The dawn of 2017 saw the first created human-pig chimera. In Cell, scientists reported to have created the chimera by injecting pig embryos with human stem cells. While this scientific breakthrough offers a potential solution to the organ shortage problem, is creating human-pig chimeras an ethical solution?
Despite medical and technological advances, the demand for organs continues to be greater than the supply. “On average, 22 people die each day while waiting for a transplant, [and although] 95% of U.S. adults support organ donation, only 48% are actually [registered] as donors.”
Proponents of creating human-pig chimeras for organ transplantation argue that once this breakthrough is perfected, medicine will no longer need to rely solely
…show more content…
This question depends entirely on whether human-pig chimeras qualify as being human or not. “Currently, there are few restrictions on the patenting of life forms and human tissues in the United States. [While human beings are not patentable under the Constitution, in Diamond v. Chakrabarty, the Supreme Court held that man-made organisms not found in nature are patentable.] Under this rule, the Board of Patent Appeals in Ex parte Allen held that multicellular animals [are] also patentable.” What this means, is that instead of focusing on sentient life and insentient matter, the Court chose to distinguish what occurs in nature from what occurs as a byproduct of human intervention. Furthermore, it is an open legal question as to whether human-animal chimeras are patentable if human-animal chimeras are considered to be partially …show more content…
While the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) “maintains social media channels to share information with” the public, this tool can be better utilized. One way to accomplish this is by relaunching the Facebook organ donor initiative. In 2012, “Facebook agreed to alter its timeline platform to allow members to specify their status as an organ donor…[Facebook also] provided the member with a link to officially register, access more information and a message inviting a member’s friends to donate.” This platform was a success and should also be launched on Twitter, LinkedIn, and photos about the platform could be showed on Instagram.
Aside from these state level approaches, 3D printing offers a promise for increasing available organs. This promise was validated in 2016, when a toddler from Northern Ireland became the “first to have a life-saving adult kidney transplant, using 3D printing.” While much work still needs to be done, printed organs, in addition to other proposed solutions, are alternatives to creating human-pig chimeras for organ transplantation.
While some view the use of human-pig chimeras as a solution to the organ shortage problem, the demand for organs should “not dictate the solution.” Instead of continuing to manipulate animals and cause them to suffer even further by the hands of human beings, we should try to find alternative solutions
The essay, “Slouching Toward Chimeras,” by Jeremy Rifkin addresses the moral dilemma of biological engineering between different species; including, the constant genome in these experiments- Homo sapiens (humans). Chimerism is the genetic engineering of two different species to create a hybrid offspring that contains the genetic code from both parents. This is an idea that has been around since the Ancient greek, however, it has not become reality until recently. One of the large controversies surrounding chimerism is the re-combination of the human gene with a different species, giving that hybrid human characteristics- depending on the gene inserted, the traits can be expressed physically of mentally. The main reason for chimeras with part
Today we are in great need of a solution to solve the problem of the shortage of human organs available for transplant. The website for Donate Life America estimates that in the United States over 100 people per day are added to the current list of over 100,000 men, women, and children that are waiting for life-saving transplants. Sadly enough, approximately 18 people a day on that list die just because they cannot outlive the wait for the organ that they so desperately need to survive. James Burdick, director of the Division of Transplantation for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services confirms, “The need for organ transplants continues to grow and this demand continues to outpace the supply of transplantable organs”. The
“6,935 people are dying because they had to wait. That’s 19 people dying per day for an entire year”(Barry). That’s nearly 7,000 lives; which is equivalent to to almost 25% of the current undergraduate body here at UW-Madison. According to Dr. Chris Barry, a transplant surgeon and researcher at the University of Rochester Medical Center, “19 people die per day on the organ donor recipient list because there aren’t enough people signing their organ donor consent forms”. He proposes that we need to increase people's knowledge and tear down the myths and barriers of organ donation to facilitate their decision to donate.
Recent medical advances have greatly enhanced the ability to successfully transplant organs and tissue. Forty-five years ago the first successful kidney transplant was performed in the United States, followed twenty years later by the first heart transplant. Statistics from the United Network for Organ Sharing (ONOS) indicate that in 1998 a total of 20,961 transplants were performed in the United States. Although the number of transplants has risen sharply in recent years, the demand for organs far outweighs the supply. To date, more than 65,000 people are on the national organ transplant waiting list and about 4,000 of them will die this year- about 11 every day- while waiting for a chance to extend their life through organ donation
The medical industry had been achieving more in the stage of medical advancements, though they are still in the early phase. Artificial organs have been one of those achievements. Although they have achieved such, artificial organs are not perfect. Most doctors as well as patients would prefer to replace a dying organ with a compatible human organ, rather than with an artificial or animal organ. Yet due to a there being less organs donated than recipients, artificial and animal organs are becoming more common in transplants. Most of this issue is because people are unaware of how organ donation works, the organs that can be donated, how many people are in need, and the advancements that have happened in the field. Organ donation saves hundreds of lives every year, but many lives are recklessly lost due to a shortage of organ donors.
Thesis statement: The need is constantly growing for organ donors and it is very simple to be an organ donor when you die.
Deeply entrenched within society is the idea that we are continually advancing and developing in all sorts of ways, but mainly for the benefit of human vitality. In Oryx and Crake, one of the experiments the scientists and researchers focuses on is their pigoon project, where they can “grow an assortment of foolproof human-tissue organs in transgenic knockout pig hosts” (22). The pigs are genetically modified by inserting human cells into them so they can internally reproduce the same organs as humans do, and are also inserted with spliced genes to “fend off attacks by
There are some scientists in the US trying to make embryos that are part human and part animal. The goal of the embryos (chimeras) is to help people with a range of diseases. The problem is the ethical issue. Some worry that the making of the embryos takes away from the sense of humanity that humans have. (At the time of the article) The National Institute of Health stopped funding for the project until the ethical issues were taken care of. Even after that, some scientists carried on with funding from other sources. Pablo Ross, a reproductive biologist at UC Davis, showed how he was trying to make a pancreas that could be transplanted into those with diabetes. So there are a few steps that Ross took to make this happen. The first is to remove
In a world where life expectancy has increased tremendously over the last century because of new technology and medical procedures, we find humanity ever pushing the boundaries on what it can do to prevent loss of life where possible. One example is the area of organ donation and transplantation. However, unlike many other technologies or procedures which can be built, manufactured, or learned, organ transplantation requires one thing that we can’t create yet: an organ itself. Because our increased life span causes more people to require a replacement organ when theirs starts to fail, the demand has far outrun the supply and the future only looks to get worse. “Between the years 1988 and 2006 the number of transplants doubled, but the
In addition, surgeons have learned how to keep increasingly patients alive longer and how to make more people eligible for transplants. Still, there are shortage of organs donation. According to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), a non-profit, scientific and educational organization, organizes transplant registration. 3448 people died in 1995 because organs were not available for them in time. A third to a half of all people on waiting lists die before an organ can be found for them. This shortage raises several difficult ethical problems. How should the limited supply of organs be distributed? Should donors be encouraged to donate by the use of financial incentives? Opponents of the sale of organs point out that the inevitable result will be further exploitation of poor people by the
Main Point 1: Organ donation is such a simple and selfless action one takes to save the lives of others. Now much of what we will we discuss, also applies to living donation, but we will focus on deceased donation. The number of patients waiting for organs far exceeds the number of people who have registered to become organ donors. According to UNOS, every 10 minutes, a new name is added to the national transplant list. 20 people die everyday from the lack of available organs. Just one deceased person, can save up to 8 lives, 9 lives if you split the liver. Now if you donate tissues, you can improve the lives of up to 50 people! The need for organ donation is growing every minute. You can see why we need to register.
With all the good that may be on the way with the present findings, the ethical issues and potential for abuse of this knowledge is both heavy on the heads of scientists. In the 1998 article by Rick Weiss, the “human-animal chimera” seems off limits, however the research is now well underway. The article was published in the Washington Post and shows how we have strayed from our original intent:
Healey, (2008) argues that the demand for organs for transplants is outpacing the available supply of organs. Between 1995 and 2005 the demand for organs increased 121% while the supply increased by only 45% (Healey, 2008). This left over 50,000 people waiting for the availability of an organ that would
Physicians today are faced with a growing list of patients awaiting transplants for organs that have failed, but there are not enough donors to meet these needs. Countries all over the world have a “human organ shortage” and the waiting lists for organ transplants only seem to grow longer (Melo 427). In the United States 62,000 patients needed a kidney, liver, or pancreatic transplant in the year 2001. Xenotransplantation, which refers to the transplantation of organs, cells, or tissues from animal species into human beings, has been heralded as a promising technology that will help us save more lives and lessen the dire shortage of transplantable organs.
Think of all the possible benefits that make many scientists prepared to cross those ethical boundaries: Firstly, couples who have tried a long time for identical twins, triplets (or even quintuplets!) may now be able to have them by producing clones from a single embryonic cell. Secondly, the cloning of genetically altered cells or