The Internal Revenue Service ( Irs )

Now the following information is well documented and is presented for your review and edification. Do not try to fight the IRS in federal court, you will not win. The deception runs rampant throughout the executive, legislative and judicial branches.

Article I Section Eight of the U.S. Constitution provides that the Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the Debts and provide

Article I Section 8 Clause 18 states that Congress has the power “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof”. An example of the use of this clause is Congress legislating punishment for not paying taxes. Article I gives Congress the right to tax and this example shows Congress protecting that right which is the purpose of the necessary

The IRS has a long history of enforcing various form of taxes and a variety of regulation in the United States of America. In fact, federal agencies such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms began as part of the IRS before separation onto its own agency. Below is a brief timeline of the origins of the IRS and subsequent events that transformed it into the agency it is today:

“When it came to levying taxes the Articles stated Congress could request states to pay taxes. The Constitution states Congress has the right to levy taxes on individuals” (Feldmeth, Greg D. "U.S. History Resources" http://home.earthlink.net/~gfeldmeth/USHistory.html (31 March 1998). “A federal court the Articles

In addition, the federal government should fulfill its obligation in return of citizen’s taxation. Article. I. Section. 8 specifically enumerates the power belonged to the congress, which refers to the federal

The first proposal to impose an income tax on Americans occurred during the War of 1812. After two years of war, the federal government had accumulated a whopping $100 million of debt. To fund the war against Britain, the government doubled the rates of its major source of revenue, customs duties on imports, which obstructed trade and ended up yielding less revenue than the previous lower rates. At the height of the war, excise taxes were imposed on goods and commodities, housing, slaves and land were taxed. Finally when the war ended in 1816, these taxes were abolished. A high tariff was then passed to retire the accumulated war debt. Thankfully, the notion of an income tax was conquered (Young, 2004). However, the thought of the income tax reappeared as an idea to fund the Union armies in the war to prevent the secession of the Confederacy. The war was expensive, costing on average $1,750,000 a day. Struggling to meet these expenses, the Republican Congress borrowed heavily, doubled tariff rates, sold off public lands, imposed a maze of licensing fees, increased old excise tax rates and created new excise taxes. But none of this was enough to fund the debt (Young, 2004)..

The tax policy in the United States is very confusing. When the tax policy was originally written in 1913 it was four hundred pages. Now, over the past ninety one years, that tax policy has evolved to over 72,000 pages. Since the tax code has become so lengthy and nearly impossible to understand, the topic of tax reform has been in the minds of many. Although, most barely think about tax reform until tax season. It is a controversial subject due to the impact a change in tax code would have on the American people. The two most popular and widely known stakeholders in this debate are the two major political parties in the United States, the Democrats and the Republicans. The two parties share absolutely no common ground on the subject of

Along with the rising threats of larger militaries spawning in the world, it became apparent we needed more funding for our own. Along with the rapid development of America came more demands for the government to pay for. Although, how the money is collected is confusing, and how it is spent becomes wasteful at times. The IRS is one of the most confusing systems to understand for not only citizens, but the people who operate and work for it. Alongside with how the money is never saved and meant to be spent when given to government agencies, doesn’t respect the taxpayer. I find it necessary, although how it is practiced boots it down the list.

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency is the largest and pri- mary investigative arm of the U.S. DHS.46 ICE is responsible for identifying and inves- tigating weaknesses within the nation’s borders, developing intelligence concerning threats, removing foreign nationals, and enforcing over 400 federal statutes. The agency was formed in 2003 as part of the Homeland Security Act and is the result of a merger of several federal agencies, including the Customs Service, Immigration and Natural- ization, and the Federal Protective Service. ICE has approximately 15,000 employees in 400 offices in the United States and 50 offices around the world.47 The ICE agency plays a pivotal role in enforcing Internet-related crimes because

In the United States today there are millions of corporations in many different industries. All of them must abide by the current taxation rules and regulations that have been set by IRS and congress. The Internal Revenue Code, which was originally founded in 1939, set the foundation for the codification that we have in place today. The code arranged all Federal Tax provisions in a logical order and placed them in a separate part of the federal status. Over the years, congress has updated and amended the tax code in 1954, in 1986 Tax Reform Act, and is constantly updating the code due to its importance in assessing judicial and administrative decisions. The

The 501(c)3 tax code specifically for organizations that are reserved for educational institutions, churches or other nonprofit organizations including what is often deemed as charitable (Lavarda, 2009). There are two main reasons that an organization will seek to attain a tax-exempt status with the federal government through the Internal Revenue Services (IRS). First, is to provide for their beneficiaries a tax-deductible contribution, which allows taxpayers benefits when paying their federal income taxes and secondly, simply is for organizations the ability to not pay federal income taxes (Lavarda, 2009; Arnsberger, Ludlum, Riley, & Statnton, 2008). Organizations who seek out the tax-exempt status do benefit from the protection that the tax code provides, however due to tax code regulations and reform, organizations that do not heed to the code may be in jeopardy of violating the code. This violation will result in the IRS revoking the tax-exempt status. For emerging organizations that are on the cusp of defining their affiliations in society must determine if applying for tax-exemption status is a profitable move. Due to the scrutiny of these organizations and such organizations must take into account the liability that comes with the tax exemption status. The liability is not one that an organization can take lightly, if an organization does gain tax-exemption status and then later fails to abide by the regulations, the risk is simple; the revocation of the

The 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”

Currently, the United States has a federal income tax that is very difficult to understand, to comply with,

The Stakeholders are individuals or groups, inside or outside of the organization, encouraging, directly or ramblingly of the success of the team (Palmer, Dunford, & Akin, 2009, p.146). Charles Rossotti took leadership at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in 1997 as commissioner to amid complaints of abuse of workers and taxpayers (Riccucci, Rainey, & Thompson, 2006, p.596). Rossotti supervised the establishments and the stakeholders of IRS. The primary stakeholders in the transformation of the IRS are the internal stakeholders meaning the employees such as the tax preparators. In additional the external stakeholders are the customers identified as the taxpayers. Rossotti’s determination was to show to the Congress that the employees and the