Why Should We Bother Analysis

Many are rich many are poor many have money many don’t. Have you ever had a moment where you did something selfish for desperation of money and karma hit you right back with a right hook?. And felt regret towards yourself. In the short story “Why, You Reckon” the author uses irony and dialogue, to show the audience that money can't buy happiness.

One way that a simple person could start to help is by buying food locally. This would cause less pollution from factories and greenhouse gases from products drove or flown in. Furthermore, pay the bills online to help conserve trees. This could save 18.5 million trees every year. Along with this it could remove 2.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide/ other gases while getting rid of 1.7 billion pounds of solid waste. Lastly, a person could go about adjusting the thermostat a degree lower than what the temperature is outside in the winter and adjusting it a degree higher in the summer to save 10 percent on energy

The article “Why Bother” written by Michael Pollan explains how bad climate change has become; he uses cheap energy and specialization to slow the phenomenon. He proclaims that people are all waiting around on each other to make the first move but no one is moving. He understands how critical the world has become and suggests people now have to start going green. He says that to modify the way climate change has taken charge, the best ways to slow it down is laws and a massive amount of money. Pollan suggests having a personal garden or even a community garden will help reduce the carbon footprint.

The world’s climate is changing, and the effects of it will not only affect the inhabitants and the planet, but also humans. Everyone usually only pays attention to the weather on a weekly or even a monthly basis. However, humans don’t pay attention to the changes that they are causing. Very few people actually accept that they are the ones who are causing it and that they are also the ones that can help with the issue. It is time to take action on this problem that will only continue to cause horrible consequences and the only way to do that is having humans change their ways. Even starting with the smallest way can have a dramatic change if everyone is doing it.

“Why Bother?” is directed towards everyday citizens who want to make an impact against climate change.

Although Clive says that employees at Lifeline can never be sure if their call saves someone, Peter Ho Davies, author of “I Don’t Know, What Do You Think?” implies that Clive has the opportunity to save Mary from killing herself. However, he does not utilize this opportunity, and Mary commits suicide. The author indicates that Clive could have saved Mary's life if he disregarded his detached approach to issues established within him by the death of his child, his wife's discouragement, and the Lifeline procedures. Clive never confronts his feelings about Carol’s death, which suggests that he is incapable of managing grief. When Helen finds Clive crying over Mary’s death, he tells her that he is crying for Carol, and Helen says, “at last,” (Davies

Politicians favor economic gain rather than environmental sustainability Global warming is portrayed by politicians as a hoax, because money is more important than the environment. The purpose of this article is to persuade people to take action against global warming. It is a scientific fact that climate change is real, but not enough action is being taken to stop it.

We can reduce air pollution by Conserving energy, Use energy efficient light bulbs, Participate in your local utility’s energy conservation programs, Limit driving by carpooling, using public transportation, biking and walking, Combine Shopping trips for fewer trips, Use electric or hand-powered lawn care equipment and mobiles, Be careful not to spill gasoline when filling up your car, Run dishwashers and washing machines only when full, Choose environmentally friendly cleaners and bleaches, Advocate for emission reductions from power plants and more stringent national vehicle emission standards, Decrease construction, Decrease fuel burning, Space heaters: Use them only when someone is awake

One studies literature to gain an understanding of an idea. These ideas can be of morals, political issues, societal problems or simply a struggle. A person can come to realization or find new views by analyzing an author and why they are writing. A person doesn’t act unless needed to accomplish a task. They write to something worth reading, if not for others then at least for themselves.

Some people, perhaps, choose not to take action because it would be too “difficult” or too “expensive” but that is simply not true. “You can take a stand at home by simply adjusting your thermostat, recycling, and monitoring your electrical use” (Take). Taking action does not mean you must buy a new vehicle or a new home – you can make a change in many small ways. It does not take a lot of time or money to protect our planet and those that live here. If everyone chooses to just do something small, it will make a big

1. Can you think of a common stereotype of sociologists? What is it? After reading this box, do you still think it is valid?

Stop using fossil fuel use by 2050, stop oil pipelines, tankers, exporting coal, and oil sands production. To instead invest in clean technology or refining the oil instead

To be honest, I procrastinated with writing this essay. Why, you ask? Because I really dislike writing essays. “But why again”, you ask? Well, because it takes up a lot of precious time. Time that I could be spending playing with my kids, watching TV, or enjoying myself. Not locking myself in a room hours at a time to avoid distraction and hoping that I come up with an essay that gets a passing grade.

Individuals need to adopt better standards for themselves and for others when it comes to consumption. When you boil it down, money has all the power behind all of the societal-economic and environmental issues today. Consider the consumer for example. The more money the average consumer has, the greater their appetite for consumption is, whether it be iPhones, food, cars, houses, et cetera. With more consumption comes even more waste through wasted food, CO2 emissions, and many other things that are a detriment to the environment. The people who are better off don’t settle for what they need, they try to get everything that is possibly obtainable. This is just one side of the coin however. With a severe lack of wealth and extreme poverty, whole societies filled with people who can’t fulfill basic needs follow. This skewed wealth distribution creates even more problems within itself, such as arguing between parties about how to fix it, and even denial of the issues themselves. Hopefully more people will come to realize that these issues are a serious threat to our planet, the international economy, and Humanity in general, and maybe someone will be brave enough to step up and do something about

For example, you can consider different human communities/countries and their beliefs and value systems which may influence what they know about climate change and what they are doing about it. Or you may take an approach starting with those countries/communities which are doing most/least about global warming and analysing why in terms of their level of knowledge or the main values in society.