Robert E Lee Strengths And Weaknesses

his country(http://www.encyclopedia virginia.org/Robert_E._Lee) . His, decisions were spokesman of his army. Robert s’ successful career in the United States Army and his country could be conquered by only one set of adversity, those to his family and his home Virginia. Lee showed by standard how to accept subjugation with class.

Robert E. Lee was a confederate general for the south. "Lee led one of the largest Confederate army and ultimately was named general-in-chief of all Confederate land forces." He went to West Point Military Academy. Lee was known for surrendering to Ulysess Grant in the Battle of Gettysberg. His tactics were strong and he was known as a good general in the south.

As moderate political figure, Lee was dismayed by the extremists on both sides of the North-South controversy in the 1850s. Nevertheless, believing that he owed his first loyalty to his own state, he declined an offer to command the Federal army, resigned his commission in the U.S. Army, and offered his services to Virginia when it seceded in April 1861.6 Virginia was Lee's first priority and for him, Virginia was the Confederacy, and he was involved in the war on the Confederate side only because his home state of Virginia chose to leave the Union. His decisions of where to attack and why were most commonly based on his loyalties according to the letters sent between his commanders and himself.3 When Lee had turned down Abraham Lincoln, Jefferson Davis received word and offered to appoint Lee a general in the Southern army.5 After an unsuccessful effort to repel an invasion of western Virginia, Lee was sent to prepare Atlantic coastal defenses.8 In March 1862 he returned to Virginia as an advisor to Davis and after Joseph E. Johnston was wounded in May 1862 during the Peninsular Campaign, Lee became commander of the main Confederate army in Virginia; a force that he soon named the Army of Northern Virginia.6 It becomes evident through looking at Lee’s choices during the Civil War

During the Civil War, Union General-in-Chief Ulysses S. Grant, and Confederate General Robert E. Lee, both showed immense Leadership when facing off with each other in the Civil war. They both were strong, driven, and determined leaders to win the war for the side that they were on: The Confederate army, or the Union army.

General Robert E. Lee was the leading general for the confederate army during the civil war and a revered heroic figure in the South now and then. Born in Stratford, Virginia Lee was head of his home states military until promoted to general-in-chief towards the end of the civil war. The opinion about General Lee is divided some have a deep respect for his military brilliance while others question some of his tactics. General Lee was a very smart man not just in military terms but just in general he was quite brilliant. When given the reigns to the confederate forces on the Virginia peninsula he renamed it the army of Northern Virginia. All of the sources used can agree that “Lee was a “military genius”, a nearly invincible general.”(Nolan

Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant were two major generals that participated in the United States Civil War. Through these two military masterminds a nation torn in two fought against one another to fight the other in what is known as the bloodiest war to ever happen on U.S soil, and the bloodiest war in U.S history. General Lee and General Grant both engaged and defeated enemies using their superior strategy. On and off the battlefield these two generals had many similarities, along with many differences.

General Robert E Lee is a Confederate officer during this civil war. He has helped us Greatly during this time and hope he can lead us to victory. He is stationed in northern Virginia. He is making this army very successful and strong so they can compete with the Union soldiers. He wants to lead his soldiers into Northern soil because he realizes that his the way they will be able to win to be on Northern soil and get a victory. Robert E Lee is a very intelligent man and does believe that man will learn every day as in one of his quotes said “The Education of a man is never completed until he dies”

Thomas states in his work that Lee was always searching to seize the initiative and keep his opponent off balance. Grant may have been the master of the calculated risk, however Lee could be characterized as the master of the uncalculated risk. Lee more likely than not saw an aggressive plan as the only way to stand against the North’s seemingly endless resources. He expresses that Lee may have thought if he bloodied the Union forces seriously enough, often enough, the people of the North would grow tired of war. Thomas also goes on to write that Lee’s strategies went nearly too far, particularly when he divided his outnumbered troops, as he did both times the Army of Northern Virginia marched north of the Potomac. Thomas remarks on the battle at Antietam, where only good luck and a few minutes spared Lee’s battered army from annihilation.

Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant fought each other in the bloody Civil War, and they were respected generals and public figures. They shared some common values. For example, both Lee and Grant did not fight for violence, but they led armies to end the county’s fight against itself and bring peace back to America. Lee and Grant were also known for their military strategies that earned the Confederate and the Union numerous battle victories. On the other hand, they each had very different backgrounds that made up their value system. Lee's family represented a past era of knighthood and English squires. Grant, however, grew up beyond the mountains, and he became independent and self sufficient. Lee believed in a class society with inequality.

In the end of the Civil War. We will consider Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant to all be hero’s The two generals will earn a great reputation and will go down as one of the best generals for the years to come. These two changed todays American History and how we can know better understand how the war actually came about. We know that these two made life decisions out on the battle field.

While both Lee and Grant were two daring, resourceful, and leaders during the Civil war, they're opposing upbringing in beliefs results in similarities and differences between the two generals. To start off, their upbringing is vastly different. Lee was brought up with the ways of chivalry and knighthood. In contrast, Grant was brought up the modern age of steel and machinery. In addition, Robert E. Lee fought for a society that could endure anything but change, while in contrast, fought because everything he lived by was tied to growth, expansion and a constantly rising horizon. However, they also have some similarities. For example, both generals have been described as " the perfect champion for his cause, drawing both his strengths and

“Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts” is an informative essay by Bruce Catton comparing Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee: the most important military officers in the Civil War. The essay is about how the two officers are very different in values and lifestyles, yet very similar as the two strong leaders come to terms in the end at Appomattox. Catton first describes Robert E. Lee as a very traditional man who embodied aristocratic ideas. Ulysses S. Grant, on the other hand, is described as a modern day many who grew up working hard in the age of steel and machinery. Catton then points out that despite the difference the two generals had in terms of their beliefs and backgrounds, they both have perseverance and are strong, fast fighters. In the end, the two generals professionally behaved at Appomattox, turning from a violent war to peace, and they made history.

surrounded Lee's armies in the last battle between the states. However, Lee's character traits of courage,

Lee ideally thought that having unequal social structures was an advantage and that there should be a leisure class so that society would be keyed to the land as the source of wealth. For four years, the Southern states fought in war to preserve Lee’s ideals

There are so many differing views on Robert E. Lee, which may be the reason so many historians find him intriguing, however, he still remains very much something of a mystery. Many earlier works, beginning in the late 19th and until the mid-20th century, Lee has often been portrayed as nearly saint-like, nearly clairvoyant with his defensive actions. Modern historiographies of Lee vary from the earlier works written as they seem to look more into the man, rather than the legend. Earlier biographies of Lee interpret him to have been born in near perfection, a noble and honorable man, as well as a brilliant soldier. His childhood is either not mentioned or described as carefree and happy; his opposition to slavery is described as whole-hearted and intense; and his marriage to Mary Custis is often written as a wonderful and idyllic relationship. His working relationship with his war-time staff is frequently said to be completely agreeable and his military judgment is said to be splendid and sound. When defeat came, it was rarely said to be Lee’s fault but because others on his staff were to blame or because he was overwhelmed by forces beyond his control.