preview

Does Abigail Williams Present Mass Hysteria In The Crucible

Decent Essays

By 1693, over two hundred people were accused of witchcraft in Massachusetts. Arthur Miller’s historical fiction play, The Crucible, documents this dark period of American history and exposes the hysteria that poisons Salem. Although the entire town participates in creating this gratuitous hysteria, several characters significantly further it. Abigail Williams encourages mass hysteria by accusing innocent people, much of which is caused by her unwillingness to tolerate those who disobey her. Similarly, Reverend Parris is intolerant of those who are accused of not conforming with the church, allowing no opportunity for the accused to successfully deny engaging in witchcraft. Likewise, Judge Danforth’s intolerance of having a tarnished reputation …show more content…

This intolerance is first revealed when Giles shows the court he has evidence that some witchcraft accusations are false. Danforth, fearing his reputation will be tarnished, dismisses the value of this proof. This choice allows still more people to be executed and for hysteria to thrive. Danforth also displays his intolerance through his extensive questioning of Mary Warren. Despite that Mary is clearly telling the truth, he treats her as a criminal. This causes Mary to lie once again and accuse Proctor of bewitching her. While with more tolerance of Mary’s proposition the trials could have ended, Danforth allows the hysteria to continue breeding. The final instance in which Danforth’s intolerance is represented occurs when he refuses to let Proctor confess without signing a paper, stating “ ‘you will give me your honest confession in my hand, or I cannot keep you from the rope’ ” (Miller 4.144). This confession would save John’s life, but Danforth’s intolerance forced the people of Salem to witness a well esteemed man be killed, increasing the hysteria. Danforth’s intolerance of those who defy the court only increases the hysteria in

Get Access