preview

Monster By Steve Quotes

Satisfactory Essays

In the book Monster, our main character, Steve is on trial for, eligibly, assisting in the murder and robbery of Aguinaldo Nesbitt. Steve is found innocent in the book, which can be agreed with as a good verdict. To clarify why the verdict can be considered as a “good” verdict we must look at who Steve is and what did he do. Steve is a considerably good person who gets wrapped up in a bad crowd and makes a bad decision. As for his involvement in the crime he didn’t actually do anything to help. To emphasis on Steve’s character I want you to think of people in jail. You see thugs, thieves, murders, and people who break the rules for their own benefit or desires. People who would do what they did again or worse. Steve contemplates who he is based on his one bad decision. Does that sound like a person who would kill, steal, or destroy multiple times and feel no remorse? Steve doesn’t deserve to be in jail …show more content…

If he were to want to be part of the robbery he would have stayed close or gave some sort of signal telling King and Bobo nobody was in the store. His involvement was virtually non-existent as all he actually did was go into the store. He didn’t look for anyone let alone police officers. If he had and told them people were in the store then he would have been attributed with assisting in their crime. Contrary to the information given, people believe Steve should have been found guilty. Their reasoning is similar to the statement; Steve had participated in the crime making him guilty. This could be considered sound logic except, for the fact that Steve’s role was not fulfilled nor did he stay to collect any money. Should someone be credited for something they didn’t actually do? Some may say yes, but they only believe this in the sense that this is a crime or bad situation not an award or some sort of positive situation. If it were that case their tunes would change

Get Access