Essay on The Turing Test

Turing was one of the people who worked on the first computers. He was the first person to propose the idea of using a computer to do things that were too hard for a person to do, technically leading to the idea of industrial robots. He created the Turing machine in 1936. This machine was imaginary, but it included

The turing test proposed by Allan Turing(1950) , was designed to provide a satisfactory operational definition of intelligence. A computer passes the test if a human interrogator , after passing some written questions cannot tell whether the written responses came from a person or from a computer.

The Turing Test, created by Alan Turing, tests for intelligence in a systematic way, giving intelligence an operational meaning. Turing believed that humans could one day create an artificial intelligence (AI for short) — since his definition was liberal. The basic premise of the Turing Test is that

Alan Turing was a British philosopher who wrote the paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” that discusses about artificial intelligence and the Turing test. In the paper, Alan Turing believes that machines could think however it is complicated to determine if machines or programmed digital computers have that ability to think just like humans. “If the meaning of the words machine and think are to be found by examining how they are commonly used it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the meaning and the answer to the question” (Turing 1). According to Alan Turing, he questions if machines can have the ability to think. In order to determine that machines can think, he tested it by having a machine play the imitation game where a machine has to emulate the behavior of a human. In this game, the interrogator asks

Turing solved it, but in the process established a system that is still useable today.

The Turing machine test, which was first introduced by the philosopher Alan Turing, was held to find if machines possessed intelligence and the power to stimulate thinking like any other human being. The main argument of the game was that if machines could pass the Turing test then one could be sure of the fact that machines do have higher artificial intelligence and thinking. The Turing test, or also known as the imitation game, is a game designed based on three people in which one machine and a human is placed in one room and the interrogator is placed in another room. The test mainly begins with the machine and the other person, in the same room, answering questions asked by the interrogator. Based on the answers given, the interrogator

“The Turing test is, at bottom, about the act of communications” (Christian), writes Brian Christian in a 2011 issue of The Atlantic. He titled his article: “Man vs Machine.” First introduced by Alan Turing in 1957 as the “Imitation Game,” the Turing test has since grown in fame and controversy. However, the Turing test is not fundamentally about knocking humanity off its pedestal of intelligence; it is actually an observation about our human ability to communicate about intelligence to each other. While language is not sufficient proof of intelligence, communication is fundamental to how people acknowledge each other as intelligent beings.

We carried out this investigation to see what would happen and to see if it is easy enough to distinguish the difference between human and artificial intelligent conversations. A certain human was picked to complete the Turing, as he was the one capable of asking the questions. The importance of him asking the questions was because we needed a person to begin the conversation, and also to make sure that the investigation was fair. Here are the results:

Turing is well known for it's publication of Computing machinery and intelligence which includes it's test on whether or not computers could think. In order to prove computers intelligence, Turing elaborated a test which consisted on having two people having a conversation with another person and a machine without seeing them; they were expected to see if the humans could make difference between the computers and the real person. If the other person didn't notice, that would've consequently meant that the test had worked and that computers could think in a smart way. As said by the British Mathematician, he believed that computers could highly surprise humans.

Before the history of computers actually got started, the word ‘computer’ was being used around the 1700’s. It was defined as a human who was able to perform multiple calculations. The history of computers dates back to the 1820’s. A man by the name of Charles Babbage began developing a ‘Difference Engine’. The difference engine was a machine that was able to count multiple sets of numbers. In 1937 J.V. Atanasoff does an experiment in which he tries to create the first computer without gears, cams, belts or shafts. Four years later, Atanasoff, with the help of his graduate student Clifford Berry, they are able create a computer that is able to store and maintain information. This is the first digital computer.

If the questioner couldn’t tell the difference between the texts, the test would be passed, meaning the machine has intelligence. Even Though Caleb isn't doing the original Turing test, since he is viewing Ava’s actions, as she answers the questions. “For Turing, there is nothing more to being intelligent than being able to use language as we do(taken from Doing Philosophy, Lewis Vaughn).” This states that Ava is intelligent since it’s stated in the movie that she is born with language and demonstrates it throughout the sessions with Caleb. Although Ava can clearly pass the Turing test without a doubt, John Searle denies that it takes any intelligence to pass the Turing test. A thought experiment, called Searle’s Chinese Room, where a human is put in the computer's spot and given an input in Chinese with no knowledge of that language, just a rulebook which translates the symbols into english. The job of that person is to give an output that makes sense to the input given by using the rulebook. Like a computer or this case Ava, the human put to the test manipulated the symbols, but added no meaning to the symbol. According to Searle, “computers manipulate symbols on the basis of their physical features or form, whereas humans manipulate symbols on the basis of their meaning or content(taken from Doing Philosophy, Lewis

A good chess program, like my (as yet undefeated) Chessmaster 4000 Trubo refutes proposition three by passing a Turing test. It appears to be intelligent, but I know it beats me through number crunching and symbol manipulation.

In an article written in 1950 "Computing machinery and intelligence" Turing wondered if a machine could think. To find out, he proposed the “imitation game”. That is, the machine would imitate the language behavior of a human being and a judge would compare the writing behavior of a human to that of a machine by asking questions. Turing conjectures that within fifty years after the publication of the article, machines would become powerful enough to mislead the judge three or four times out of ten. Therefore, according to Turing, popular wisdom would then acknowledge that machines can think.

Alan Turing was a famous British mathematician and computer scientist who was determined to prove that machines at some point (possibly sometime in the future) would be able to surpass humans in intelligence levels. In order to prove this true, he created what became to be known as, “The Turing Test.” This test was basically to see if a computer could trick a person into believing that it was human. It would be asked a series of questions, which would be compared to responses of the human. It was designed so that one could judge the intelligence level of the computers’ responses. Turing believed that if a human could not tell the difference between another human and a computer, then it served as proof that a computer is equally intelligent as a human. Due to a large

There are many adversaries about this fact, that an excellent discussion on the Turing test is not supportive, with restrictions on the observer's knowledge of AI and the subject matter of questioning. It turns out that some people are easily misinterpreted that, a rather dumb program is intelligent. When we set out to design an AI program, we should attempt to specify as well as possible the criteria for success for that particular program functioning in its restricted domain.