Difference Between Interoperability And Health Information Exchange

Healthcare providers and patients have since been allowed to securely access and share medical information electronically using the electronic health information exchange (HIE) system, thus improving quality care, safety, cost and swiftness.

Health Information Exchange (HIE) has become a major component in today’s healthcare. Health information exchange provides a secure way for providers to appropriately access and electronically share a patient’s medical information. Therefore, reducing duplicate testing, minimizing medication errors and providing a link among electronic health records (EHR) in order to provide quality healthcare.

The Health Information exchange really took off with the advent of computers and their ability to engage in communicating with one another. In 2006 the

The advantage of the interoperability will be that the cost that occurs by the more critical entity will give the satellite the ability to have systems that they could not afford if they were a standalone entity. The ability to have the programs tested by the large entity will save the time for the satellite facility. There is a disadvantage for the satellite, the more substantial entity has programs that work well with their services that might not work well with the smaller satellite.

Interoperability is the way information is shared across an organization. Sharing information across all avenues of health care is imperative to quality patient care. Coordination between all members of the health care team can occur through a congruent system, eliminating unnecessary phone calls and paper work that take away from patient care. The sharing of information electronically reduces the likelihood that files could be lost or stolen which creates a liability for all those involved in the care of the patient.

The benefits of interoperability are discussed from many years relating its facilities regarding government and population. Interoperability is significant in linking health and human services to

In addition to communication, Interoperability is the ability to have an emergency contact, with the government. The issue of Interoperability is dangerous because of the concept of federalism is that we need to depend on the government in some cases such as Hurricane Katrina. The people needed communication with the government during Hurricane Katrina, but millions of phone lines were down. The people needed an emergency communication line to reach out to the government during these times of disasters.

A Health Information Exchange, or HIE, is technology that enables the electronic movement of health-related information among health care providers and others. HIEs are an

Interoperability was a struggle for my agency during the Oso landslide of 2014.. Governance was at the singular level with no outside commination among the levels of government and the standard operating procedures were outdated. Even fire/EMS were not cohesive with law enforcement in the same city. Having to deal with the issues of interoperability was a huge struggle during the incident from coordination of resources to communications. After the incident was over my agency worked with the city and its many departments to help create a streamline system of communication and collaboration of resources. The incident both hurt and helped the city In terms of growing.

Health Information Exchange is the electronic movement of healthcare information amongst organizations according to the national standards. HIE as it is widely known, serves the purpose of providing a safe, timely, and efficient way of accessing or retrieving patient clinical data. Health Information Exchange allows for doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other vital healthcare professionals to have appropriate access and securely share vital medical information regarding patient care. Health Information Exchange has been in efforts of developing for over 20 years in the United States. In 1990 the Community Health Management Information Systems (CHMIS) program was formed by the Hartford Foundation to foster a development of a centralized data repository in seven different geographically defined communities. Many of the communities struggled in securing a cost-effective technology with interoperable data sources and gaining political support. In the mid-1990s a similar initiative began known as the Community Health Information Networks (CHINs) with the intention of sharing data between providers in a more cost-effective manner. In 2004, the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research Health Information Technology Portfolio was funded $166 million in grants and contracts to improve the quality and safety to support more patient-centered care. This was the beginning of the progress we have seen in HIE today. Health Information Exchange devolvement serves the purpose of improving

The Health information exchange or also known as HIE is the sending of healthcare-related data electronically to facilities, health information organizations and government agencies according to national standards. The goal is to be able to access and retrieve data more efficient, safer, and to improve the quality of care and patient safety and reduce healthcare costs.

For a human services provider the ability is critical in meeting objectives. Interoperability focuses on care delivery. In the Administration for children and families, the three methods of interoperability would be the information of sharing, exchanging, improve services of delivery. The main goal would be to provide better outcome for children and their families.

In health care, patients’ lives are in the hands of the health care practitioners, health care organizations, insurance companies, and to some degree, even health care technology. The growth and future implications of evidence-based medicine (EBM) through improvement of technology in health care are important today, because health care practitioners and organizations want to ultimately decrease cost, improve quality of care, and increase access to health care (Glandon, Smaltz, & Slovensky, 2014, p. 28). One way to achieve these goals is through the implementation and improvement of EBM and interoperability which will enhance the efficiency of work production resulting in these positive outcomes. According to Glandon, Smaltz, and Slovensky (2014), EBM is an “information management and learning strategy that seeks to integrate clinical expertise with the best evidence available to make effective clinical decisions that will ultimately improve patient care,” (p. 6). “Interoperability is the ability of different information and communications technology systems and software applications to communicate, to exchange data accurately, effectively, and consistently, and to use information that has been exchanged,” (Iroju, Soriyan, Gambo, & Olaleke, 2013, para. 1). Without interoperability and EBM, fundamental data and information such as patient records cannot be easily shared across and within enterprises having a direct impact on the quality of care. It

Compatibility is the ability for software to work with each other or other devices, such as different versions of software that work with a particular desktop computer (Mastrian &McGonigle, 2017). An advantage of compatibility would be decreasing the risk of error in data entry, since one would be able to minimize the amount of data entry. For example, if a laboratory uses a software system that is compatible with a health information systems, once the result is documented in the lab system, it would be shared and with the HIS and stored in one location. A disadvantage to compatibility is keeping up to date with all current versions of the same software. This can be costly & could result in issue with performance if different versions are running together.

The trends for usability, interaction, and visualization consider interoperability. Scholars showed that the European Commission (EC) are promoting networked enterprise information system interoperability (Agostinho et al., 2015, p. 5). They are complementing research in the U.S. and Asia to become “breeding environments towards novel knowledge-based approaches that could improve a future model-driven sustainable interoperability” (Agostinho et al., 2015, p. 5). This shows the international concern for having infrastructures and standards that can interact across physical borders. The future indicates increasing sharing of knowledge and resources, in order to come up with standards and systems that