imperative that a series of procedural steps occur. It is extremely crucial that the steps be completed in the proper order, never taking any time-saving methods or skipping of steps. Furthermore, if steps in the investigation process are skipped or not executed properly, your case has just been compromised, resulting in the possibility of an inaccurate verdict or mistrial. Although each crime scene investigation has identical stages or steps required during the investigation process that need to be completed, the nature of the crime and evidence gathered will likely differ, resulting in the

The various stages of criminal trials is certain stages of arrest that take place, and develop to an end point of examination. The defendant is held and reasoned by question whether or not there was a crime that has been committed. A trial can be reasoned and argue the case. This is done to have a conviction of the defendant, and to be proven guilty.

The prosecution’s argument is that the defendant is not only guilty of the charges brought against him in the matter of

There also an exceptional circumstances where that the prosecution may be allowed subsequently to call evidence. This should be borne in mind by the advocate when attending the trial, if that there may have been an oversight, and that evidence intended to go before the court has not been introduced, that advocate should inform the public prosecuter before, and not after, the close of the prosecution case.

A motion to suppress is a formal written request brought in a criminal prosecution by the defendant to a judge for an order that certain evidence be excluded from consideration by the judge or jury at trial. Motion to suppress is another common tactic some lawyers use in order to get evidence thrown out which could be beneficial to the case. Evidence plays a major factor regarding whether a person is seen as innocent or guilty. Therefore, if a lawyer is able to prove that some evidence obtained, was somehow obtained illegally a motion to suppress comes into motion. There are several ways a motion to suppress can be filed with the main two being for reasons such as an illegal search or seizure or not being read your Miranda rights.

The opening sentence starts with twenty is the age when one can be ordained. This is very important because it shows the need of grown, and mature men to be a monk. It is also important because it shows that since the life span was significantly shorter back then that being an ordained minister is a short but rewarding process. In this same sentence the bowl is very important to the process because it keeps the sacred food in it and must be cleansed and perfected at all times in order for one to be ordained. The religious robes are also very important because it represents the dharma and has to be worn at all times during the ordination process. In the next couple of sentences the monk must be requested because it is a sign of respect to ones

Throughout a trial the defense has an opportunity to file various motions before any jury deliberations and the verdict. A motion is a request that is made either orally or in writing, which asks the judge to rule on something that is relevant to the case. There are many types of motions that can be filed during a trial but the motions that are typically filed are for acquittal, directed verdict of acquittal and a motion for mistrial.

In a criminal trial or a civil case, a jury or magistrate court in England and Wales is required to determine and analyze the disputed factual issues. With such a requirement, expert witnesses in the relevant field are called upon to assist the fact-finding body interpret and understand evidence or opinion with which such a body is unfamiliar. The current approach to the admissibility of expert evidence within the judicial system of Wales and England is that of laissez-faire (Akers, 2000). Within laissez-faire, a number of experts’ evidence or opinion are admitted in the jury or magistrate court without adequate scrutiny since no clear guideless are applied to find out whether the expert opinion is sufficiently admissible and whether it