preview

Lamb To The Slaughter Comparative Essay

Decent Essays

Thesis: In both “Lamb to the Slaughter” and “A Jury of Her Peers”, evidence was destroyed to keep the murder confined, but the two wives had different motives for murdering their husbands, and the stories took place in different time periods. One similarity between the two stories, “Lamb to the Slaughter” and “A Jury of Her Peers”, was that in both stories, someone ends up destroying evidence. In “Lamb to the Slaughter”, the wife killed her husband with a leg of lamb. After killing him, she put the leg of lamb in the oven to cook! She ended up serving it to the hungry detectives who were trying to figure out who killed her husband. It’s ironic because toward the end of the story, the men said, “...probably right under our very noses.” They were talking about the weapon used to kill their detective friend, Patrick Maloney. Little did they know they were holding and actually eating the very weapon that murdered Patrick Maloney. Similarly, in “A Jury of Her Peers”, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters destroyed evidence to cover for their longtime …show more content…

“Lamb to the Slaughter” took place during the 1950s in a fairly large city in Canada. Readers can use context clues to conclude this happened in the 1950s because the wife was a stay-at-home wife, while the husband was the one that worked and made money to pay the bills. The wife’s job was to take care of the house, make dinner, make her husband happy, and eventually take care of their child. “A Jury of Her Peers”, on the other hand, took place in a rural area in 1917. The setting was a rural area because they talked about living in an old house that had a barn. Also, readers can infer a rural setting because the house was isolated and separate from every other house nearby. We can also assume this was in the late 1910s because separation and divorce between a husband and wife was unheard of at that time. This is another reason Minnie took matters into her own

Get Access