preview

Equal Employment Opportunity Commissions (EEOC)

Decent Essays

The United Stated is a melting pot. People came from with different background, ethnicity, races, and color of skins joining the workforce. The country has recognized the dynamic perspective and set laws to protect the people. Under the Title VII, The Equal Employment Opportunity Commissions (EEOC) prohibits to discriminate base on race, sex, religion, and national origin in the work place. In this scenario:
Happy B. White Ltd. is a computer software firm with 50 employees -- 45 are white and 5 Hispanic. After enjoying five years of growth the firm suddenly experienced hard economic times and decided it had to lower expenses by terminating five employees. Hap B. White, the white male Company President, had never experienced layoffs in his …show more content…

The written or oral statement was understood on the certain point of views between two people. In this scenario, the office manager, Gradys Plainbread, was let Juan and other four Hispanic go with full intention of understanding what the boss, Hap, had asked her to do. Hap said to Gladys that “regarding the terminations, when times are tough, we have to watch out for our own. Am I understood?”(UMUC, scenario, fall 2015). With the harassment from her boss, Gladys had afraid for her job and condoned all the facts firing Juan and the rest of Hispanic workers. It left the firm with all white employees. Statistically evidence was strongly suggested, the company intended to keep only the white workers, one race. The laws also inquires of have at least 80% statically diversity to align the EEOC‘s code of conduct (EEOC, feb 8th 2011). The boss, Happy could not bring the firm up to EEOC’s diversity code. There was no explanation for what he had implied to Gladys but racial discrimination. He could argue because of the clientele the project will need only who could really do the job, speaking the Anglo accents, but he had no prove or reasons for firing all the Hispanic workers. Juan was senior and been in the company for long time. During hiring process, the firm had not noticed him the need …show more content…

It was clear with fact and evidences to prove the case. The evidences were mostly obvious and would not cloud the judgments in this theory. In the other hand, the disparate impact theory, the plaintiff must prove their points. Evidences could be there, but wrongly represent them the judgment could go different ways. In this theory, plaintiff must be very careful with their words, examining all the situations before present the

Get Access