Consider a company faced with a competitor's price reduction. Should the company also reduce price in order to maintain market share or should the company maintain its current price? The company has conducted some preliminary research showing the financial outcomes of each decision under two competitor responses: the competition maintains its price or the competition lowers its price further. The company feels pretty confident that the competitor cannot lower its price further and assigns that outcome a probability (p) of 0.8, which means the other outcome would have only a 20 percent chance of occurring (1-p=0.2). These outcomes are shown in the table below:Competitive ResponseCompany action Maintain Price, p=0.8 Reduce Price, (1-p)=0.2Reduce Price $165,000 $125,000Maintain Price $175,000 $105,000The expected monetary value (EMV) of reducing the price is
Consider a company faced with a competitor's price reduction. Should the company also reduce price in order to maintain market share or should the company maintain its current price? The company has conducted some preliminary research showing the financial outcomes of each decision under two competitor responses: the competition maintains its price or the competition lowers its price further. The company feels pretty confident that the competitor cannot lower its price further and assigns that outcome a probability (p) of 0.8, which means the other outcome would have only a 20 percent chance of occurring (1-p=0.2). These outcomes are shown in the table below:
Competitive Response
Company action Maintain Price, p=0.8 Reduce Price, (1-p)=0.2
Reduce Price $165,000 $125,000
Maintain Price $175,000 $105,000
The expected monetary value (EMV) of reducing the price is
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images