preview

Where Are You Going Where Have You Been

Decent Essays

Parents and their children will never be what the other wants because humans are far from being perfect. The conflict between parents and children are inevitable, but words and actions usually display the love children have for them. Joyce Carol Oates’ “Where are you Going, where have you been” and Seamus Heaney’s “Digging” are two examples that display the complicated relationship children have with their parents. These stories also represent the fluctuating feelings children have regarding their parents. The similarities and differences in the short story and poem have the same message; however, they have differences.

The theme in “Where are you Going, where have you been” and “Digging” both has the same message. Even though children may …show more content…

Connie was a rebellious teenager wanting to escape her parents; whereas, Heaney was rebelling because he did not want to live the life of his father and grandfather. Oates, talking about Connie leaving home to go out with friends, says, “Sometimes they went across the highway … where older kids hung out” (507), showing Connie’s rebellious behavior. Connie’s parents would not let her go to a restaurant where the older kids congregated, which is why she is a rebel. Connie was a rebel, like many of the teenagers during her lifetime. The time of social change was in the atmosphere and generations were at a crossroads between traditional values and new values. Connie was a hedonistic rebel because she did things that felt good, like going out with older boys. Heaney was also a rebel because he wanted to become a writer, which was against his father’s intentions. Heaney, displaying his rebelliousness, says, “But I’ve no spade to follow men like them” (line 28, 887), presenting his dispassion for potato farming. Heaney respected and recognized his father's displeasure with his life decision; however, Heaney knew he wanted to work with the pen and not the shovel, breaking away from his family tradition. There are an ample number of fathers that want their children to follow their footsteps, and when children do not follow their father’s footsteps they become displeased with the …show more content…

The main difference between Connie and Heaney is that Connie did not have respect for her family until Arnold Friend confronted them with the threat of death; whereas, Heaney showed consistent respect and love throughout the poem. Connie shows consistent resentment towards her parents because she felt that they did not love her. Oates, talking about Connie’s mother describing her, says, “Connie couldn’t do a thing” (506), talking about how Connie is incomparable to her sister June. When children feel like they are a disappointment they have no desire to please their parents, which is what Connie did. She would go out and meet with friends in places a young teenager should not be. Connie’s father was neglectful towards Connie because he would not spend time with her. Oates, describing the actions of her father, says, “Their father was away at work most of the time and when he came home he wanted supper and he read the newspaper at supper and … went to bed” (506). The laxity of her parents caused her to rebel and it drove her to make bad decisions. Heaney has the polar opposite view of Connie. Unlike Connie, Heaney revealed his sincere respect for his father by saying, “The old man could handle a spade” (Line 15, 887). The fundamental difference between Heaney’s poem and Oates’ short story is that respect for the parents differ from one another. Connie

Get Access