preview

Examples Of Chris Mccandless Flaws In Into The Wild

Decent Essays

Chris’ Fatal Flaws In the nonfiction book Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer, Chris McCandless hikes into the Alaskan wilderness to become closer to nature and disconnect himself from society. However, while he was in the wild, he made several mistakes that ultimately led to his premature death. I believe Chris was responsible for his own death, due to the unnecessary risks he decided to take when he went into the wild and his inability to prepare appropriately for the undertaking. In the end, his luck finally ran out, and his naivety and ill-preparedness finally resulted in his death. Contrary to my opinion, many readers are eager to exonerate Chris of his responsibility because they believe the circumstances of his death were beyond …show more content…

In most cases, Chris threw caution to the wind to pursue delusional, naive dreams of “being one with the wild”. Even his possibly “exonerating” decisions were still exceptionally irresponsible when looking at the bigger picture. One of these such decisions was when Chris first crossed Teklanika River. “To McCandless’s inexperienced eye, there was nothing to suggest” that the river would flood and trap him (163). Readers who are eager to exonerate Chris may say that he would have to be an experienced naturalist to know that the river would flood, but I hardly believe that Chris’ ignorance of the wild’s weather patterns is a reason to exonerate him. Anyone hoping to survive in the wild must be an experienced naturalist. He should have studied more about the Alaskan wilderness before blindly blundering into disaster. The same theme of Chris’ possibly “exonerating” decisions crumbling when looking at the bigger picture continues on to when he killed himself with the poisonous, moldy potato seeds. Some readers say that Chris isn't responsible for the deadly mold that grew on his food, but he was storing these seeds in “damp, unclean ziploc bags- an excellent culture for the proliferation of mold”(194). I believe that everyone, not just naturalists, should know not to store food in damp, dirty places. This is simply common sense, but evidently …show more content…

In these instances it is by luck alone that Chris does not end up suffering an even earlier death. The most obvious example of Chris’ naivety is why he even began his journey in the first place. He had read many books by Jack London, but “he seemed to forget they were works of fiction”(44). These fictitious tales of the “beautiful, white North” gave him false ideas of what the Alaska really was, and how dangerous it could really be. He lacked the common sense to realize that these books weren’t really an accurate depiction of what his journey would actually be like. Throughout the entire book, Chris also shows an inability to prepare for his expeditions. Most prominent of these instances is Chris’ failure to bring the appropriate supplies for his trip through the stampede trail. “He wasn’t carrying anywhere near as much food and gear as you’d expect”(4). Chris’ naive dream to live on next to nothing in the wild is simply idiotic. Not only did he pack far too little to survive, but he refused to accept Gallien’s expert advice or even an offer of better supplies. Even an experienced hunter such as Gallien couldn’t imagine living in the wild with as little as Chris brought, so how could Chris, an inexperienced kid from California, be expected to survive with only 10

Get Access