Nora Lindsay Case Study

Approximately seven different cases have been filed in Essex Probate Court in order to dispute the issues that have arisen from the handling of Hilary’s estate. Denise also attempted to file in Essex Superior Court; however Judge Whitehead found that Denise “had not been involved in the day to day

This paper examines the case study about Sarah Burke. A case study analysis form was completed and symptoms were identified. Identification of certain diagnostic criteria were interpreted and clarified for the exhibiting individual. Illumination of criteria for proposed diagnosis lead to the discussion which resolves the risk factors and clinical features associated with the diagnosis. Recognition of certain symptoms and criteria brought to light other possible comorbidities. Cumulative risk theory, as well as, the diathesis stress model were investigated for possible involvement in the Burke disorder development. Multidimensional factors related to the onset and maintenance of her symptoms are deliberated; as well as, how her culture played a role. In the end, a conclusion is given about suggested pre- and post- treatment, overall benefits of those treatments, and prognosis outlooks.

CM Gilmore contacted KeKe Orum who is a friend of Holly O’Brien. She reported the following information regarding the family:

I would like to introduce you to Lindsay Parsells, who is the monitoring specialist for VMS. Lindsay’s role is to monitor patients and follow protocols when patients fall outside their specific threshold. If you receive a call from Lindsay, please work with her to the patient back on track.

Your comments regarding Ms. Thomas are so accurate. Because of the description and the crime in which she was charged I immediately become biased and upset. The media can truly paint a colorful picture, by words and photographs that can pursue a society to like or dislike the subject. Ms. Thomas actions were those of abandoning and endangering her 2-year-old son; but, the pictures lead one to believe that she may have mental behavior issues. Once again, thanks Jennifer for the above discussion. Take care,

Helen and Kenneth Felumee are proof that true love still exists. The couple is from Ohio. They met and fell in love while they were teenagers. They decided to get married after dating for two years. They were so in love with each other that they could not wait until the legal age to get married, which was 21.

I read the case study and applied a scale from 1-4 (1 being most responsible, to 4 being least responsible) to the responsible parties in the case study.  Here are my rankings:

Julie Stephens was born in 1973 to Christine Anderson and . She had a two-year-old brother named Denver. Her parents had been married seven years and her Dad was in the military. While he was gone, Julie’s mother started going to the Mormon church and decided she wanted to join. Her Dad didn’t approve so he gave her an ultimatum, “You need to choose between me or the church.” She immediately chose the church and filed for divorce when Julie was six weeks old.

The case of Kathryn Mc Neil deals with the issue of separation in the workplace regarding the nonperformance of a single mother whose work was suffering because of the tremendous additional burden of raising a child. The case was written in 1994 but in the intervening years significant decisions have been made by the law (in the US) protecting the rights of the single mother. The debate is no longer exclusively about professionalism versus corporate responsibility but the new phenomenon of a third gender in the workplace.

It is with both respect and honor that I submit this letter of recommendation on behalf of Diana Nielson.

Nora Pricilla Lindsay made a will with a Public trustee in December 1989 which was revoked prior to her death on the 16th of October 2012. Nora was divorced and was continued by her two children Geoffrey Lindsay and who was the applicant, and Heather McGrath who was the respondent. It was assumed that Nora didn’t have a will, therefore the appellant, Lindsay applied to the Supreme court to gather letters of administration to get an inheritance. The letters of administration where granted to the applicant on the 17th of June 2013. However, after the letters where granted, the applicant found a document stored in the deceased estates storage box, which

Philippides J believes that the document was presented formally through the set out of the relevant personal information such as her name, address, and date of birth on the heading. Furthermore, the deceased, Nora Priscilla Lindsay also used dispositive language and phrases commonly used in Wills, to deal with the substantial asset of her estate, therefore it can be inferred that the deceased intended for it to be her Will.

Linda completes her hotlines and other assignments in a timely manner. She makes her face to face visits according to policy. Her Plans of Actions are always in the cases within 2 weeks of receiving the hotline. Linda’s documentation is clear to read, and her recordings are very detailed and well written. She consistently completes her hotlines, and closes her cases within the 60 day time frames. She asks for exceptions as needed, and her recordings are well documented as to why a waiver or postponement was needed. Linda often makes follow up calls throughout her investigations to gather more information, assess how things are going, and to make sure the allegations in the hotline report have been addressed. She rarely has any overdue cases.

The main ground of appeal was in regards to the Lindsay finding a handwritten document which he wished to be declared as the deceased’s last Will. The Will did not fulfil the requirements of s 10 of the Succession Act 1981 (QLD). The handwritten document in which the deceased had written her name was not appointed an executor, undated and had multiple corrections and deletions. The torn edges also signified that it was incomplete and

First of all, she needs three cups /day dairy products. If she does not consume more than one cup dairy products (her 24-hour recall shows only one cup milk as a dairy product), she is inadequate intakes of calcium and vitamin D.