preview

'The Power Of Words In George Orwell's Animal Farm'

Decent Essays

Persuasiveness is a big factor when trying to get people to pick a side if they are torn about what to do. Having a persuasive quality can be very beneficial when it comes to a heated competition, or when wanting things to go a specific way. The author of “Animal Farm,” George Orwell, shows the use of persuasive characteristics within his novel. The Russian Revolution was a time period that consisted of an immense amount of competition between others, which brought out the persuasive side in people. Orwell develops a theme of “the power of words,” in his novel by using the characters Old Major and Squealer to show that persuasive words can be convincing enough to make someone do or believe something, especially if the topic is explained in …show more content…

Orwell used a type of persuasive writing called emotional appeal to make the animals feel bad for Old Major and follow in his footsteps. “…Before I die, I feel it is my duty to pass on to you such wisdom as I have acquired,” (Orwell 2). When “before I die,” and “pass on to you such wisdom” was said, it is clearly understood that Old Major is trying to dramatize his speech and convince the animals to follow in his belief, by using his life span against them. Old Major was trying to tell the animals that he was a very wise animal and that they should do as he says. To get the animals to agree with him, Orwell highlights Old Majors time left of living to make animals honor his idea. On the other hand, Orwell writes Old Majors speech with phrases within it that can make the animals reflect on how their lives are and how they are treated. “Our lives are miserable, laborious, and short,” (Orwell 2).This phrase here shows the readers that Old Major is trying to persuade …show more content…

Squealer persuaded the pigs to do as Squealer said by explaining what the farm would be like without them. “We pigs are brainworkers,” (Orwell 14). Many people during the Russian Revolution felt very motivated to do something when their ego was filled. When Squealer described the pigs as “brainworkers,” the pigs, and other animals, could be persuaded to believe what Squealer is saying and create motivation. To be in government, people expected everything to be about your brain and how smart you are, not who you are as a person; this is why the animals could be influenced to believe the pigs are the best. Compared to that statement, Squealer continues to feed the pigs egos by explaining the farm wouldn’t run without the pigs. “The whole management and organization of this farm depend on us,” (Orwell 14). By saying this, the animals were able to predict what life on the farm would be like without the pigs, all because of the way Squealer was trying to persuade them. This also made the pigs feel that they were the best of the best, and created a heated competition which created more persuasiveness within the story! As a result, Squealer continues to fill the pigs egos and have the other animals imagine what it would be like without the pigs, in his speech. “Do you know what would happen if we failed our duty?

Get Access