The Australian Dream Speech Analysis

Martin Luther King Jr., an American Baptist minister and a Civil Rights activist, became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the Civil Rights Movement. He is widely known for his speech that took place on 28 August 1963, “I Have a Dream.” This speech aimed toward the entire nation. King’s main purpose in this speech was to convince his audience to demand racial justice and for them all to stand up together for their rights. In this speech, King uses emotional and logical appeal to gain the audience's support. He applied many rhetorical devices to his speech to connect with the audience’s emotions, and to logically support his arguments.

One hundred years after the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation to stop slavery, Martin Luther King, Jr. presented the “I Have a Dream” speech to thousands of people. The day Luther King, Jr.’s speech was the day of the March on Washington, which was for the support of the rights o colored citizens, and for the termination of segregation. King delivered this speech with a tone of hope and determination in order to convince colored people to fight for their rights and persuade the citizens that all lives matter and should be treated equally. He also delivered it in order to urge the rights these people deserved. Luther stood before all these people to express his thoughts on equality and the rights his people were stripped of. Kings’ audience consisted of the citizens of America that believed in equality for all races. In the “I Have a Dream” Speech, Martin Luther King, Jr used many metaphors, similes, analogies, Pathos, and Mythos to connect with his audience on a superior level and develop his tone.

Stan Grant, ‘The Australian Dream’ has a more effective illustration of the perception of all Indigenous Australians, that Indigenous people should not be segregated from society due to racism. Grant’s version of the reality is that racism is still continuous despite the perception of multiculturalism and therefore places great emphasis on Australia’s racism towards certain groups and questioning the Australian ideal. This is evident in the lines “But every time we are lured into the light, we are mugged by the darkness of this country’s history.” Through the utilisation of metaphor and juxtaposition, Grant is able to make a strong emphasis that, Australia had tried to erase racism, such as through the apologies and reconciliation made by the people, but are then blinded by the past targeting of Aboriginal people who continue to be disadvantaged in the community today. Through this Grant has effectively stated that the nation covers the truth by providing hope to those most vulnerable but in fact the perception of a multicultural country still contains racism. Furthermore, Grant successfully expresses the fact that the nation overs the truth of racism, through the National Anthem in attempt to erase racism. However no matter what strategies are implemented to hide the truth, the country’s history will always be a reminder of the racism as it has shaped the nation as it is today. “It reminds me that my people, were killed on those plains. We were

(topic SENTENCE). Stan Grant is a 52-year-old Indigenous-Australian activist, journalist and author from Griffith, New South Wales. Grant over the past three decades of his career has worked with the ABC, SBS, CNN, and Seven Networks and currently hosts Reporting Live with Stan Grant on Sky News and The Point with Stan Grant on NITV. Furthermore, Grant was recently selected to be part of a bipartisan referendum council that aims towards indigenous recognition in the constitution. (LINK) Stan’s speech was made on the 27th of October 2015 as part of an IQ2 debate series hosted by the Ethics Centre on whether racism is destroying the Australian dream, however the video of the speech was only published online on 21st January 2016. After it was posted online the speech was rediscovered and went viral on social media obviously resounding with Australians in the lead up to Australia day. In Declaring “The Australian Dream is rooted in Racism” Stan Grant’s speech continues the long ongoing discussion of indigenous inequality and health issues resulting from racism in our country. Although racism towards

Stan Grant refers to the British people treating the Indigenous like they were sub-humans. Grant used the phrase ‘The Australian Dream’ throughout his speech. This signifies the irony which exists within this ‘Dream’. In this speech ‘The Australian Dream’ was linked to the ‘rooted racism’ which existed within our society. This sense of negativity and differentiation between the two races is further accentuated through the use of alliteration in ‘rooted racism’. Grant communicated in his speech that ‘The Australian Dream’ was about white people owning a house and not giving the rights to Indigenous to do the equivalent. Grant talks about the British saying the Indigenous weren’t in Australia before they arrived, hence why the Indigenous rights were extinguished. Additionally, the differentiation between the British and the Indigenous people was further explored through Grant saying; “British people looked at us, they saw something sub-human, and if we were human at all, we occupied the lowest rung on civilisation’s ladder. We were fly-blown, Stone Age savages and that was the language that was used”. Grant uses words and phrases such as sub-human, humans at all, lowest rung, fly-blown and Stone Age savages to show the audience the treatment which the Indigenous people were receiving from the British population. This is further emphasized through the use of commoratio by repeating the same thing put in different phrases. Grant uses

‘The Australian Dream’ spoken by Stan Grant, has presented his perception on the issue of racism amongst Indigenous Australians, in which their struggles have been covered by the media to enhance Australia’s image of being a multicultural country. Despite Australia being infamous for its idea of a multicultural country, Stan Grant opposes against this and reveals the truth that racism is still continuous. Therefore, proving Stan Grant point that racism allows for the emotional and physical struggle on one’s lives. “But every time we are lured into the light, we are mugged by the darkness of this country’s history.” Through the utilisation of metaphor and juxtaposition, Grant is able to make a strong emphasis that, Australia had tried to erase racism, such as through the apologies and reconciliation made by the people, but are then blinded by the past targeting of Aboriginal people who continue to be

There are many diverse interpretations of the words “Australian Identity”. The national anthem, as evidenced in Stand Up, is a primarily white interpretation of Australia and the Australian identity, with many of the lines ignoring the Indigenous people of Australia (Perkins et al, 2012). Another form of the “Australian Identity” was one presented by Prime Minister Paul Keating in his Redfern Address in 1992. He proclaimed that “Australia is a first-rate social democracy…truly the land of the fair go and the better chance”. This idea presented represents an egalitarian society, where every single human has an equal opportunity at life. Yet another, shown in the songs Paul Kelly sang, but especially in “this land is mine” is the difference between the identity of Indigenous Australians and non-Indigenous Australians (Kelly et al, 2001). Each of these texts addressed a major issue. Stand Up compared the relative value of tradition and the right to freedom of expression. Keating’s speech expressed the need for justice and recognition of both the stolen generation and the injustices done to the Indigenous people as a whole. Kelly’s songs represent the importance of the land to Indigenous people and why the “returning of the land” is so important. Although they each mentioned a major issue, the texts all gave solutions to these issues, from reiterating the importance of the basic human right of freedom of speech in Stand Up, to explaining the role and qualities of the Aboriginal

The Speech by Stan Grant uses repetition to challenge previously held opinions of the audience, leading them to make discoveries about the racist nature of the Australian Dream. The repetition of “the Australian Dream” leads the audience to think deeply about what it is that this entails and whether we should consider it a positive phrase or one backed by racism and

By repeatedly turning the conversation back on the audience, saying “go to the Sydney Gazette and look it up and read about it” Grant makes them a part of the argument and makes them accountable for their role in the solution to the racism I Australia. Doing this makes it possible for the receiver to feel obligated to learn more about the subject matter at hand and, even after the speeches completion, discover a new perspective on the content. Grant uses the emotive language of “two centuries of dispossession, injustice, suffering” the convey the circumstances faced by him and his ancestors that have beaten them down as a people. This juxtaposes, however, against the use of “survival”, showing how, despite the injustice and suffering, they continue to survive and not give up on their home. This is an example of a long-term discovery that the Aboriginal community can survive whatever it is being thrown at them and is still be rediscovered everyday as they continue to survive in the face of the ‘Australian Dream’. Pauses are used strategically throughout the speech to allow the audience time to process what has been said and allow them to draw discoveries from the information provided for them. By pausing after making the bold statement “We’re better than this” Grant is allowing the affirmation to sink in that it is possible that not all non-indigenous Australians are racist and that change is possible. Discoveries that occur over a period of time can often be more meaningful than the realisations that happen in an instant as they have been considered deeper and can be the most vital discoveries to initiate

In the "Australian Dream" debate Grant is composed, despite the use of personal anecdotes, his words are smooth and flow easily creating an engaging speech. Grant's voice is kept respectful, calling for action without demanding it. Passion can still be heard in his voice, passion for his people and for his cause, but he does not let this take over. It is also clear that what he is discussing, the injustice that has been thrust upon the Aboriginal people, specifically that of his relatives, does cause him pain but it is shrouded. There is no urgency to this speech, while it is still important. This debate was not planned because of a source of outrage, simply a debate to make arguments known, it is due to this that Grant has kept himself composed throughout the

Grant discusses this by analysing Australia nationalist identity and it's propagandizing to it's citizens. One of the most poignant moments in Grants speech is his de-construction of the Australian National

The, “I Have a Dream” speech given by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is arguably the most emotionally moving and persuasive speech of all time. But, to understand the speech one must first understand the context. At this time, the slave era was far gone but, not forgotten. Negro men and women were still experiencing segregation in the 1960’s. There was negro bathrooms, negro schools, negro water fountains, and even negro restaurants. Martin Luther King Jr. was an influential black man who took on the fight for equality. King presents his speech to a crowded Lincoln memorial — the same Lincoln who delivered the Emancipation Proclamation which freed enslaved Negros in the south nearly a hundred years before. King’s speech, later known as the, “I

“I have a dream that one day all men are created equal.” Arguably the most powerful quote said by the most powerful men at the most powerful of speeches known as the “I Have a Dream Speech” during the African American Civil Rights Movement. So, it does require deep analyzation to fully grasp the piece and the author as whole. Analyzing the style of the author as a writer and a speaker, the audience and the rhetorical themes will help you to fully grasp the piece and the author. The author his name, Martin Luther King. Martin Luther King is an astonishing speaker. He is also a great writer too. Martin Luther King’s speech changed the landscape of civil rights immediately and for years to come. Since there is the speech itself and a written piece I will be analyzing a mix of both from the speech and the written peace.

I am writing this letter to you in hopes of gaining insight on how to handle the grave issues of racism and injustice that appear to be a curse upon our great country, the United States of America. Back then, you used your cogent words to penetrate into the minds of all those listening in hopes of uniting our nation, and erasing racial barriers along the way. You fought for peace and freedom using non-violence and preached equality to the people of this country. From your involvement in the first major civil rights movement to multiple peaceful campaigns to your march on Washington and most importantly to your "I Have A Dream" speech, America looks up to you until this day with respect and gratitude for what you did and how you brought

Picture yourself living in a society where people are judged and hated upon because of the pigment of their skin, terrible right? Enslaved, criticized, and alienated because there were “different” from everyone else. Even when granted freedom, colored men and women were still treated as if they were peasants to America. Martin Luther King Jr’s speech had the power to motivate this broken society to end their racist ways. After being lied to for many of years about being “free”, King decided that during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, he would put an end to it all. After hundred of years of being hurt by the “manacles of segregation and the chains of determination”(“ American Rhetoric: Martin Luther King I