Financial ratios 1. Current ratio Current ratio=Current Assets/Current Liabilities 18,720 / 17,089=1.0954 2. Quick ratio Quick ratio= (Current Assets – Inventories) / Current Liabilities (18,720 – 3,581)/17,089=0.8859 3. Return on Assets ratio Return on Assets ratio= Net Profit before Tax/Total Assets 34,201/74,638=0.4582 4. Net Profit Margin Net Profit Margin=Net income after taxes/revenue 6,214/65,492=0.0949 5. Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio=Sales/Accounts Receivable 65,492/7,041=9.3015 6. Accounts Payable Turnover Accounts Payable Turnover=Cost of Goods Sold/Accounts payable Cost of Goods Sold=Sales-Gross Profit=65,492-34,201=31,291 31,291/4,451=7.0301 7. Inventory Turnover Inventory Turnover=Cost of Goods sold/Inventory 31,291/3,581=8.7381 8. Sales to Assets ratio Sales to Assets ratio=Sales/Total Assets 65,492/74,638=0.8775 9. Net Margin Net Margin=Net profit before Tax/sales (8,304-6,214)/65,492=0.03191 10. Gross Margin Gross Margin=Gross Profit/Sales 34,201/65,492=0.5222 11. Interest coverage ratio (Times interest earned) Interest coverage ratio=Net Income/Interest Expense 6,178/0 12. Debt ratio Debt ratio= Total liabilities/Total Assets 52,344/74,638=0.7013 13. Operating Margin Ratio Operating Margin ratio=Operating Income/Net sales Net Sales=65,492-34,201 9,112/ (65,492-34,201) = 0.2912 14. Debt to Equity ratio Debt to Equity ratio= Total liabilities/Total Equity Total Equity=Total
Companies’ Solvency, Liquidity, And Profitability Based On Current Ratio, Return On Sales, Earnings Per Share (EPS), Debt Ratio, And Price Earnings
Profitability ratio Earnings Per Share Book Value per Share Profit margin on sales Return on assets Return on shareholders’ equity Return on Investment: DuPont Model (ROI) Liquidity Ratio Current ratio Quick ratio (acid test) Working Capital 2009 2008 2007
CanGo’s operating and net profit margins seem satisfactory at 10.97% and 16.5% respectively. Investors do
BALANCE SHEET |Dec 1990 |Jan |Feb |Mar |Apr |May |June |July |Aug |Sept |Oct |Nov |Dec | |Cash |175 |556 |724 |175 |175 |175 |175 |175 |175 |175 |175 |175 |175 | |Accts receivable |2,628 |958 |234 |271 |270 |250 |250 |270 |1,603 |3,113 |3,580 |3,982 |3.063 | |Inventory |530 |948 |1,355 |1,749 |2,157 |2,564 |2,971 |3,365 |2,904 |2.314 |1,549 |697 |530 | |Net P/E |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 |1,070 | |Total Assets |4,403 |3,533 |3,383 |3,265 |3,672 |4,059 |4,466
At the same time, since PP&E increased, D,D &A had a same trend. As for Working Capital, As Current assets rose more than Current liabilities. The number increased. Also, Net Free Cash Flow cannot be ignored because it showed negative number in 1995, and NFCF is a crucial component to calculate stock price.
The revenue is $600,600*1.2= $720,720. The variable cost changes as sales increases and fixed cost stays the same, the gross profit is $175,500. After tax, the net income is $100,557.
The company’s debt ratios are 54.5% in 1988, 58.69% in 1989, 62.7% in 1990, and 67.37% in 1991. What this means is that the company is increasing its financial risk by taking on more leverage. The company has been taking an extensive amount of purchasing over the past couple of years, which could be the reason as to why net income has not grown much beyond several thousands of dollars. One could argue that the company is trying to expand its inventory to help accumulate future sales. But another problem is that the company’s
Also, according to its leverage ratios, the company’s debts are not only very high, but are also increasing. Its decreasing TIE ratio indicates that its capability to pay interests is decreasing. The company’s efficiency ratios indicate that despite the fact that its fixed assets are increasingly being utilized to generate sales during the years 1990-1991 as indicated by its increasing fixed asset turnover ratio, the decreasing total assets turnover indicate that overall the company’s total assets are not efficiently being put to use. Thus, as a whole its asset management is becoming less efficient. Last but not the least, based on its profitability ratios, the company’s ability to make profit is decreasing.
During this period, the Return on Assets increased from 5.7% in 2012 to 34.6% in 2013. This implies the number of cents earned on each dollar of assets increased from 2012 to 2013. This shows that the business has become more profitable. Equally, the Return on Equity also increased from 12.0% in 2012 to 46.5% in 2013. This similarly implies that the company in 2013 was more efficient in generating income from new investment. This, also can be attributed to the sale of the Digital Business Brand which enabled the company appraise its strategic plan.
Operating profit margin figures in the table above show the return from net sales[13]. However profit margin ratios are high enough for the 3 years, there is a fall from 12.86% to 11.26% during 2011-12. Sales revenue increases with a higher rate than gross profit so there is a poor
|Table 2 |Quick |Current Ratio|Accounts collection period of accounts |Average number of days inventory |
It is important for healthcare organizations to understand their present performance and weak areas in order to generate more effective operational strategies. Financial ratio analysis is an effective tool to determine hospital’s performance on several indicators such as ability to pay debt, capability to generate revenue, and sales performance etc. The objective of this paper is to describe role of different financial ratios in understanding organizational performance and in developing new strategy. The paper also presents comparative ratio analysis of local healthcare organization and industry
Analysing the historical values of the operating margins from the Income Statement, we forecast values for the 2007-2009 period. The executives of BKI expect the firm to achieve operating margins at least as high as the historical ones. Thus, we took averages and slightly adjusted them toward higher values. Since the declining tendency in the last three years was cause by integration costs and inventory write-downs associated with acquisitions, which already have been completed. To the EBIT, estimated by using those margins, subtract the taxes, Capex, adjust for Depreciation, Amortization and change in Working capital. The capital expenditures were just over $10m on average per year. The company is expecting the Capex remain modest. Thus, we assumed a Capex of $10m for the next three years. We estimated Net Working Capital by using the average ratio of NWC/Net income of the last three years.
Several financial ratios can be considered when looking at a company’s economic performance. However, given all the possibilities it is important to focus on a few key areas that are functionally related. Therefore, for the purpose of analyzing Halliburton’s financial position as well as its competitors, some common ratios can be used such as current ratio, debt-to-total assets, inventory turnover, average collection period, net profit margin, and return on total assets (ROA).
Computed: PPE = $6876M / $21,695M = 31.7% Intangible assets = $4041M / $21,695M = 22% Computed: $3,374M / $4,841 = 70% Computed: Accounts payable = $4461M / $13,021M = 34.2% Long-term debt = $2651M / $13,021M = 20.4% Computed: Long-term investments = $8214M / $22,417M = 36.6% Current assets = $7171M / $22,417M = 32%