A study was done to look at the relationship between number of movies people watch at the theater each year and the number of books that they read each year. The results of the survey are shown below. Movies Books 3 9 6 5 1 10 12 3 10 9 1 4 4 11 6 8 7 6 8 6 5 3 Round to 2 decimal places. a. Find the correlation coefficient: r = b. The null and alternative hypotheses for correlation are: Ho: ? ✓ = 0 H₁: ? 0 The p-value is: Round to 4 decimal places. c. Use a level of significance of a = 0.05 to state the conclusion of the hypothesis test in the context of the study. O There is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that there is a correlation between the number of movies watched per year and the number of books read per year. Thus, the use of the regression line is not appropriate. O There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that a person who watches more movies will read fewer books than a person who watches fewer movies. O There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that there is a correlation between the number of movies watched per year and the number of books read per year. Thus, the regression line is useful. O There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that a person who watches fewer movies will read fewer books than a person who watches fewer movies.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions
Section4.5: Correlation And Causation
Problem 2BGP
icon
Related questions
Question
A study was done to look at the relationship between number of movies people watch at the theater each
year and the number of books that they read each year. The results of the survey are shown below.
Movies 3 9
Books 6 5
1 10 10 9
1 4
12
3
4 6
8
11
8 7 6
6
5 3
Round to 2 decimal places.
a. Find the correlation coefficient: r =
b. The null and alternative hypotheses for correlation are:
Ho: ? ✓ = 0
H₁: ? ✓
#0
The p-value is:
Round to 4 decimal places.
c. Use a level of significance of a = 0.05 to state the conclusion of the hypothesis test in the context
of the study.
O There is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that there is a correlation between the
number of movies watched per year and the number of books read per year. Thus, the use of
the regression line is not appropriate.
There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that a person who watches more movies
will read fewer books than a person who watches fewer movies.
O There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that there is a correlation between the
number of movies watched per year and the number of books read per year. Thus, the
regression line is useful.
There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that a person who watches fewer movies
will read fewer books than a person who watches fewer movies.
(Round to two decimal places)
d. ² =
e. Interpret ²:
O Given any fixed number of movies watched per year, 65% of the population reads the predicted
number of books per year.
O There is a large variation in the number books people read each year, but if you only look at
people who watch a fixed number of movies each year, this variation on average is reduced by
65%.
There is a 65% chance that the regression line will be a good predictor for the number of books
people read based on the number of movies they watch each year.
O 65% of all people watch about the same number of movies as they read books each year.
Transcribed Image Text:A study was done to look at the relationship between number of movies people watch at the theater each year and the number of books that they read each year. The results of the survey are shown below. Movies 3 9 Books 6 5 1 10 10 9 1 4 12 3 4 6 8 11 8 7 6 6 5 3 Round to 2 decimal places. a. Find the correlation coefficient: r = b. The null and alternative hypotheses for correlation are: Ho: ? ✓ = 0 H₁: ? ✓ #0 The p-value is: Round to 4 decimal places. c. Use a level of significance of a = 0.05 to state the conclusion of the hypothesis test in the context of the study. O There is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that there is a correlation between the number of movies watched per year and the number of books read per year. Thus, the use of the regression line is not appropriate. There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that a person who watches more movies will read fewer books than a person who watches fewer movies. O There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that there is a correlation between the number of movies watched per year and the number of books read per year. Thus, the regression line is useful. There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that a person who watches fewer movies will read fewer books than a person who watches fewer movies. (Round to two decimal places) d. ² = e. Interpret ²: O Given any fixed number of movies watched per year, 65% of the population reads the predicted number of books per year. O There is a large variation in the number books people read each year, but if you only look at people who watch a fixed number of movies each year, this variation on average is reduced by 65%. There is a 65% chance that the regression line will be a good predictor for the number of books people read based on the number of movies they watch each year. O 65% of all people watch about the same number of movies as they read books each year.
f. The equation of the linear regression line is:
ý =
x (Please show your answers to two decimal places)
g. Use the model to predict the number of books read per year for someone who watches 7 movies per
year.
Books per year =
(Please round your answer to the nearest whole number.)
h. Interpret the slope of the regression line in the context of the question:
O The slope has no practical meaning since people cannot read a negative number of books.
As x goes up, y goes down.
For every additional movie that people watch each year, there tends to be an average
decrease of 0.91 books read.
i. Interpret the y-intercept in the context of the question:
O If someone watches 0 movies per year, then that person will read 12 books this year.
O The average number of books read per year is predicted to be 12 books.
O The y-intercept has no practical meaning for this study.
O The best prediction for a person who doesn't watch any movies is that they will read 12 books
each year.
Transcribed Image Text:f. The equation of the linear regression line is: ý = x (Please show your answers to two decimal places) g. Use the model to predict the number of books read per year for someone who watches 7 movies per year. Books per year = (Please round your answer to the nearest whole number.) h. Interpret the slope of the regression line in the context of the question: O The slope has no practical meaning since people cannot read a negative number of books. As x goes up, y goes down. For every additional movie that people watch each year, there tends to be an average decrease of 0.91 books read. i. Interpret the y-intercept in the context of the question: O If someone watches 0 movies per year, then that person will read 12 books this year. O The average number of books read per year is predicted to be 12 books. O The y-intercept has no practical meaning for this study. O The best prediction for a person who doesn't watch any movies is that they will read 12 books each year.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL