Life Imprisonment Is Better Than Death Penalty

In this paper I will be discussing everything you need to know about the death penalty such as its pros and cons. While the innocent can be killed, the death penalty has its pros because it prevents them from killing again if they are released or have escaped from prison, it helps overpopulated prisons, and it can help victims’ families get justice and closure. Not only can the innocent be killed, but in the past the death penalty was very inhumane. To some its feels right but to others they feel like 2 wrongs don’t make a right. Most people think that the defendant deserves the death penalty, but what does the defendants’ family think?

The death penalty has been a controversial topic for a long time, and rightfully deserves to be when a man’s life is in the government’s hand. Although life sentences are the popular alternative, the death penalty is the best solution to heinous crimes because it saves the government money, teaches citizens that they are responsible for their own actions and actually saves lives. Capital punishment has been around since the 18th century B.C., when the code of King Hammurabi of Babylon established death as the penalty for 25 different crimes. The death penalty cannot be seen as “cruel and unusual punishment” since it has been around for so long.

In capital punishment, vast amounts of money are wasted before the prisoner is assigned the death punishment. This is a result from the legal case that has to be processed prior to any decision made, which involves confirming if the suspect is indeed guilty. Without a doubt, this would require several months, documents, and lawyers, all requiring tedious effort and time. Due to this, millions of dollars are used in matters that aren’t necessary, whereas the costs of life imprisonment are significantly lower. As well, life imprisonment will positively benefit the social aspect of the community. Since this form of punishment uses less money, millions of dollars would be saved and chosen to go towards new schools, hospitals, technology, and other services in low-income communities. As a result, more opportunities will open to the less fortunate people, lowering the overall poverty and crime rate, as well as improving the education levels of the area. By choosing life imprisonment as the main form of ultimate punishment, the state of the nation will continue to steadily increase as money is saved, and investments are fulfilling its duty of steering the country towards

The legitimacy of the use of capital punishment has been tarnished by its widespread misuse , which has clouded our judgment regarding the justifiability of the death penalty as a punitive measure. However, the problems with capital punishment, such as the “potential error, irreversibility, arbitrariness and racial skew" , are not a basis for its abolition, as the world of homicide suffer from these problems more acutely. To tackle this question, one must disregard the currently blemished universal status quo and purely assess the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty as a punitive measure. Through unprejudiced examination of the death penalty and its consequential impacts, it is evident that it is a punishment that effectively serves its retributive, denunciatory, deterrent, and incapacitative goals.

As far back as one can look into human civilization, justice for a murder victim has always been by taking the life of the killer. In today’s society capital punishment is needed to defend it from further harm, bring justice and/or vengeance to the victims of the loved ones, and encourage psychological deterrence. As of today, there are thirty-two states which offer the only just punishment for a crime without parallel and eighteen states having abolished the death penalty.

The death penalty or capital punishment has been part of our humanity for years and years. Existed since ancient times, according to people a person who has committed an atrocious act, was sentence to death penalty or capital punishment. The death penalty begins back in the 18th century B.C. in the code of king Hammaurabi of Baylon; who was accused of committing 25 crimes. In years past, the punishments where more crucial then today, the execution procedures had no boundaries, forms of killing where endless. Drowning, whacking, “damnatio ad Bestia” which was death cause by a wild animal, dismemberment: dividing the body into quarter-usually with an ax, throwing then off a high place, impalement: one of the most

Capital punishment is one of the biggest issues in the world and many people agree and disagree with it for many reasons. Moreover, our lives will be less secure and crimes of violence will increase without capital punishment. Furthermore, I agree with the death penalty because it will help to deterrence other people from doing crimes and they will think more about any thing they will do because they know what will happen for them after doing crimes. Some murderers and other criminals will suffer more in jail. So, the death penalty is the best choice for some of them. In addition, in this essay I will talk about for and against capital punishment. Also, I will talk about comparison and contrast between (for and against) death penalty.

In conclusion the death penalty is an inhuman act of torture that doesn’t solve criminal justice. There should not be a death penalty because of the inhumanity and disregards of of human rights. The criminal process is abused and should not be used to prevent crime with the imposition of the death penalty(the death penalty 2013). There are a lot of citizens in numerous countries that are still unaware that the death penalty is a form of brutalization not protection.in the artical stating the death penalty does not deter crime they say Abolition is gaining ground, but not fast enough this is true is that state that many are still getting killed without justice being served( the death penalty 2009) . There should not be a death penalty because it violates human rights, it does not deter crime, and is a cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty does not deter crime it increases it.

The death penalty has evolved dramatically since it was first created. When it began the death penalty was not executed in such a sterile and humane way. Criminals were paraded in front of the public, forced to commit suicide, crucified, impaled, buried alive, drowned at sea, hanged or beheaded (Reggio). Their deaths were not closed to the public but were in fact a spectacle that people would travel far distances to be present for. Though crime was still a problem during ancient times, violent crimes were remarkably less than in today’s society. As centuries

The death penalty has been a subject of controversy for many decades. Many people argue between it being more or less humane than a life sentence. Some say it’s not right to kill someone for killing someone else. Others believe it’s not right to keep someone in jail with no hope of leaving, especially in unhealthy, unsafe conditions. In my opinion, I am all for the death penalty; it’s better to die than live in prison for the rest of your life. The reasons why is that it is cheaper, better for the prisoner, and if someone argues the 8th amendment

First of all, this article has more than one purpose. The first purpose is to inform the reader of what the death penalty is and how it should be used. The author then uses the information provided to attempt to persuade the reader that the death penalty is the most effective way to deter murder. He uses various claims and counterclaims to do this. In the previous article, the author’s purpose was also to inform and persuade,

Should we put capital punishment to death? Nowadays In modern and civilized societies, its supporters have decreased in number considerably. Critics view the death penalty as inhumane and barbaric. Others says that is an unrealistic and romantic view ignores the basic human nature. This report will investigate what will happen if it is reintroduce. This report will look at how effective it is in performing its purpose which is to deter others and is it really the best decision for the economy in addition to the public opinion.

The death penalty is a very controversial topic. However, to rid of the punishment is unjust and should not happen, it is reserved for the cruelest of criminals and the most despicable of crimes. It saves the country money and keeps criminals from influencing the

Prison has always been a topic that people do not necessarily like to talk about. The word itself comes from the Latin word to seize. This corresponds well with how we used to use the place, prison. When it first originated it was only a place for people to be held while they waited for their trial, but now it is the place where they are held after they have committed a crime. It is often looked at as the most severe punishment that can be given, this next to capital punishment, also known as death penalty or death row. Once you were convicted guilty of the crime that has been committed, depending on how severe it was there will be one of two choices for you, capital punishment or given a life sentence. The judge will decide whether you should

The purpose of this paper is to examine the ideas and views towards the death penalty. The death penalty has had a various view on whether it should be eliminated from the system due to the idea of it being cruel and unusual. While other view it as an effective way of keeping the serious criminals completely off the streets. The death penalty laws came existent around the eighteenth century. Most of America’s influence and methods for carrying out a death penalty came from Britain which is what they brought with them when they moved to the new land.