The Cask of Amontillado The Electoral College system is a serious problem with the United States government. The Electoral College is a system for election in which each state selects electors equal in number to that of its representation in the House and Senate. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) This method took the election of the president and vice-president out of the people and Congress's hands, and placed it in that of the selected electors. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) Forty-eight of the fifty states use the "winner-take-all" method. (Lavelle et al., 2000) That means that whichever candidate wins the states popular vote receives all of that state's electoral votes. (Lavelle et al., 2000) The system was the result of a compromise …show more content…
(O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) So the Framers decided that Presidents wouldn't be popularly elected. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) Instead, a group of electors equal in number to that of the state's number of representatives in the House and Senate would be designated by appointment or by popular vote. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) Whichever candidate received a majority of the electors won the presidency. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) This means there are a total of 538 electoral votes up for grabs, and 270 of those votes are needed to win the majority. (Rosenberg, 2000) In the case that no candidate reaches 270 votes, the House would select a president and the Senate would choose the vice president. (Rosenberg, 2000) This particular situation occurred in 1800 when Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr both received 73 electoral votes. (Rosenberg, 2000) The House eventually gave the victory to Thomas Jefferson.(Rosenberg, 2000) Then in 1824, 1876, and 1888 a candidate lost the popular vote, but still won the presidency. (Rosenberg, 2000) Since our nation has entered the 20th century, there have still been several crises in which the Electoral College is to blame. In the election of 1976, Democrat Jimmy Carter received 1.7 million more votes than the
Thematically very different, “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe and “A&P” by John Updike are both tales told through the eyes of one main character and one has to be conscious of how truthful and reliable those characters words are. However, while both stories are told in the first person, the reliability of both Montresor and Sammy differ greatly.
Another problem surrounding the Electoral College system is that it allows one-party states, states that almost always go to one party. In this context, a Democrat who casts a vote in a mostly Republican state feels that his vote is wasted because of no way that state will be won by a Democrat. Besides, the system is based on two-party elections, the Democrat and the Republican leaving Americans with two candidates to choose (Belenky, 364). The voters end up picking the candidate with fewer issues rather than the one they support. In my opinion, people feel that Electoral College has single-handedly defeated
The electoral college has a major corruption through the fact that each vote is represented by a different percentage of a state’s population. Wyoming has one vote for every 187,875 citizens, while California has one vote for every 677, 345 citizens.(Document 2). This turns away any constant in the amount of voters
It was a cold October night when I first heard of Fortunato’s case, I was very amused at the thought of someone doing something so unhuman to a person. I guess some people can’t control their actions, but then again those people belong in a mental institution. This case in particular was very peculiar because it had gone five years without being solved. It was about a week ago when our department heard about this case, it wasn’t long before the case landed on my hands. I am after all the best detective in this state something to be proud of course. Going out to the other side of the world to solve a case was something I had never done before but this case was overdue and someone had to do
The voting process in America appears straightforward, but it is a very complex, complicated system. The Electoral College is America’s current voting system. The Electoral College still serves its intended purpose, but with increasing political activity among Americans it has caused a need to reform this process. Research suggests that the Electoral College system should be amended because it poorly illustrates democracy, is outdated and the majority of Americans are in favor of abolishing the system.
The Electoral College system was created in the constitution by the Founding Fathers. This system forms the beginning of the United States' national elections and is therefore, considered to be important to this country's history. It is made up of 538 members and a candidate must receive a majority of 270 electoral votes to win the election. Electors usually get selected to one of the presidential candidates running. When people go to the ballot on voting day and pick their favorite candidate, they are really choosing the electors for their state and then the electors are the ones that vote for the president. The Electoral College should be revised or abolished because it is both undemocratic, is not beneficial to the nation, and may weaken the validity of elections and the elected President.
In order to fully understand the underlying problems of the Electoral College we have to look back at the time that the idea of the Electoral College itself was proposed and see how the culture of the time and the ideologies of the people involved helped shaped the final outcome. Life today is much different than it was two hundred odd something years ago, and it’s fair to say that the political ideals and social norms around our society have changed drastically.
The problem that has brought the Electoral College to the spotlight in the past few years is the fact that the Electoral College winner does not always reflect the winner of the popular vote. This has already occurred three times in history: Rutherford B. Hays vs. Samuel J. Tilden in 1876, Benjamin Harrison vs. Grover Cleveland in 1888 and most recently, the 2000 election between Gore and Bush (Cornwell). Although half a million more Americans voted for Al Gore than did for George Bush, Bush won the Electoral College 271 to 266, granting him the presidency (Abolish the Electoral College). It doesn't make much sense that the candidate in which received a majority of the votes overall would lose.
538 is the sum of the nation’s 435 Representatives, 100 Senators, and 3 electors given to the District of Columbia.
The Constitution of the United States of America created a system called the Electoral College where it outlines the rules in which we elect the President of the United States of America. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution created the Electoral College. Each state receives as many electoral votes as it has senators and representatives. Therefore, each state, including the District of Columbia, will have at least three electors. This is the vision of the Constitution. Now the problem arises when all the Electoral votes from one state are given to the popular winner for that state. This causes a with people’s right to chose their leader as votes of the people that voted for the losing candidate are tossed in the trash. All this while giving the state the ultimate power to elect the president.
The United States, well known for its democracy, holds elections every four years to elect its President. Every American citizen over the age of 18 has a right to cast a vote in the presidential election. The voting process, although it seems easy and straightforward, can be very complicated. In the 2000 election, Al Gore captured the majority of votes, but George Bush won. The reason for this strange outcome and why Al Gore lost was because of the Electoral College. The Electoral College is voting system where different states are given a certain amount of votes in the election, and which ever candidate wins a state, is given that state’s votes. The Electoral College is out of date, and should be replaced by the Popular Vote system,
"I must not only punish, but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong." With these ferverous words from the introductory paragraph of Edgar Allan Poe's Cask of Amontillado, the story of Montresor's revenge begins. Poe repeatedly stresses the need for revenge due to bitterness and resentment in Montresor's character towards Fortunato, but more importantly, stress is placed on revenge by which the victim realizes their injustice towards the redresser. Unfortunately, it seems that Montresor is denied this pure and encompassing revenge when his victim,
In the short story “The Cask of Amontillado,” the conniving Montresor is overwhelmed by his friend Fortunato’s constant gossip at his expense. Feeling betrayed by his apparent friend, Montresor plans to seek his revenge on Fortunato. Knowing all of Fortunato’s greatest weaknesses, he devises a plot to restore honor to his slandered name. Montresor succeeds in his scheme, entombing his former friend within the walls of his wine cellar. The planning and fulfillment of Montresor’s revenge demonstrates qualities such as vengefulness, cunningness and sadism.
Edgar Allan Poe wrote the Cask of Amontillado using many terms and hidden statements that added to the suspense of this revenge story. He writes of two characters using a precise word choice that allows the reader to gain more of a sense of what is going on and understand the plot of the story better.
In a famous tale written by Edgar Allen Poe known as “The Cask of Amontillado” the main character, Montresor, lured his old friend, Fortunato, deep into the depths of a catacomb and proceeded to murder him as revenge. Many mysterious and horrible things have occurred in catacombs everywhere. Explorers find more and more reasons everyday to travel through various nightmare-filled quarries in an attempt to uncover the history hidden under the surface of Paris, Rome, and other locations spread around the world. These underground cemeteries have a more gruesome history than what you might believe, not as surprising as murder, but it still is quite intriguing.