The Crusades Dbq

The Crusades were more negative rather beneficial because of the religious hatred that they left behind and that they turned onto jews. Document one states,”...massacring entire communities,” meaning many people died because of the bitter legacy of the hatred of the religious.This is important because religious hatred is a legacy that was left by the crusades when they also failed in their chief

The crusades were more negative than positive because there were many innocent people were killed because of their religion. In document 1 it states In Europe, crusaders sometimes turned their fury against jews, massacring entire communities. They would do this just because they were

One negative result of the Crusades was the bitter relationship between the Christians and the Muslims. Document 5 states that “...the example of persecution set by Christian kings and prelates (bishops) left an inheritance of deep bitterness” (unknown source Document 5). This is important because the religious persecution between

The crusade had a negative effect on both the christians and the muslims. The negative impact it had was it killed innocent jews who were not a part of the crusade they would kill them because they were mad and did not trust any religion but their own.

The Crusades brought back many ideas to the western upon arrival. They brought back spices, sugars, and silk, which they later adopted and are used in the western states today. In the DBQ packet, it states, “When the Crusaders returned to Europe, they brought back things such as spices, sugars, and silk.” This quote shows a positive impact on the Western world. One negative impact that impacted the Western world was that rather than reuniting the Greek and Latin churches, the Crusades only caused them to be further apart. The text states, “When one of the goals of the Fourth Crusade was reunion of Greek and Latin Churches, made the split between Greek and Latin churches permanent.” This quote shows a negative impact that the Crusades had on the western world. Even though the western world had to face these things, the Eastern world had to face many things as

The crusades were multiple religious wars between the muslims and the christians. The wars were very violent and they also destroyed and ruined many things. Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative.The crusades fought violent, bloody wars that were against that christians and the muslims. Document 1 states that the crusades were bitter because of the hatred to certain religions .This is (important) because the main part of the crusades was that they all started to take back jerusalem and they were also very racist. Document 7 states that crusade kingdoms were hard to manage because the crusading knights would abuse and commit other atrocities on other christians.This is relevant because they were hard to maintain because

In the transition of the mediaeval times, one of the most important thing that occurred were the Crusades. Crusades that have a debatable point of view according to the influences that such created in the western world. Many historians think that the Crusades had a positive influence in Europe, but others do not agree with this idea. The Crusades started because of the Byzantine emperor who asked for help against the Seljuk Turks, who were Muslims. From there is the first negative consequence, and was that time after the same Crusades sacked the Byzantine empire because was the greatest commercial competitor. Furthermore, there are evidences which ones imply that

In the eleventh century and into the thirteenth century a management of a series of nine wars came to know as the crusades.They both have a positive and negative impact on the eastern not only eastern but western too.Were the result of the crusades more positive or negative?The result of the crusades more negative considering that they would turn their fury against Jews and murder their entire communities.Their goal was also to separate the churches permanently.They wouldn’t have tolerance for people facing the wrong way while praying in mosque.It was also hard for to maintain crusaders kingdoms.

The Crusades were a fight for the Holy Land between Christians , Muslims and Jews. The Crusade left a very negative legacy because of the hatred and how they left all the land. The result of the Crusade came out more negative because how much land and historical things were destroyed. Document 4 states that a library and relics were destroyed in Constantinople.

While for Christians it was important because Jesus had spent the majority of his life there. (io) These crusades showed the power of the church during medieval Europe. People went on these crusades because they believed that “God wills it.” (io) The effects that the Crusades had on Western Europe were both positive and negative.

The Crusades had 9 of battles and the Crusades still affect us to this day. Do you think that the Crusades were more positive or negative? They were more negative because only had battles and wars to take their land or to get back at them.

The Fourth crusade was a lot about money and excuses to kill. It was a turning point in history because it made the catholic church more known and it grew more wealthy. After the Crusades the monarchs began to grow more and started to end feudalism. . The most important effects was the increasing trade of Europe and Asia heir was also a banking system to transfer funds for troops and others. distress Of Europeans. From the Spanish shutting out the Muslims they started to weaken. The Crusades where important in history and where gruesome but where important for many ideas in history. The fourth crusade was brutal for money.

The crusades had a long crucial 9 wars from the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries between the Christian and Muslim religions. The question has been asked for decades wondering if the crusades were more positive or negative. You can’t say the crusades had more of a positive influence the negative because 9 wars is a definite negative. Sentries later, an estimate has been made by historians and their approximation is that about 1.7 million people died in the 200 years including innocent people. The crusades are more negative because of the hatred between religions and the many that died in the long wars.

The crusaders were more positive because the transportation and the trade routes improved throughout Europe. Document 4 states that, the negative impact of the 2 lands,

From the eleventh and through the thirteenth century there was nine wars fought between two religions. These wars are known as the Crusades. So, where the results of the Crusades more positive or negative? I think that the results were more negative because they failed in their conquest of the Holy Land. I also think that the results were more negative because both religious groups committed atrocities in the name of their religion and after the Crusades most people don’t have religious tolerance.