4. a. Describe the mode of conflict handling
Conflict is an active disagreement or struggle between people with opposing opinions, concerns or principles. It is an inevitable and unavoidable part of our everyday professional and personal lives. There are some reasons why conflict happened, like ambivalent responsibilities, personality clashes, competition for scarce resources, clashes due to behavioural styles and unrealized expectations. Kenneth Kaye once said, “Conflict is neither good nor bad. Properly managed, it is absolutely vital.” These conflict triggers needed to be comprehend in order to be able to handle conflict systematically. Conflict handling is the process of controlling the negative aspects of conflict while increasing the
…show more content…
It used two dimensions to identify five conflict handling intentions that is assertiveness (the degree to which one party attempts to satisfy his own concerns) and cooperativeness (the degree to which one party attempts to satisfy the other party’s concerns). Competing is assertive and uncooperative. This is a power-oriented mode in which you pursues their beliefs at other’s expense, using whatever power seems appropriate to win your position. Competitive people perceive conflict as win-lose. Accommodating is unassertive and cooperative, the exact opposite of competing. You might neglect your own concerns to satisfy other’s concerns. Although there is an element of self-sacrifice in this mode, but it also take the form of selfless generosity or charity or obeying orders when you would prefer not to. Accommodating people perceive conflict as lose-win. Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative, the person neither pursues his own concerns nor other’s concerns, and refuse to engage in conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically reasons, or to wait until a better time or maybe simply withdrawing from a threatening situation. They perceive conflict as
There are five conflict-handling styles: Forcing Style, Collaborating Style, Compromising Style, Avoiding Style and Accommodating Style. The compromising style “refers to behaviors at an intermediate level of cooperation and assertiveness. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 392) ” The person using is style tries to meet a goal by give-and-take. The accommodating style “refers to cooperative and unassertive behavior. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 393) ” The person using this style tries to accomplish a goal by using unselfish acts that will promote cooperation in others by complying with their wishes. The collaborating style “refers to high levels of cooperative and assertive behavior. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 391) ” The person using this style is using a win-win approach to working with others and handling conflict. When the CEO of General Hospital, Mike Hammer first attempted to control physician-driven cost he used the collaborating style by trying to convince the Director of
Conflict results from real or perceived opposition to one’s values, actions, desires or general interests. Conflicts may occur internally or externally between individuals or groups; conflict within a team environment can cause frustration, and occasionally anger. However, conflict resolution can also often generate positive results for the team. Conflict management skills remain in demand; conflict may be managed successfully by reaching an agreement that satisfies the needs of both the individual(s) and the team as a whole
Behavioral scientists Kenneth Thomas and Ralph Kilmann, who developed the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, have identified five styles to responding to conflict—competition, collaboration, compromise,
The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) was originally developed by Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann in 1974 (Kilmann, 2013). The TKI assesses a person’s behavior when they are confronted with a conflict situation. For their work Thomas & Kilmann define conflict as any situation when the concerns of two people appear to be incompatible (Thomas & Kilmann, 1974). According to the TKI when a person is in a conflict situation their behavior will go along two dimensions. The first dimension, on the y axis, is assertiveness, a person’s attempt to
Learning to communicate efficiently and manage conflict successfully is challenging. Gaining cooperation between people is complex and mentally demanding. Communication ways and conflict styles are deeply woven into our personalities. Conflict is the expressed struggle of interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, interference from the other party in achieving those goals, and the perception of scarce resources. Perceptions are just as important as reality in regards to conflict. As stated in the text, “we encounter conflict as we compete for acceptance, love, recognition, position, power, success, and many other goals. Judgments of the quality of
The purpose of the conflict management is to allow an individual to identify preferred conflict styles according to conflict management style assessment. In the conflict Management Assessment, the collaborating style is the most aligned to my management style. According to conflict management, collaborating styles are solved in an ideal result and is provided for all involved. Usually both sides get what they want and negative feelings are reduced. Generally, the pros of this management style create mutual trust, maintains positive relationship and builds commitments. The cons are that it is time consuming and energy consuming.
1. Concept: Conflict strategies are defined by two separate means: whether something is competitive/ nasty in nature or cooperative/ nice in nature and whether it is directly confronted or avoided indirectly. This creates four categories that that accurately describes how the conflict was handled as either direct fighting, indirect fighting, negotiation, or no-confrontation. The specific topic that will be discussed is Indirect Fighting in which the situation is avoided but in a competitive manner which conveys displeasure with the situation.
According to the self-QUIZ, I primarily manage conflict with collaboration. I checked three under that category. I also checked two under each category of Competition and Avoidance. No checks under categories Accommodation or Reactivity. I feel like the quiz is leaning towards the right direction of how I handle conflict. I do believe I use avoidance and competition just as much or equally with collaboration. It may be my way of a three step process to resolve conflict. Step one; I try to avoid a situation that I know will result in a conflict or is already a present conflict. Step two; for me when a conflict has occurred, I don't necessarily try to convince the other person that I'm right, but do try to convince them that I'm not wrong (which
Each person has a characteristic personality. Such a style reflects our unique wants, needs, and values. In conflicts, there are specific global patterns that can be identified that are reflective of how individuals deal with such challenges. These global patterns consist of five approaches to conflict management: Competing, Collaborating, Compromising, Avoiding, and Accommodating.
The text book describes conflict as “a process that begins when one party perceives another party has or is about to negatively affect something the first party cares about.” There are different views on dealing with conflict. There is the traditional view that seeks to eliminate any conflict and the interaction group that seek to use conflict as a stepping stone to greater things. Conflict can arise in any situation and, following the managed conflict view, it is not necessarily something to be push under the table but something to
The desire to satisfy the concerns of others, which shows itself in non-assertive behavior. These represent two behavioral dimensions and provide the basis for conflict-handling modes.
… a spectrum of interpersonal behavior that emerges when two or more parties’ interests or positions are in, or seem to be in, conflict – ranging from avoidance or passivity to accommodation and yielding to firm pursuit of personal objectives to aggression and combativeness. (p. 381)
The competing style is used when people trying to achieve a goal or accomplish something. It is used during arguments, such as when you are arguing against somebody else to prove a point.
Conflict is inescapable, having the ability to recognize, understand, and resolve conflicts are important in both personal and professional lives. Myatt (2012) states that conflict in the workplace is unavoidable; if left unresolved, workplace conflict may result in loss of productivity and the creation of barriers that can inhibit creativity, cooperation, and collaboration. It is vital to embrace conflict and address problems through effective conflict-resolution tactics because if not handled appropriately, conflict will escalate. “If not handled properly, conflict may significantly affect employee morale, increase turnover, and even result in litigation, ultimately affecting the overall well-being of
Conflict is a "state of disharmony brought about by differences of impulses, desires, or tendencies" (Rayeski & Bryant, 1994). Although many people and organizations view conflict as an activity that is usually negative and should be avoided, conflict is a natural result of people working