preview

Interpersonal Communication In I-It, I: You, And I-Thou

Decent Essays

1. The definition of interpersonal communication I like most is that of Stewart, “The kind of communication when people talk and listen in ways that maximize the presence of the personal.” This definition fits with interpersonal communication because it implies the different approaches to communicating, and what distinguishes them (the level of the personal that is present). For example, there are three approaches: I-It, I-You, and I-Thou. These approaches are important because they are used to distinguish the difference between interpersonal communication and dyads. While interpersonal communication requires an understanding of the personal, dyads are simply basic communication between two people that does not merit any such understanding. …show more content…

For example, you may sometimes ask your significant other to get a few items from the grocery, and such an act would be considered a dyad because it is not at all personal information. However, if you also share deeply personal information with that person, such as your values, that relationship would still be an interpersonal one. On the other hand, if you never shared personal information with someone, say the teller at the bank, you could only have a dyadic relationship and not an interpersonal …show more content…

For, in such communication, we perceive people as an object through which we can accomplish some task, and nothing more. In regards to the check example, we treat the bank teller as an object through which a check can be deposited. There is no effort made to get to know any personal aspects of the teller, and instead, there is only the basic communication to clarify our desire of wanting a check deposited. As I stated earlier such communication is a dyad and not interpersonal communication because there is no effort to understand the personal information of the other. Therefore, in order to classify something as interpersonal communication, the other person should be treated as a person, and not simply an object through which a task can be

Get Access