What Are The Similarities Between Ancient Greece And Rome

To begin with, both of their ways that they chose the officials were similar but also differed. The Athenian Government and the Roman Republic both had the citizens of each side choose the officials, but they both had a difference in limitations on how they chose the officials. In Athens, the citizens would vote for the officials, but the people who were official citizens were the ones who were 18 or over, born in Athens, and had to be males. This means that outsiders, slaves, or women could not vote because they were not considered citizens. Additionally, the Athenian Government system for voting was organized with citizens by the name of demes or demos; who belonged to tribes and where combined with others of the same area to make a larger group, which in turn were combined to form ten tribes. (Gill, thoughtco 2017). In contrast, citizens of Rome had to be over 15 years old, male slaves could also vote if they were granted freedom, the women were considered citizens but had no voting rights. The

First, The Roman Republic had three main units and other small branches, much like America’s government. For the first main unit, there is a dictator that was elected by the people and took total control of Rome during a crisis, such as food shortages, wars, and other things. The second main unit is the Senate that collected taxes and passed all of the laws. For the last unit there are the Consuls that had control over the military when not in a crisis. They were elected by majority like America’s government. They also chose the senate members. And that is how Ancient Rome’s government worked.

Thesis: The Greek influence of outstanding culture, gods, and their beautiful art to the Romans’ they took this inspiration on to their own creation. Both ancient build devotion to their gods they would bring the most precious things to them temples, however, they would focus on making large empire to rule and to take control of their city-states.

By around 500 BC, the new idea of citizenship began to take shape. The people of an empire were no longer referred to as subjects, but as citizens. These people were given certain rights, but along with these rights came responsibilities as well. Although both the Romans and Athenians had citizens, they had different outlooks on what an individual’s right and responsibilities were. Athens’ system for citizenship was better than that of Rome’s because all citizens were given equal right, their government was built by the poor, they protected their democracy.

Similarities between both ancient Greece and Rome’s government was they both had different branches of government, they both had a senate and multiple government powers, Rome had the emperor, senate, assemblies, and councils. While Greece had senate and representatives. Both cultures had a class system that played into how much power a person had in government. In Rome you were either a slave, freedman, peasant or citizen. Within being a citizen they had ranks. Citizens were the highest of the classes and were able to run for senate and able to participate in government. The republic was controlled by the emperor. Magistrates and provincial governors were chosen from wealthy aristocrats. This is similar to the Greeks because their social class also had effect on their political power. In Greece you had to be a male who owned land, these people were called citizens, if you were not a citizen they you could not vote, the people who could not vote were the freedmen and slaves called the lower class.

Ancient Greece peoples were, for the most part, farmers, their diet it was mostly grains, or to use the Greek word, sistos. The fertile soil from the hillsides of the mountainous lands, surrounded by water, provided the perfect habitat for olive, fig, and grape trees to grow naturally. In the Island of Siphnos and the Mountains of Thrace, gold and silver were found. Additionally, silver could be found in Laurionin Attica. The mainland and Aegean Islands was the home to the abundance of iron ore. Lavish Greek forest located in the Highlands were regrettably depleted of wood resources quite rapidly. Devastated first by home and wagon production followed by goat and charcoal production. Wood, the most significant resource, soon had to be imported to keep up with the demand for the of building of ships (Roman).

In Rome and China, the rise of two religions started towards the end of each empire. In Rome, there was an introduction to Christianity, in China, there was an introduction to Buddhism. As for philosophies, China was much more influenced by them than Rome. For example, Han China relied greatly on Confucianism and Legalism for pointers on how to run the government. Both philosophies were extremely different. Confucianism was used much more at first. This philosophy was based off of the belief that “people are basically good.” Confucianism convinced the administration to take it easy on punishment. For example, Confucianism taught that if a person messes up or goes against the law, they shall be educated, not only punished. Negating Confucianism were the ways of Legalism, which was used later and specified that “human nature is selfish.” Legalism persuaded the government to discipline civilians for their actions on much harsher terms. All of these religions and philosophies altered the way the government was

Ancient Rome and United States are similar in so many different ways, and probably is similar in many more ways that hasn’t been discovered yet. Like for one they are both global powers in their prime and was at the top of the mountain were others knew not to mess with them, to basically do what you are told. They both had a very huge population, both have added and added throughout their years of their prime. Both started out as rookies and newbies and evolved into main eventers. Both had the coliseum, which Rome takes credit for the first ever one built. Both grew and grew their land to have land that was not originally theirs. Rome started off small and just at sometimes were over populated than what they had, so they needed more. US Bought

The Representative voting system in the Athenian government was more democratic, than the Roman Republic. In Athens, the first 6000 male citizens voted for their elected officials. Athen’s voting system is truly democratic because the male citizens voted on roles in the government, and sign up for roles. In Rome, all full male citizens could vote, while leaving out the other two types of citizenship that cannot vote2. Only having full citizens is less democratic because the other two citizens could not vote. The Athenian Democracy and Roman Republic both have restrictions on their voting system, but Rome had more restrictions on citizenship.

When thinking of great empires that once existed it's natural that Ancient Rome and Greece come to mind. They were both very accomplished with an abundance of theories and devices that impacted the world. The empires were greatly influenced by each other. The Romans adopted many ideas from The Greeks, but they also had different variations of each, such as their government, art, and religion.

Concomitant with the Athenian system, in the city of Rome popular government was introduced as well, albeit under a different name, respublica (from "res" – thing and "publicus" – public). Consequently the republic was similar with Greek demokratia. At the beginning only aristocrats or patricians were allowed to participate at the governing act, but "after much struggle the common people [….] also gained entry" (Dahl, 1998: 13). Only male patricians, later lower castes as well, were able to govern, meaning that women, same as in Athens, were denied any political rights. Starting as a city-state, the Roman Republic conquered territories far beyond its initial borders and gave Roman citizenship to the conquered people. Even though this system might seem sturdy, the impossibility to adjust the institutions of popular government to the increasing number of citizens and the ever-growing Republic is a major flaw. In order to exert their political rights, the conquered people turned into Roman citizens had to participate in meetings in the city of Rome, a tedious and expensive effort, which corroborated with the increase in

Greek was the birthplace of democracy as in Romans was a republic government. In each nation, both male children in their teens became citizens. Each country had slaves, freedmen, and citizens, although the Greeks had Metics and the Romans had Plebeians. The Greeks believed in meeting in a group and making decisions, whereas the Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians those held by two

Democracy was instated in ancient Greece by the tyrant Cleisthenes. Cleisthenes was strongly against factionalism and took steps to prevent factions from occurring in the democracy. There were three natural factions in Greece; urban, rural, and coastal. To offset this, Cleisthenes divided Greece into 170 demes and 10 tribes. The tribes consisted of scattered demes so they would be prevented from allying together to create a faction. The goal of this new form of government was to maximize individual liberties. Greece’s democracy was significant because no other ancient society put so much power on the hands of the people and because officials served the state and the constitution, not a person (125).

The ancient Greeks and Roman civilizations both began their histories with the emergence of city states. Both of these civilizations made contributions to the Middle East. The Greeks had made a wild spread of discoveries on several fields. This included astronomy by Ptolemy, geometry by Euclid, and the philosophy of the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius of his Stoic philosophy. Because the Greeks were widely known as a creative and prestigious race, the Romans were influenced by the Iliad (Homer’s legendary poem) that their religious beliefs were similar. Roman, on the other hand, influenced how other empires would be shaped in Middle East for centuries. Indeed, the Roman Empire formed a centralized state with a set of law, and a powerful

Concomitant with the Athenian system, in the city of Rome popular government was introduced as well, albeit under a different name, respublica (from "res" – thing and "publicus" – public). Consequently the republic was similar with Greek demokratia. At the beginning only aristocrats or patricians were allowed to participate at the governing act, but "after much struggle the common people [….] also gained entry" (Dahl, 1998: 13). Only male patricians, later lower castes as well, were able to govern, meaning that women, same as in Athens, were denied any political rights. Starting as a city-state, the Roman Republic conquered territories far beyond its initial borders and gave Roman citizenship to the conquered people. Even though this system might seem sturdy, the impossibility to adjust the institutions of popular government to the increasing number of citizens and the ever-growing