preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Roosevelt's Infamy Speech

Decent Essays

Honors English 10 Rhetorical Analysis with Roosevelt’s Infamy Speech 2,300 years ago, Aristotle founded the basic principle that almost every great speech since then has been written upon-the three persuasive appeals. Around 76 years ago, Franklin D. Roosevelt put these principles to practice himself; giving what is thought to be one of the most famous American political speeches of the 20th Century-his Infamy Speech. While the speech isn’t complex in neither wording nor depth, it has been analysed over and over again by scholars, politicians, historians, and the like for its direct and purposeful approach. Given the day after the Pearl Harbor attack, the speech had two purposes; to urge Congress to formally declare war on Japan (which …show more content…

This may be because the definition of Ethos is so vague. Currently, ethos is defined as “the writer’s ethics, which means a writer’s authority or character to deal with a topic.” Many may see this as being an author’s credentials, such as the “Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy” given in FDR’s speech. I take this concept a little further though, in that I believe ethos can only be evaluated by reading the whole text. You see, as the definition goes, ethos is pretty much why we ought to listen to the author. For many, including myself, this would include the author’s overall personality and how it prevails throughout their entire text. So, what I gather is that an author’s credibility can really only be truly analysed by understanding the unique style of his work. For example, in his speech, FDR also states “The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here” This statement gives important insight to FDR’s personality, and his view of himself. From this we can gather that he is overall pretty humble, which, for many, could be an important factor in deciding whether or not someone is worth listening …show more content…

Pathos is defined as being the emotional appeal of a text, so it is no wonder that many believe this. After all, pathos is the main thing in the text that personifies the author and links them to the audience in a way they can understand and relate to—emotionally. One of the biggest reasons FDR’s speech was so successful is because it gripped the crowd by appealing to their emotional sides. Perhaps the best example of this is toward the end of his speech, saying “Always will we remember the character of the onslaught against us. No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory.” This sentence was very effective in gaining the attention of FDR’s audience because it created a sense of loss, unity, and hope, which are all powerful

Get Access