The Apology by Plato “Is the unexamined life worth living?” (The Apology, 2016, para. 48). This question has been asked by people since the time of Socrates. Many people delve into the quandary of this question seeking a greater understanding of their purpose. Often times, people live on the surface and never truly strive for self-examination, whereas others believe it is crucial to deeply examine one’s true self. Every life is worth living. However, the difference between simply existing in an unexamined life versus living life as God intended is momentous. An examined life is lived for the benefit of others more than oneself. Socrates’ question has revealed several different truths, including the value of self-examination, the importance …show more content…
Every life given by God is worth living. However, a self-examined life may well be one full of meaning, depth, and humility. It is vital to delve into life by being inquisitive and reflective rather than floating on the surface of existence. Being a leader means providing the followers with guidance and wisdom. In the apology, Socrates was continually proving respected politicians, poets, and even craftsmen to be fools. Every man he spoke with only had knowledge of a certain field of study or basic information, but there was no depth to their knowledge. The people did not have any substantial and meaningful knowledge beyond their specific field of expertise. The politicians, poets, and craftsmen all truly believed they themselves were wiser than Socrates and none were humble. Continually, Socrates proved these men to be hypocrites, which angered them. Being a good leader and living a substantial and meaningful life means that whether you are a leader or a follower, delving into knowledge is beneficial for the greater good. Additionally, having humility while in a roll of leadership will result in a more significant life in that position, whether one is a respected politician, poet, or craftsmen. If a leader has knowledge of only how to do his job, he cannot provide the best leadership to his followers because he will not be able to give substantial answers that will benefit them and
Philosophy is defined as the ultimate quest to help humans seek answers to questions that orbit knowledge, reality and existence. Philosophers begin their study of knowledge by asking questions they may or may not have an answer to. One famous philosopher, Socrates, utilizes this process to question his understanding on the concepts he had already attained knowledge for. At one point during his life, Socrates is proclaimed to be the wisest man alive by the Oracle of Delphi. Upon being declared the wisest man alive, Socrates begins to question everything he thought he knew.
The significance of Plato explaining what confusion, mistakes, and ignorance is teaching Alcibiades that if he wants to be a leader of the city then he must know what justice is, and not to be ignorant and make mistakes that could hinder people. If Alcibiades admits he does not know something or knows that he doesn’t and does not pretend to these things will not happen (Plato 26). In reference to Socrates wisdom he claims in the Apology he says he admits he does not know something and never pretending that he knows something when he actually doesn’t (Palto 25, Apology). Hence, the significance is Alcibiades learning that from Socrates that he is ignorant because he wants to make
In these, he tested to see how wise so-called wise men were and each and every time he claimed that these men were not wise at all. Socrates went and tested all sorts of men from poets, politicians, and artisans. He claimed that all were inferior to him because they claimed to know much when they knew not much at all. And that, although he did not know all the tings these men knew, he was still wiser. He went so far as to tell these men what he thought, and even stated all these feelings in the court. This, no doubt, led to his general hatred more than any other act. But I wonder, had anyone ever questioned Socrates? And on what basis did he judge wisdom? Socrates claimed that a man who thought themselves the wisest were the least, but that is exactly what he was, a man who thought himself the wisest. Maybe he was the type of person to dislike any man who’s intellect challenged his own. “Is there not here conceit of knowledge, which is a disgraceful sort of ignorance? And this is the point in which, as I think, I am superior to men in general.”
Plato’s Apology, is by far one of the most logical yet critical thinking text that I have ever read. Plato describes Socrates, the accused atheist and corrupter of youth in ancient Athens, as a true beacon of ethics and morality. The method that Plato uses to depict Socrates on trial gives us a look back on how the trial of a man who encourages one of sound mind to ask questions even to those who are deemed wise in the eyes of others. Despite facing odds that are stacked highly against him, and this being his first time in court “For I am more than seventy years of age, and this is the first time that I have ever appeared in a court of law, and I am quite a stranger to the ways of the place; and therefore I would have you regard me as if I
The Apology and Phaedo by Plato are two different books describing what is like to be a philosopher per Socrates believes. These two books take place in two different scenarios in Socrates’ life, The Apology takes place in a court room where Socrates is to defend himself from false charges brought to him by Meletus who is acting as the prosecutor. Phaedo, on the other hand, takes place in a prison cell post judgment on the day of Socrates execution. Hence, The Apology and Phaedo appeared to display different philosophies: The Apology, Plato presented Socrates as wise for he knows that he knows nothing, hence he is seeking wisdom by questioning those who think they know more or something, just to find that they don’t know anything, therefore Socrates makes it his duty to make them look ignorant/stupid. Phaedo, Socrates focuses primarily on death and the immortality of the soul, hence he is seeking knowledge by devoting his final hours picking the minds of his friends to explain the role of a philosopher, which is preparing for death. Consequently, these two views are really the same, yet presented differently by Socrates, for in one he is defending his freedom and life using philosophy, hence he has only done what the Gods expected of him. From the other view, he resigned to his fate, for as a philosopher, he knows his soul will finally become liberated from the evils and limitations of the body to come to its divine state.
Plato’s Apology is the story of the trial of Socrates, the charges brought against him and his maintaining of his own innocence throughout the process. At the onset of the trial, Socrates appears to challenging the charges, which included corrupting the youth, challenging belief in the gods that were accepted and reveled by the State, and introducing a new religious focus, but also belittles his own significance and suggesting that he will not attempt to disprove that he participated in the actions maintained by the court. In essence, Socrates appears almost self-effacing, and his defense surprises even his accuser, Meletus. But by the end of the Apology, Socrates becomes almost a different person,
In this reading Plato tells the story of Socrates and his trial which ultimately lead to his death sentence. Socrates was a 70 year old man at peace with his own mortality yet willing to face his accusers with an almost definite possibility of death to maintain his own integrity and beliefs and morality. He fully understood from the beginning of his trial what the sentence handed down would be yet on a level of honor and courage not seen in abundance in modern society he maintained his stance and delivered a compelling and convincing argument. He openly stated that he knew his actions had offended Meletus and
Socrates was a very simple man who did not have many material possessions and spoke in a plain, conversational manner. Acknowledging his own ignorance, he engaged in conversations with people claiming to be experts, usually in ethical matters. By asking simple questions, Socrates gradually revealed that these people were in fact very confused and did not actually know anything about the matters about which they claimed to be an expert. Socrates felt that the quest for wisdom and the instruction of others through dialogue and inquiry were the highest aims in life. He felt that "The unexamined life is not worth living." Plato's Apology is the speech Socrates made at his trial. Socrates was charged with not recognizing the
Students in colleges all around the world study early Greek stories and epics because they are the foundation for Western thought. The United States would not be the way it is today without Homer, and several other Greek and Roman authors. One such poet is Plato. Plato’s works are not nationally recognized as works of literary importance, because the literature is philosophical. Although Plato’s Apology is not considered to have literary merit, colleges teach using Plato and Socrates’ ideas found in Plato’s Apology. Why is that? Plato’s Apology is important to society because it teaches the reader that it is alright to be a rebel and challenge the common way of thinking.
1. In “Apology,” Socrates compares himself to a gadfly. Why is it that Socrates does this?
After reading the excerpt from the book, I found neither side of the argument to be particularly strong, though Socrates does tend to favor side B. The passage begins with Socrates explaining the difference in the opinions one may have on the subject of death. Side A, he defines, is when a person dies he or she enters a sort of sleep-like state. A powerful, yet peaceful, dreamless state. The person has no perception of the outside world and feels absolutely nothing for the rest of eternity. The argument for side B however, contains the idea that the departed persons soul is transferred from its home in the body to another place, perhaps heaven or another location. It is as if the soul lives on, continuing what it had begun in life.
Socrates lived most of his life constantly examining his own ideas and character. He saw such self-examination, whether conducted by himself or conversation with partners, to be the greatest good of a life worth living. Socrates' focus was to determine how to become a better human being. In this Socratic perspective, the quality and persistence of the attention we pay to living an examined life is at the heart of living well. Examining anything will result in understanding it. As for that Socrates quote "The unexamined life is not worth living". To me, that means to understand what you are living for is more important than actually living. Understanding yourself, your choices, and why you make those choices; Understanding others that influence you or are influenced by you. Truly understanding what you're doing in your lives endeavors are all things that would make your life "examined". Living an unexamined life would consist of never asking questions to help obtain knowledge to be intelligent instead of being completely ignorant to the world around you. However in this current society, knowledge seeking students are fed ideas and frameworks of interpretations, and attitudes about life and subjects
The Apology Written By Plato, is a detailed account of the trial of Socrates, who was a great philosopher in Athens. Socrates was brought to trial based on charges of “corrupting the youth” and “not believing in the gods” (23d). The people of Athens believed Socrates was corrupting the youth because they simply did not understand his method of inquiry, which consisted of Socrates teaching them to question what they thought to be true. Socrates’ method of inquiry drove his listeners to question their beliefs and often brought them to a state of puzzlement, or a state Plato calls ‘aporia.’ There are many examples of the Socratic method present in The Meno, which is also written by Plato. The entirety of The Apology consists of Socrates
What classifies humans as being the most intellectual above all other animals? Perhaps it is our ability to marvel and contemplate about the unknown wonders of life. In Plato’s The Apology, Socrates states that the unexamined life is not worth living. Socrates, being one of the original fathers of philosophy, firmly believed that the humans were solely created to inquire. If we were incapable of possessing curiosity, then we would be no different than other animals. Socrates’s profound statement relays that personal responsibilities cloud the need to examine daily life, a lack of knowledge may lead to certain demises, and refusal of finding purpose ultimately stunts philosophical growth.
Socrates, a Greek philosopher, once said that “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Apology 38b). Like Socrates, Albert Camus believed that a man needs to live meaningfully.