preview

Things They Carried

Good Essays

Guests of the Nation and The Things They Carried Compared Guests of the Nation by Frank O’Connor and The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien have a lot in common, and also a lot that sets them apart from each other. They both focus on the theme of a soldier’s duty, and use point of view great effect. Whereas Guests of the Nation uses first person, the relevant portion of The Things They Carried uses third. In Guests of the Nation, O’Connor explores and develops the theme of duty more successfully than O’Brien does in The Things They Carried, but O’Brien uses point of view more effectively than O’Conner. The main theme in Guests of the Nation is duty. The entire story is centered on Bonaparte’s conflicting senses of duty. Bonaparte has a …show more content…

Guests of the Nation is written in the first person point of view. Because of this, we are limited to the experiences and perspective of the main character, Bonaparte. This has the effect of making the story feel more realistic, like it really happened to someone—like it could really happen to you. At the pivotal moment of the story, when Donovan shoots Hawkins, the power of the first person point of view is on full display: I alone of the crowd saw Donovan raise his Webley to the back of Hawkins's neck, and as he did so I shut my eyes and tried to say a prayer. Hawkins had begun to say something else when Donovan let fly, and, as I opened my eyes at the bang, I saw him stagger at the knees and lie out flat at Noble's feet, slowly, and as quiet as a child, with the lantern-light falling sadly upon his lean legs and bright farmer's boots. (O’Conner 57) We easily slip into the place of Bonaparte, standing in a cold wet bog, his stomach turning with horror and disbelief, as he watches Hawkins stagger and fall. The first person point of view in Guests of the Nation limits us to the mind of just one person, but makes the story feel more real and

Get Access