Letter From Birmingham Jail Analysis

While imprisoned in Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. received a letter from the local clergymen that condemned his actions calling them rash and extreme, in response Dr. King wrote his own letter back defending his decisions. In his letter from Birmingham Jail, Dr. King introduces the idea of positive extremism as he attempts to convince the clergymen of the need for direct action in Birmingham, by showing the similarities in his own struggles and those faced by countless historical and biblical figures.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” in order to address the biggest issue in Birmingham and the United States at the time (racism) and to also address the critics he received from the clergymen. The letter discusses the great injustices happening toward the Black community in Birmingham and although it is primarily aimed at the clergymen King writes the letter for all to read. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King Jr. uses logos, alliteration/repetition, and ethos to back up his belief that nonviolent protesting and disobedience is the most effective means to protest

The author’s main idea and purposes are revealed by a series of anecdotes and allusions. The author gets very personal about the subject, as if she was going through the realization herself. You can see her opinion by the way she refers to certain things. For example, the author brings up an old memory from her childhood in paragraph nine. When she is describing the boxcar children, the words she uses are almost as if they were too

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s response to a public statement of concern from multiple Southern white religious leaders entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is perhaps one of the most important and influential pieces dedicated to the fight for equality written in the last one hundred years. It is striking just how much of the content within this letter continues to ring true. Numerous arguments King makes are still extremely relevant today, and it is nearly impossible to engage with and reflect on this text without drawing parallels to the current political landscape. This paper will discuss exactly how particular points

The “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is the letter written by Martin Luther King Jr. to the clergymen of Birmingham, in which he speaks up against the nonviolence demonstration criticisms by white modernists. In it King suggests that Socrates is civilly disobedient, despite Socrates’ assertions of breaking the law in the Crito, the prison conversation between Socrates and his friend Crito days before his death. Socrates repeatedly states that it would be morally wrong for him to escape prison and go against the laws, however, King believes that he is civilly disobedient. I, too, believe that Socrates was in some form rebellious to the law, and that he was misunderstood and rejected by society. The Apology and Crito are two dialogues that discuss the intent of Socrates’ “crimes;” and the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” goes along the reasoning behind King’s claim against Socrates.

Seas of glass varying in shape, size, and hue work together to form a stunning mosaic of the broken, working as one. Radiating above its inexorable admirer, the fluid contrast in such intoxicating amounts hypnotizes the soul -- permanently leaving shards of 1960. Such a piece represents the corruption embedded in history that afflicted the black community. Exploiting the rhetoric of appealing to reason, allusion, and anthesis, Dr. King stained his proclamation of civil inequality with these devices in his renowned, “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”.

A privilege is an aspect that people will rely on to have an advantage over another, which can be completely unjust. Dr. King states in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail” that “It is a historical fact that privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily. Individuals may see the moral light and voluntarily give up their unjust posture, but groups tend to be more immoral than individuals.” I strongly agree with this implication. Even to this day groups will not give up their privileges willingly, consequently exhibiting exactly how unjust and inhumane these groups of people that have this “advantage” are and can be. Due to the numerous amount of circumstances leading to this accusation, like political leaders acting selfishly or

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote the "Letter From Birmingham Jail" in order to discourse the tremendous issue in Birmingham and the U.S at the time. The "Letter From Birmingham Jail" discusses the great injustices happening toward the black community in Birmingham. Martin Luther King, Jr uses emotion, ethical, and logical appeals in order to justify his desire for racial justice and equality.

Martin Luther King had several different audiences he addressed in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. One of them, obviously, being the clergymen. Another are his fellow brothers and sisters of color. Another audience, and the reason for this letter, would be those who criticized him and his Civil Rights work and beliefs. King is using his experiences and the experiences of others to try to get his message and concerns to those who disagree with the actions he is trying to take to further the Civil rights movement.

“The letters from birmingham jail” is a very inspiring piece, it inspired me to want to know more about my roots and learn what actually happened to black people and why. Martin luther King states that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” by that i think he means that black people are a threat to justice any and everywhere and white people often diminished black people’s importance because of their skin color. " the letter from Birmingham Jail" is an emotional letter addressing the issues and critics of white clergymen thrown at him and his black American staff about his non-violent demonstration actions against injustice and racial discrimination among black Americans in Birmingham. King addresses those that were discriminative

the theme is to question what the author was trying to relate to the reader.

I liked the way you could here the author's voice in the writing, it made the text a lot more relatable and more interesting to read. I enjoyed the way the author incorporated a lot of detail in his narrative and I strive to include that in my upcoming paper. Another aspect of the paper that I enjoyed

The author of the sample essay does well in regards to focus and organization. She has a main thesis that is a debatable opinion rather than an indisputable fact. The rest of the paper, as guided by the subtopic thesis statements, is geared toward proving the author’s opinion. The subtopic

Despite both Malcolm X and MLK actively fighting for freedom and equality during the Civil Rights Movement, both men are not remembered equal. Undeniably, their approaches were different and this resulted in varying outcomes for their success. Indirect action seemed ineffective to Malcolm and he desired changed immediately which seems like the most effective route for change, yet Martin Luther King Jr. is famously known for his success. Malcolm X focused on direction action and standing up for the black community while Dr. King wanted to negotiate and was willing to wait for his equality which ultimately allowed him more success.

6. Does the writer give time to the opposing side? Is the opposing side explained as clearly as possible to show the writer’s understanding of the opposition, or can the writer give a bit more time to the opposition? Are there from 2-4 main ideas to help explain the opposing side? Does the writer properly concede as well as refute the ideas expressed in this side? Are quotes or sources included to help show the opposing side? Are there places where quotes can be used but aren’t? Mark those places where you can.