preview

Welfare Argument Analysis

Decent Essays

The welfare system has a been a debatable topic for many years now. People have various viewpoints that relate to the welfare system. Most people believe that the welfare system is abused. On the other hand, people do not mind paying more money for the less fortunate to be provided with food, shelter, etc. This is a hard topic to consider because there are countless variables that play a major role in how much money one could receive from welfare or other forms of government assistance. Mountain Heights Academy presents an argumentative speech. In this argument, the unknown author addresses that the welfare system must be reformed because the current system has only increased poverty levels. It additionally addresses that there is a wide range …show more content…

This argument has convincing premises; however, it lacks legitimate evidentiary support leading it to be an invalid argument. The primary issue is the author's premises, the basics for the argument, lack legitimate evidentiary support. Additionally, the author provides only a few premises to support their argument. The premises that are stated in the essay are weak. For example, the author states that there is a wide array of significant ills in the welfare program (Mountain Heights Academy). However, there is no evidence to support the premise. To develop support for this premise, the author could provide evidentiary support, such a providing examples or facts to prove there are significant ills in the welfare system. They could also simple state what the ills in the welfare system are to develop support. Developing the support would additionally build the author’s credibility. The author follows their premise by expressing how they know ten families who live on welfare. Referring to average people in an argument that do not have credentials does not qualify as support to an argument. Information that is credible such as statistics or facts is often …show more content…

Assumptions weaken an argument because it is often difficult to argue unless the audience shares the same assumptions. The assumptions need to clearly be explained and not left for interpretation. The author claims that several of the families keep having more babies to increase their handouts from the government (Mountain Heights Academy). However, the author seems to have no background such as being a social worker which deals with assisting lower class people with government funding such as welfare. They additionally have no proof that people have children only to receive money from the government. Also, the opposing side is never addressed. There are some individuals and families that truly need the welfare system to assist them sometimes. They do not necessarily live off it or have children only to collect money from the government. This assumption can be interpreted many ways because there is no proof. This assumption weakens the argument tremendously. For instance, the author mentioned that the welfare program as we know does absolutely nothing that it was set up to do (Mountain Heights Academy). The author remarks that welfare system does nothing, but does not provide any facts or other information to support the assumption. Information or research could have been provided to justify why the current welfare system does nothing. This assumption is left for interpretation by the

Get Access