preview

Film Analysis - Analyze This Essay

Decent Essays

Analyze This Analyze This is a hilarious, feel good movie about two men from different backgrounds living completely opposite lifestyles. Through a series of very funny, random and bizarre moments they form a memorable friendship together. The movie came to theatres in 1999, was directed by Harold Ramis and included a cast full of some of Hollywood’s brightest stars. It begins with two gangsters leaving a café, discussing their plans to attend a meeting involving the countries major crime bosses. One gangster goes back in the café to get a toothpick and at the same time the other gangster is killed from a drive-by shooting. The movie’s plot is based upon the surviving gangster seeking out a psychiatrist to help with his emotional …show more content…

Vitti uses intimidation and even comes very close to threatening Dr. Sobel life, when this doesn’t work he breaks down in tears and plays on Dr. Sobel’s softer side. Dr. Sobel responds to this with empathy and tries to understand emotionally what Vitti is experiencing, that if the panic attacks continue Vitti will become an emotionally weak, distressed crime boss that won’t be able to get respect from others (ch. 11, pg 245). Dr. Sobel reluctantly agrees to help Vitti with his therapy. He promises to start therapy the following week when he’ll return from Miami, where he is going to marry his fiancé (Lisa Kudrow). Vitti’s panic attacks worsen by the hour, with desperation he leaves with Jelly to Miami and crashes Dr. Sobel’s wedding. The best part of the movie happens when Vitti shows up at Dr. Sobel’s hotel room in Miami, and requests an immediate therapy session. For therapy Dr. Sobel tells Vitti to hit a pillow when he is feeling angry. Vitti hoping that it may help, pulls out a gun and shoots a pillow, then with a look of relief tells Dr. Sobel that he feels better. In this movie the audience can see that both men have very different cultures and beliefs (ch 2). They also have developed negative stereotypes of each other, as a result they respond to their own classifications of one another and not the individual (ch. 2, pg. 49). The miscommunication resulting from their differences causes much conflict and deterioration in their relationship. Vitti

Get Access