preview

How Did Colonists Respond To The Boston Tea Party

Decent Essays

Question: How did Colonists response to the Tea Act contribute to the Boston Tea Party? Thesis: The Boston Tea Party was not only a catalyst for the Revolutionary war, but the dawn of the American spirit as we know it. Introduction: In 1773 British Parliament imposed the Tea Act on American colonists. The primary goals of this act were to bail out the East India Company which was financially struggling at the time, reduce the surplus of tea that they held, and undercut the price of illegal tea sold on Americas black market. Although the tea act reduced the price of tea for America, colonists remained outraged at the audacity of Parliament to impose on the purchase of tea. Colonists, feeling bogged down as a result of the taxes the crown …show more content…

This event was later called the Boston Tea Party. On one hand, it is understood why the colonists reacted the way that they did. The creed "Taxation without representation" was very important to them. Why was Parliament passing so many taxing acts? Even in the event of an act that was designed to give a discount, why did they not have any say in the matter. On the other hand, Parliament sent soldiers from their homeland to defend the colonies from invasion during the seven years' war (French-Indian war) and that was extremely costly for them. The crown needed to pass taxes to recoup all the money that was spent on their behalf. This event is substantial, and it is the beginning of the American revolution. Was the Boston Tea Party a catalyst for the Revolutionary …show more content…

This was well after the Seven Years' war and there were a huge number of assessments and obtrusive acts being passed to recover the cash spent by Great Britain amid the costly war. A ton of the things saddled were merchandise that were utilized all the time by the colonists. The sugar demonstration of 1763 saw sugar being burdened 3 pence per gallon. It additionally expanded expenses on different merchandise dispatched to provinces that were from different nations other than Britain. The cash demonstration of 1751 and 1764 after it saw Parliament passing a law that restricted pilgrims from issuing their own type of money. These were only a couple of the acts that went before the tea acts of 1773 and they drew extraordinary shock from the settlers. "No taxation without representation" was a trademark that homesteaders embraced to express their grievance with the act of taxing them so intensely. Amid this time, the colonists did not feel as though they were by and large appropriately spoke to by Parliament. They didn't have anybody that held a seat in parliament to speak to the issues that they faced all the time. So why were they passing these meddling acts on them? It was an inquiry that was not being replied through the best possible

Get Access