Paying College Athletes Deserve To Be Paid Essay

Thousands of College athletes work as hard as they possibly can in their sports and don’t get rewarded for their talent. The NCAA has rules in place that will not allow the college athletes to be paid. Since the beginning of the NCAA, students playing a sport in college have never been paid. The only thing that the athlete’s have been given are scholarships that pay for their tuition and/or room and board. I think that College athletes should be paid because it is like a full time job, they earn millions for their school, and they don’t have the time to study like other students.

Whether or not college athletes should be paid is one of the most discussed debates trending around the world. What do you think about college athletes getting paid? Are universities just taking advantages of these athletes talent without any reward? This debate can go either way, which is why many people are trying to figure out the right solution.

College athletics have become popular over time over the past few decades. Student athletes need to be determined, committed, and focused. The biggest trait needed by the athlete is dedication. The amount of dedication needed to be a student athlete could be overwhelming. Between classes and workouts could exhaust even the best athlete mentally and physically. Students athletes should be proud to get free education and play sports, but education should be valued more than sports . As an athlete, time management is the key to surviving. Athletes need a balance, maintaining at least 40 hours of practice a week, 30 hours a week of class time, and getting some sleep into their schedule too. Maintaining all of these aspects deserves some more credit, more than just a free education. The NCAA can afford to pay athletes, the NCAA makes about 12 billion every year. The NCAA money comes mostly from TV and marketing and makes up less than 10% of all college athletics money. The rest comes from school ticket sales and student fees from the school itself. The NCAA since 2006 profit have doubled since time has gone by and is still increasing from tournaments and school funding. Athletes play an active role in the promotions of these activities,

For the longest time, college athletes have poured their heart into their sport and worked very hard every day of every week. These athletes have proven themselves enough to able to show off their ability and talents at a university. These college athletes have a job and work too. Their job is to bring in money for the university they are playing for. In order for these athletes to play well enough to be considered able to bring in profit for the university, they must play a sport that they love to play and not a sport that they are forced to play. Over time, the main question that is on everyones mind is should students that play the sport they love for a university get paid simply because they are a college athlete that is displayed on television. My goal for this paper is to inform you of the reasons I believe they should get paid.

Would paying college athletes make them spoiled or would it give something more than just a degree after graduating? College athletes do so much for their university, yet they never get anything in return for it. They put their heart and soul into the sport, they have done for their entire life and worked very hard to get where they are now. Not getting paid until they go through school is unfair and most athletes leave school early without a degree and no knowledge of how to manage their money when they get it. Although college athletes do get money from scholarships, they should be able to get paid because their sport is their job and when they leave college, they would have something more than just a degree.

College athletes are considered to be “amateur” this is why they can not get paid to pay. Even though college sports programs bring in a lot of revenue for the colleges. The players never see any of this money even though the revenue is completely on them. Which does not make sense because most players practice and lift for about 40 hours a work which basically makes it a job. When you are working this hard there is obviously going to be risk for injury. This is why some athletes leave college early to try to be drafted in whatever professional sports league for the sport he/she is in. If they were paid and had benefits like health insurance this would not happen. So, this paper will argue that treating college sports like a full-time job would

Around 60 percent of National Basketball Association players are penniless within the first five years of retirement. Countless of these athletes point their fingers to poor financial investments, funding their family and friends and having extravagant spending habits. If the NCAA agreed to begin paying student-athletes, the financial experience could help them develop a foundation of financial knowledge, and teach these young adults how to manage their finances and carry that wealth of knowledge to which ever career field they decide to take (Patterson). Student-athletes getting paid has gained so much momentum and controversy that the issue has made its way to the federal courts. The college football players at Northwestern University appealed the National Labor Relations Board to form a union. The main reason why these student-athletes went against the board was because they felt like they should be treated like regular employees and not students. An average college football player dedicates about 43.3 hours per week just towards football. That is 3.3 more hours than the average American work week. Another reason is even though the NCAA claims college athletes are just students, the NCAA requires that college athletes miss classes for nationally televised games that generate a large amount revenue. For example, the NCAA Division I football championship game is played on a Monday night. That means that the championship game requires football players to miss the first day of spring classes, which clearly demonstrates that the student-athletes are actually athletes first and students second. Also, the annual NCAA men’s basketball tournament, which generates about one billion dollars per year, affects more than six days of classes. Another clear indication that the NCAA cares only about how much money their student-athletes

Most of us should be aware of college athletics’ plight. Over the past few years student athletes have gotten huge recognition. There is a controversy whether these athletes should or should not be paid. Even though they make a substantial contribution to their school, these student athletes are not paid by the university. In some cases they are the reason for increasing the College’s reputation. In addition, these athletes increase the profits of the university, therefore these athletes should receive a part of the profits. First and foremost, universities use these athletes as core marketers, also such student athletes’ training sessions are comparable to a full-time job, and they worked hard to get there.

According to the Forbes.com, college athletes from around the country are already paid up to 125,000 dollars from tuition to meal plans to skill training. To an economist, this is “pay” (Dorfman). College athletes should not receive pay because they already are given free tuition and more, it would result in controversial amounts of pay including bargaining, and it would not benefit the athletic program.

Over the decades, Division I college athletes have been pouring their heart and soul into the game they love. Their passion for sports has allowed them to attend and play for a university of their choice. College sports is similar to a business, especially at the Division I level and the athlete’s job is to bring profit and revenue to their school. In recent years, there has been an ongoing conflict in collegiate athletics: should college athletes get paid? In this essay, I will discuss the effects of paying college athletes, and reveal on how much each athlete is really receiving.

With the click of a pen teenagers commit their future four years into the hands of universities, in return they receive free education and the possibility of competing in their favorite sport. N.C.A.A. fulfills the dreams of many young adults giving them a chance to prosper and obtain something more in their life. These students get to travel and see places they have never dreamed of, and the only cost is to play the sport they love. Yet for some reason many people believe colleges are robbing the lucky, talented students. They assert that on top of a full ride scholarship athlete should also receive a paycheck. However, student-athletes should not receive wages as they already are granted privileged opportunities for playing a sport in college.

An important topic in the athlete discourse community that was able to show different genres, is the topic of college athletes getting paid. The debate goes on, but with two different genres on the same topic different views will be given and analyzed as well as same views. One of the genres is a video sponsored by ESPN and Recruiting Nations. In the video the Top Ten High School Seniors were asked the question “Should College Athletes be paid?” the title of the video. There are members committed to different colleges that play college football or basketball and there are also students from colleges that are not involved in any extracurricular activities agree, disagree, or even both. It is a major debate, using two different genres in this discourse community the members of this community will give different views of their opinions and ideas on why college athletes should get paid for playing collegiate sports or why they should not get paid playing sports.

Today, sports are no longer fun and games, sports are a business, and college sports are no different. Division I college sports provide a huge source of universities’ income. The school receives money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, along with many other sports related revenue builders. The athletes on the other hand, receive their scholarship and little more. While the idea of receiving a free college education is something few would complain about; when the issue is more closely examined it becomes evident that it is not enough. Universities are exploiting athletes, and recently the problems that this creates have become more prominent. More and more athletes are now leaving

Many people enjoy the competitiveness of collegiate athletics and the universities themselves love the amount of revenue it brings in each year. With the crowd going wild throughout the game and the passion athletes show, it’s a pastime that is rarely boring. A common discussion is if college athletes should be paid. College football and basketball generates 6 billion dollars annually. Which in total is more than the National Basketball Association (Brill 1). These athletes are practically working full time to improve in and out of season. They are putting their bodies on the line during game time too often to later in life compensated. Major injuries aren’t always the ones you get immediately. Down the road when athletes are adults their

Since 2011, the focus on paying collegiate athletes has become an important topic of discussion. The NCAA, athletic departments, and other corporations are making profit off college athletes and the question has become whether it is just or not. The sums of money that these corporations are bringing in are like that of professionals. Many colleges have adapted professional sports’ requirements and commitment but the problem that has arisen is whether college athletes should receive payment. Many believe that being a collegiate athlete is equivalent to a job, so athletes should be awarded for all the time and effort they put in. Others believe that scholarships and grants should be enough because paying athletes would lose the value of amateurism.