Importance or Accountability in the Us Army Essay

Ethics Theory for the Military Professional by Chaplin (COL) Samuel D. Maloney illustrates the complex ethical decision making process. Army Leaders are responsible for professionally, and ethically develop subordinates. Developing unethical subordinates in a zero defect Army is a leadership challenge. Goal-Oriented Aspirations, Rule-Oriented Obligations, and Situation-Oriented Decisions provide leaders an understanding of the ethical decision making process. The first step to Professionally developing subordinates is identifying, and providing input on all subordinate goals. Leaders are obligated to enforce rules and regulations. Understanding subordinate character provides leaders with the information to evaluate a soldier’s integrity. However,

When that happens the unit fails the mission and people could and would get hurt. Imagine being in an authoritative position in a war. Now imagine if your subordinates didn’t follow the orders you put out to them. You just imagined chaos right? In my opinion there is no limit to the chaos that could happen if just one soldier didn’t follow the orders given to him or her.

The US Army values soldiers that are accountable for their actions. Being accountable means being dependable; arriving to work and appointments on time, meeting deadlines, being in the right place at the right time and doing the right thing at the right time. Morning formation is the most imprtant formation of the day. It is made to get accountability of everyone and to put out any information that needs to be addressed. Without having accountability there is no way of knowing where soldiers are or whats going on. Not only does accountability matter in formation, but it is also imperative to have accountability if all of your weapons and sensitive items.

This authority determines the future of the force, and as stewards of the profession, it is our responsibility to continuously earn the trust of the civilian populace. The American people have a foundational, but fragile, basis of trust with the Army earned over decades of service. Unprofessional behavior and unethical actions have negative impacts on the fragile trust relationship. Thus, we must perform, “our duty every day in a manner that the American people judge to be ethical according to the beliefs and values enshrined in the Nation’s founding documents” (citation needed).

There will be less unplanned outages and work. They will begin to move from the reactive mode of operation to being proactive. When this happens, the subordinates will start to police their own ranks and eliminate subversive behavior before it ever happens. In the event of a natural or man-made disaster, DoD directives stipulate that the Agency achieve 100% personnel accountability. Normal personnel accountability begins with the activation of your Directorate phone recall roster. The following story is that of a young private in basic training. This is a good example of being accountable for your soldiers and knowing what is going on at all times. A deadly accident at Lawton's Fort Sill has caused the death of a nineteen year old soldier in his sixth week of basic training. Private Daniel Patrick Fisher was from Bassett, Virginia. Thursday, he was with his unit training on a machine gun when the weapon discharged, striking Private Fisher. He was rushed to the Troop Medical Clinic and then to Comanche County Memorial Hospital where he was pronounced dead at 3:50pm. According to Army Officials, the weapon that killed Private Fisher was not supposed to be loaded. The soldiers were doing a familiarization exercise - not a live fire event - but, since the weapon discharged, the gun had to have been loaded. It's being called a "training related incident". Post Commander Major

At the same time, members of congress and the American people are continuously given the impression that commanders make unethical decisions in by deciding whether to prosecute or to overturn a conviction. The recommendation to fix the root cause would to overhaul the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Commanders should retain jurisdiction over crimes that impact good order and discipline such as misdemeanor crimes where the service member can be rehabilitated such as disrespect, late for formation or petty theft and be advised by SJAs in the command. We also need to ensure that commanders do not become impartial when it comes to reprimanding the alleged offender. Felony crimes such as sexual assault, child pornography, murder, etc. – would be turned over to the proper authorities outside the chain of command and confined in a military prison should be prosecuted by trial lawyers as in the case of sexual assaults are

First, looking back at a Time Magazine article about the ninety-two Airmen involved in cheating scandal and I agree commanders must be held responsible, accountable and disciplined along with their subordinates. Next, I agree with The Armed Forces Officer definitions acknowledging our duties including taking responsibility, not shifting blame or accepting other's credit as my own, and following lawful orders as well as punishing those who fail to meet standards.4 In fact, I would argue that this risk could have mitigated if leaders were to adapt these three core concepts: responsibility, accountability, and discipline as part of their commander's responsibilities.

Leaders should focus on maintaining an ethical climate in the work place. In the Army there is different way to display unethical behavior, DUI, domestic disputes, adultery, fraternization, and toxic leadership to mention few. I believe that today soldiers are not 100% committed to the Army Core Values. The public is a huge key player, the public opinion would not tolerate the execution of volunteer soldiers. Through this paper you will see the history of American deserters from the beginning 1812 to present and the implications of their actions. How in the past the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) was enforced and how today judicial system is different and how it affecting our forces. The Army must ensure to enforce the standards in regard to desertion while consecutively maintaining good order and discipline in the armed forces.

There have been enormous amounts of change within the military once the mobile revolution, and other development changes in information technology. As previously stated in my discussion answer, mobile technology has impacted my career in the most important way. As a leader, it’s imperative to always have accountability of your staff. In the military, whether it be in training or my everyday office work, I must have 100% accountability of my staff at all times. The use of technology makes accountability much easier to track, maintain, and modify at almost any location.

As a soldier of the world’s most powerful military force, the U.S Army, it is imperative that I demonstrate competence, efficiency, and professionalism at all times. To achieve this goal accountability is an absolute necessity. As a soldier I must maintain constant accountability of my equipment and my team. Without constant visual and/or physical security of my equipment I would be making it too easy for the enemy to take my equipment and use it against me and my fellow soldiers. Without accountability of my fellow soldiers I put them as well as myself in danger. If I don’t know where my team is it is impossible to come to their aid if needed and vice versa. That being said it is a key part in being a

The chain of command perverses responsibility. Milgram expresses his opinion on the matter when he says “It is easy to ignore responsibility when one is only an intermediate link in a chain of command (p511).” If somebody is just a part of a larger action then they pass the responsibility on to the other people taking part. This becomes a serious problem when everyone passes the responsibility and then nobody is liable. People giving the orders say that they are not the one doing the deed, and the people obeying say they are simply taking orders. I agree, it is very easy to pass responsibility onto somebody else, that doesn 't make it right or acceptable though. In the end the responsibility of an action belongs to the one doing it. If people held themselves responsible for their

When the army asks a soldier, what is your accountability? It is merely asking, who or what are you responsible for? It is the responsibility of the service member to have within himself the desire to care for anything or anyone that is around him or under his supervision.

A good word that Accountability makes up is Respect, respect yourself and others. Speaking of others that's the next topic, to which tends to be better said than done, because dealing with people is difficult especially when holding them accountable. That being the case Respect is the best option when dealing with others and much like Accountability it can be broken down into multiple categories. Besides the obvious (Accountability) Honesty and Trust are both essential elements of Respect. Honesty simply put is communicating openly and truthfully. Trust on the other hand is accepting each other's word, and giving the benefit of the doubt. Another last two key aspects of Respect is Cooperation and Support. Cooperation as in asking not expecting,

Military ethics can mean a wide range of things. It can encompass all aspects of military conduct, from writing performance reviews on subordinates, to relations of military personnel with their civilian leaders, to issues related to war (Encyclopedia.com 2017). However this reflection paper will espouse on the essential characteristics of leadership choices, higher standard for military personnel, and behavioral traits that must be imparted to our members rather than strict ordered obedience.

Most of the time, the second option is chosen whereby someone believes that it is necessary to commit injurious actions because it will cause less harm than the adversaries actions. When harmful conduct is committed through moral justification, sanitizing language and exonerating comparisons, it ultimately sets the course as a few of many tolls of breaking moral control. Displacement of responsibility has long been a method used by the military especially, to put the blame on someone else. When it comes to military commanders, they have been known to be constantly misinformed as to what their soldiers have been doing. Implicit agreements, insulating social arrangements and authorizations by indirection are used to leave the higher ranks of officials unblamable.