preview

Specific Heat Capacity Lab

Decent Essays

Purpose/ Research Question: Determine the specific heat capacity of two unknown metals. Find two Ionic compounds out of the several given chemicals that would synthesize in the product of the most effective hand warmer. Hypothesis: For both metals one and two, we can calculate the specific heat capacity within five percent error. The ideal hand warmer for cost, toxicity, and heat given off would include 5.0 g Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4) and 10 mL of deionized water. Procedures: We set up an appropriate apparatus including a Styrofoam calorimeter cup containing room temperature deionized water, two thermometers, and a clean beaker also containing deionized water directly on a heat source. After heating up the water until its boiling point, we recorded the mass of each metal and carefully placed the selected metal inside the boiling water until the temperature of the water containing the metal was constant. Quickly, we placed the hot metal from the boiling water in the calorimeter cup containing room temperature water …show more content…

We calculated the specific heat of metal one to be 0.39 J/g℃ which correlates to the exact specific heat capacity of element 30 Zinc. For metal two, we calculated the specific heat capacity to be 0.38 J/g℃ which was close to the actual specific heat of element 23 Iron. The specific heat capacity of Iron was 0.45 J/g℃. Our inaccuracy could be a result of not reading the thermometer as accurately as we could have. To improve yield in the future, we could make sure we record more accurate temperatures. I also accept my hypothesis on the most effective hand warmer. In terms of heat given off, toxicity, and price, Magnesium Sulfate was indeed the best choice for a hand warmer because when compared to the other given chemicals, it was the most exothermic in water, it is relatively nontoxic, and is very

Get Access