preview

Pros And Cons Of Beach Nourishment

Better Essays

Report #3—Multiple Perspectives In this paper, I will address three different perspectives related to the topic of beach nourishment. The first debate is that beach nourishment is feasible and environmentally excepted method, to reduce storm and flooding risk. The second perspective is that beach Nourishment is a costly and temporary fix. Third perspective is Beach nourishment does more damage then it prevents, it merely exists to protect the homes of the wealthy, while damaging the habitats of many beach dwelling species. Below I will show three different perspectives of beach nourishment. The first perspective is beach nourishment is a feasible and environmentally excepted method, to reduce storm and flooding risks. Beach nourishment is a shoreline protection program, which are regularly monitored there are a number of guidelines, published by the Corps of Engineers, “ Native Beach Assessment Techniques for Beach Fill Design” also jointly prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency. When starting a beach nourishment project, the company hired to do so must obtain a permit. Laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, water quality, endangered, species, and historic properties also play a role on the beach nourishment project. Along with the guidelines written by the Corps of Engineers, they also must comply with the National Environmental policy …show more content…

Dr.Pikley mentions, beach Nourishment is only a temporary fix and actually speeds up erosion. They set the beach higher and this causes the break point for the wave to break sooner then it would, which as an effect slams in to the newly nourished beach harder then it would with a gradual slope or natural slope. My third perspective, Beach nourishment does more damage then it prevents, it merely exists to protect the homes of the wealthy, while damaging the habitats of many beach dwelling

Get Access