Models Of Relational Models

There are over six billion people on Earth today. Each of those people has countless relationships, which extend further into an immense network of relations among thousands of individuals. These relations can be romantic, professional, unconditional, mutual, or the strongest of all, friendship. Friendship is a term used to denote co-operative and supportive behavior between two or more beings. In this sense, the term connotes a relationship which involves mutual knowledge, esteem, and affection and respect along with a degree of rendering service to friends in times of need or crisis. Friends will welcome each other's company and exhibit loyalty towards each other, often to the point of altruism.

In chapter 4 of The Sociologically Examined Life, Michael Schwalbe discusses “Relationships, Groups, and Interdependence.” This chapter covers several topics in-depth of relationships and why we categorize things the way we do.

For example, if a superordinate treats his/her subordinates poorly, it prompts the subordinates to retaliate with aggression – actions are the key illustrations to the process of Blau’s Exchange Theory. Therefore, counterparts prefer to maintain balance (Blau 1964: 117) in their social exchanges to avoid falling into another’s debt. In this case, they prefer a sense of a 1-1 exchange that is carried out among a status of equals repeatedly, to the extent that actors depend on each other for the fulfillment of rewards and develop a sense of trust and solidarity (Blau 1964: 122). However, it can be inferred that social order has a wide spectrum of forms (i.e. a relationship of equality or a relationship between superordinate and subordinate).

why we form relationships eventually lead to a deeper level of connection, the intensifying and

Another theory is the Filter Model proposed by Kerchoff and Davis; they say that relationships develop through three ‘filters’. It starts with the ‘field of availables’ which are people available for a relationship where we then filter out different partners for different reasons, so it narrows down to a ‘field of desirables’ who are the people we consider as a potential partner. The first filter involves the social model where we choose people without being aware by where they live, work, have been educated or their social class. With individual characteristics not being important at this point. Then there is similarity of attitudes and values, where a partner’s beliefs and ideas come into effect. This is where communication is easier and the relationship can progress, however if beliefs and views are very different then the relationship may not move from its current position. The final filter is the emotional needs, which is whether the people fit as a couple and can meet each other’s needs.

People constantly evaluate the rewards and costs of their relationship as well as the rewards and costs of interaction with another individual. Rewards and costs can be tangible, such as money or gifts, or psychological, such as social support or intellectual stimulation (Unger & Johnson 604). According to Unger and Johnson, “if the reward/cost balance is more favorable than that of other potential relationships, the person will remain in the relationship, if the costs outweigh the rewards and an alternative relationship with more favorable outcomes is available, the person will leave the existing relationship in favor of the alternative” (604). Yet each reward and cost is different to each individual. To better understand reward and costs is to better understand each individual.

Community is built of two main elements. First, community requires communal caring. Members need to put themselves in positions where they are able to relate to other members and does everything “within reasonable limits of self-sacrifice” (65). The second is communal reciprocity. Individuals will serve other members of the community, not for exchange of goods, but to provide generosity and support. These elements of community appear in the lives of all individuals, even the most capitalist ones. Humans are entirely capable of these.

However, there are many kinds of social relationships and because of this, there are different types of commensality and each is important and offers significance in its own right.

1. In general the purpose of the Functional Family Therapy Program is a short-term family-based prevention and intervention treatment applied across various context for treatment of at-risk and juvenile adolescents to address delinquent and behavior problems in hopes to modify community relations. The specific activities offered by the program are develop systemic and individualized family-based orientation to address behavioral problems of at-risk and juvenile delinquent adolescents. Participants then undergo three specific intervention phases in sequence: engagement and motivation, behavior change, and generalization. Each phase holds goals with assessment objectives, addressing different risk and protective aspects necessary for specific techniques from professions to address family and individual disruption.

What forms of communication was Knapp’s ideal of Relational Development model were identified. Explain each stage and apply relevant examples.

I will be analyzing our relationship using Mark Knapp’s model of relationship development, the transactional model of

Social Exchange Theory – Social behavior exchange theory is an exchange between parties as a representative of consent and status (Homans, 1958, p.

Knapp’s Relational Model is the holy grail when it comes to interpersonal relationships, whether they be new or old. The model defines different stages of a relationship and at which one’s the relationship is coming together or falling apart. Furthermore, many things in life can bring two people together, it can be a positive experience in life or a negative one. My best friend Kenna and I met in eighth grade, we both loved the band One Direction, from there we were inseparable. Now we can know what each of us are thinking using nonverbal communication, which happens a lot in our relationship, the interpersonal attraction towards one another also had an effect on if maybe we were meant to be friends or not.

Alan Page Fiske catalyzed the advocacy of the relational model 's theory (RMT) in 1991. The theory states that there are four natural ways of interrelating with other people. The author established the four models in his article structures of social life. Fiske affirms that the models work together in varying combinations and control almost all transactions by human beings (Bolender, 2010, p.60). He further asserts that the models unify ideas on moral judgment, social justice, religious, political ideology, and social conflict. It also informs the reactions to misfortunes and transgression. He explains that they are the foundation of human sociality (Bolender, 2010, p.60). The four models of relations as identified by Fiske include market pricing, equality matching, authority ranking, and communal sharing. The theory suggests the four models as the first cognitive models which represent, comprehends, evaluates, and constructs social relationships (Haslam, 2004, p.3). Therefore, the models do not define the type of relationships that exists between individuals in principle; the models are not empirically independent but are a contingent matter regarding the degree of their association as they operate in a culture (Fiske and Fiske, 2007, p.284). The culture adopted by different communities varies according to the combination of the four models.

In this layer, personal and social identities of the communicator and interactant are revealed and specified. Lastly, the behavior layer describes the actions made by these individuals in response to interethnic communication. Whether these behaviors are subconscious or discernible, it can be classified as either associative or dissociative behaviors. This is considered the core of the concept. Just like a cake cannot be made without key ingredients such as eggs and flour, Kim’s model revolves around the behavior layer.